Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Supreme Court Decision - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
As per the wisdom and informed opinion of this Court of Law, the City of Intrusia no way violated the search and seizure protections enshrined in the Fourth Amendment by intercepting the text messages of the accused Joe Doe, and these text messages are aptly admissible in this…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.6% of users find it useful
Supreme Court Decision
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Supreme Court Decision"

of the Political Science of the Teacher 14 July Doe v. of Intrusia- Supreme Court Decision As per the wisdom and informed opinion of this Court of Law, the City of Intrusia no way violated the search and seizure protections enshrined in the Fourth Amendment by intercepting the text messages of the accused Joe Doe, and these text messages are aptly admissible in this Court as valid and credible evidence. This Court has ample reasons to set aside the appeal made by the accused, Joe Doe.
The Fourth Amendment in its word and spirit intends to protect “The right of the people to be secure”, in the condition that they are subjected to “unreasonable searches”. The evidence culled through these text messages intercepted by the police, when considered, does establish beyond any doubt that the accused was indeed engaging in unreasonable activities, which jeopardized the lives of the innocent citizens. Thereby the initiation of the interception of the text messages of the accused by the police, considering the fact that the police was under an immense pressure to act in time, to avoid any further loss of life of the innocent citizens, was no way unreasonable. This act of the police when seen in the larger context seems totally reasonable. It does need to be mentioned that the “trespass doctrine” facilitated by Olmstead v. United States (1928) if applied to the situation under consideration, validate the interception of Doe’s text messages by the police without invoking any violation of the Fourth Amendment Rights, as the police while doing so no way violated the essential dignity of the accused as a human and as a citizen.
Besides, the two pronged test propounded in Katz v. United States (1967), when applied to the issue under consideration does nullify the appeal made by the accused. While exchanging the text messages associated with his illegal activities, the accused was no way exhibiting an expectation of privacy as he was well aware that he was exchanging these text messages with the intention to facilitate his unlawful activities, and thereby, through the exercise of commonsense, was well aware that such messages and communications would attract the well deserved attention of the law and order machinery. Doe was well aware that he was relying for the exchange of these text messages on the services sold by the local cell phone carrier, and in the light of United States v. Miller (1975), Doe’s rights were not infringed upon if the company as a third party, entrusted his text messages to the police, guided by the belief that it was its legal and constitutional duty to help the police. Besides, if the Court gives credence to the larger social conscience, Doe as a citizen could have easily deduced that the society would no way consider his expectations of privacy pertaining to the communications associated with his illegal activities to be ‘reasonable’, as required by Katz, more so when the police was acting under the urgency of saving any further loss of life.
Hence, the appeal placed by Doe is set aside by the Court. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Supreme Court Decision Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Supreme Court Decision Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Supreme Court Decision Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Supreme Court Decision

Cause and effect on the Dred Scott Supreme Court Decision

... the Death of Emerson, Scott claimed ill treatment by Emerson’s wife (Eliza) who denied his right to purchaser his freedom. Scot brought forward a case stating that he was free by virtue of his living in Free States and by his willingness to purchase his freedom. From the perspective of economic causes and effects of the Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scot case there are a number of factors at play. One major consideration was the effect that the decision would have on the overall number of slaves in the USA. At the time of the decision there were a multitude of slaves working in the USA which contributed greatly to the economic output of the nation. According to Economic History Association (, 2010) it is the case...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)

...? Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United s (SCOTUS), in the cases of Coleman v. Brown (1990) and Plata v. Brown (2001) on the people of the State of California The cases of Coleman v. Brown (1990) and Plata v. Brown (2001) involved serious violations of the constitution in the prison systems of California, which had persisted for years, but remained uncorrected (Anonymous 7). California was then directed to remedy the unusual and cruel punishments clause by a court order from a court of three-judge district. The first class action involved prisoners who had serious mental disorder (Coleman v. Brown), while the second class action involved prisoners who had serious medical conditions (Plata v. Brown). Release...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

U.S. Supreme Court decision

In April, advocates for parental choice in education scored a major victory in the precedent-setting case before the United States Supreme Court, American Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn. The court ruled by a narrow 5-4 margin that the Arizona program promoting school choice can continue − dismissing a lawsuit waged by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of taxpayers who disliked the program. The ruling favored arguments made by the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal organization that defended ACSTO over the years. The concurring justices found that taxpayers have no standing to challenge the program because the contributions going toward tax credits are private funds − not government funds (Liptak,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. versus Hulteen

... a split between the decision of the Ninth Circuit on the one hand and on the other hand the Sixth and Seventh Circuits on the same issue (AT & T Corp v. Hulteen 3-4). Hulteen had to take the issue to the Court without negotiating a settlement due to the fact that she had to satisfy herself with considerably low pension than she would have received, if she would not have taken the pregnancy leave. The policy of AT & T Corp. will never have allowed her to enjoy the full pension benefits and she had to file a suit. The EEOC had to resort to a case, as it had to keep in mind the interest of the other workers. Finally, AT & T had to move to the Supreme Court, as it was not satisfied with the decision of the Ninth circuit. 3. The Procedure...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

The recent Supreme Court decision allowing large corporations to run their own political ads

... The Supreme Court Decision Allowing Large Corporations to Run Their Own Political Ads Since 2002, United s federal elections campaigns have been regulated by the federal laws under Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), popularly known as the McCain-Feingold. Under the law, corporations and unions were not allowed to use their treasuries to advocate for a particular candidate or run their own campaign ads (Francia 16). They were only allowed to express their interests through political actions committees that were strongly regulated. However, just before the crucial 2010 midterm congressional election period, this law was partly upended by the United States Supreme Court. In the case of Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Was the US Supreme Court Health Care Decision Written by Chief Justice Roberts an Example of Judicial Activism

... justice and fairness for the people. Judicial activism was not apparent in the recent Supreme Court decision even if the decision imposed certain changes in the law being passed. These are incidental results in the exercise of its functions, with the end goal of ensuring the compliance of the laws with the constitution. Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 3 Body…………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Overview of Supreme Court functions……………………………………….. 4 National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius……………………. 5 Judicial review………………………………………………………………… 5 Judicial activism………………………………………………………………. 6 Judicial activism v. Judicial review…………………………………………… 7 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….. 8 References...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Case note on the decision of the Supreme Court in Autoclenz v Belcher [2011]

...? A case on the decision of the Supreme Court in Autoclenz v Belcher UKSC 41. T Introduction The Supreme Court in its latest decision concerning Autoclenz ltd v. Belcher and Others focused on applying the right approach in solving employment disputes of written contracts1. It sought to establish the actual employment context between the concerned parties as well as the legitimacy of the written term. In this case, the main question to attend to was as to whether the claimants were actually workers, by taking into consideration the already existing regulations such as the 1998 working time regulation (WTR) and the 1999 national minimum wage regulation (NMWR). The decision offered by this court confirms that a lot of consideration should...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

States Face the Choice of Supreme Court Decision

...States Face the Choice of Supreme Court Decision The state of Vermont supports the expansion of the Medicaid program as proposed by the ACA. The expansion program became effective on January 1, 2014 and allows individuals to access affordable insurance coverage, as long as they qualify by earning an income of up to 138% of the FPL. This policy brief supports the expansion by identifying its benefits and positive expectations. The expansion benefits from the 100% support from the federal government in the early years of the program, and 90% thereafter. Expanding the program, therefore, yields multiple benefits for Vermont State, and the state should continue educating and encouraging its residents to take advantage of the Medicaid program...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Supreme Court Winery Decision

...Supreme Court Winery Decision Question 1 According to the utilitarian ethics, a situation is morally upright if the course of action serves to the benefit of the majority. Both the Supreme Court ruling and the earlier law generate benefits to different members of the American society. However, based on the utilitarian ethics, the decision by the Supreme Court is not moral since it eradicates the utility. The utility lost in this scenario is defined by reduced tax revenue and a decline in the quality of life of the society. In this perspective, the ruling results in loss of tax used to support the major functions of the government, which is enjoyed by its citizens. It is plausible to note that the ruling destroyed the distribution chain...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Miranda v Arizona: The erosion of the decision by the US Supreme Court throught the years

... point to proceedings of the Supreme Court back in 1966. Miranda vs. Arizona Case Miranda vs. Arizona revolved around the issue of defendants’ rights during the period in police custody, and specifically during interrogation. Back in 1963, a young man named Miranda Ernesto was arrested by Arizona police for alleged kidnapping and rape of a certain female teenager. While in police custody, interrogation officers made Miranda to give both oral and written confession of his alleged crimes. In the court room, the written confession was used as evidence, thus giving the jury grounds for sentencing Miranda to 30 years imprisonment. As a response to the sentence, Arizona state attorney appealed against the court’s decision on grounds that Miranda...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Supreme Court Decision for FREE!

Contact Us