Nobody downloaded yet

The recent Supreme Court decision allowing large corporations to run their own political ads - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Name Tutor Course Date The Supreme Court Decision Allowing Large Corporations to Run Their Own Political Ads Since 2002, United States federal elections campaigns have been regulated by the federal laws under Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), popularly known as the McCain-Feingold…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.7% of users find it useful
The recent Supreme Court decision allowing large corporations to run their own political ads
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"The recent Supreme Court decision allowing large corporations to run their own political ads"

Download file to see previous pages However, just before the crucial 2010 midterm congressional election period, this law was partly upended by the United States Supreme Court. In the case of Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court, by a 5-4 votes, ruled that corporations and unions were constitutionally allowed to spend as much money as they can on campaign ads supporting particular candidates (Francia 16). However, the corporations were still prohibited from donating money directly to campaigns. Ever since its ruling, the court’s decision to allow large corporations run their own ads has received mixed reactions among politicians, scholars, lawyers and the rest of the citizens. Whereas some people have been in favor of the ruling, others have strongly contested the decision, terming it a threat to democracy (Carney 2). Those against the ruling argue that the decision favors republicans, threatens democracy and allows for election interference by the corporations, as they can now run their own ads in support of a specific candidate (Kosterlitz 5). However, this is just fear of unknown. For as much as the ruling might have negative implications on the federal elections, these arguments are not true and, as far as I am concerned, the decision will not have drastic effects on the politics of the United States of America, especially the elections. Therefore, to arrive at the conclusion that the ruling will not threaten the democracy of this nation but actually help it, this paper will make several observations. First, the argument that the court’s ruling greatly favors republicans is not true because, as opposed to the previous years, nowadays most large corporations hedge their bets and give donations to both parties. In fact, they give donations to whoever is in power, or possibly going to be (Carney 2). This explains why the Obama campaigns were able to do so well. All the funds used in the campaign did not only come from individuals, a huge portion came from large corporation, that is, their PACs. Therefore, the ruling will not favor republicans, but it will favor the most promising or prominent party. Secondly, the claim that large corporations will greatly dominate or interfere with the politics of the country is perplexing (Carney 2). For quite a long time even before the ruling, large corporations, such as New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today and The Wall Street Journal, among others, have had the ability to further their political needs. Under the political action committees (PACs), they have been given the permission to support and donate to political parties or candidates. Moreover, most unions or corporate lobbyist PACs have been running ads about various issues or in support of various candidates. Therefore, it a fact that this ruling will not change the politics or the election of the country, but it will just eliminate the middleman, PACs (Carney 2). Finally, the ruling is good for small businesses because it could promote free market competition. Previously, before the court’s ruling, small businesses could not compete effectively with the large corporations because they had no PACs and lacked money to give to powerful lobbyists, who had PACs, to act on their behalf. Large corporations, such as Wal-Mart, had great influence on political issues of the country and, thus, received favors from the political divine, leaving the small firms to deteriorate further and go out of business. However, with the ruling, the small firms ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The recent Supreme Court decision allowing large corporations to run Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1439704-the-recent-supreme-court-decision-allowing-large
(The Recent Supreme Court Decision Allowing Large Corporations to Run Essay)
https://studentshare.org/english/1439704-the-recent-supreme-court-decision-allowing-large.
“The Recent Supreme Court Decision Allowing Large Corporations to Run Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1439704-the-recent-supreme-court-decision-allowing-large.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Cause and effect on the Dred Scott Supreme Court Decision
After this point a brief discussion on the economic causes and effects of the case will be covered with a discussion on social causes and effects. As a final point this paper will provide a discussion on some political causes and effects of the decision and provide a conclusion.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Impact of the recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
The cases of Coleman v. Brown (1990) and Plata v. Brown (2001) involved serious violations of the constitution in the prison systems of California, which had persisted for years, but remained uncorrected (Anonymous 7). California was then directed to remedy the unusual and cruel punishments clause by a court order from a court of three-judge district.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
U.S. Supreme Court decision
The court ruled by a narrow 5-4 margin that the Arizona program promoting school choice can continue − dismissing a lawsuit waged by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of taxpayers who disliked the program.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Supreme Court
The defense argued that this was a suggestive situation, and, therefore, would promote unreliable identification. The prosecution maintained that the spontaneous meeting increased reliability, saying the issue should be decided by the jury. The trial judge suppressed the witness identification, and a mistrial was also granted.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Supreme court ( political science)
The judiciary, legislative and executive branches form the three separate and independent branches of government. The Supreme Court’s responsibility includes resolving disputes by interpreting and applying the law. The legislative branch
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Recent Supreme Court decisions 2014
The petitioners argued that the police officers acted against the fourth amendments. The petitioned pleaded guilty but raised the claim that the police
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Supreme Court Decision
This Court has ample reasons to set aside the appeal made by the accused, Joe Doe. The Fourth Amendment in its word and spirit intends to protect “The right of the people to be secure”, in the condition that they are subjected to
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Political philosophy and the constitution/supreme court
The experience of this era showed how judicial review and judicial independence were based on public opinion. The Liberty clause created a problem to Hamilton’s vision because the public had liberty to give their opinions to
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Supreme Court
At the peak of World War II, President Roosevelt signed a presidential executive order 9066 which demanded that all American-Japanese people be evacuated and taken into internment camps where
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Supreme Court
The American government is divided into various arms which perform different functions. The arms include the judiciary, legislature  and the executive. Every branch  of the government has distinctive functions which they perform independent of the other branches. To achieve this each has their specific roles which they perform as led by their leaders.
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic The recent Supreme Court decision allowing large corporations to run their own political ads for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us