Nobody downloaded yet

US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. versus Hulteen - Research Paper Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
The instant case is a US Supreme Court case in which the primary issue was to determine whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act is violated by an employer, when pensions are calculated on the basis of accrual rule, giving less retirement credit for pregnancy than for medical leave…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. versus Hulteen
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. versus Hulteen"

Download file to see previous pages Hulteen 1). The matter in controversy is clear, if the employer does not give an employee full pension benefit by excluding the time of pregnancy leave on the ground that when the employee took pregnancy leave, the PDA Act was not operative, Can the employee file a suit for discrimination? Can the employee enforce credited leave time for such absence? Can the employee get relief under U.S. law and enforce greater pension benefit? What is the present law with regard to this matter? To find answers to the above questions, a research and in depth analysis of the case in hand would surely prove to be of great help, as discussed in the latter context of the paper. 2. The Dispute Before proceeding further into the case, knowledge of the facts of the case is essential. The petitioner of this case was the American Telegraph & Telephone Company, whereas the respondents consisted of individual respondents in the form of Noreen Hulteen, Eleanora Collet, Elizabeth Snyder, Linda Porter, and the collective-bargaining representative of the employees, the CWA or the Communications Workers of America (AT & T Corp v. Hulteen 3). AT & T provided pensions and other benefits to its employees on the basis of seniority system, relying upon the term of employment, which was equivalent to service at the company minus uncredited leave time. For a period extending from 1960 to mid-1970s the employees on disability leave got full service leave but those who took personal leave, which also included leaves for pregnancy, received a maximum service credit of 30 days. The respondents of this case received less service credit for pregnancy leave than they should have received, if they had taken a leave for disability. Respondent Noreen Hulteen received seven months less credit, Eleanora Collet received six months less credit, while Elizabeth Snyder and Linda Porter received two months less payment. If the total term of employment was not so decreased, they would receive greater pension benefit (AT & T Corp v. Hulteen 2-3). The individual respondents of this case and the CWA filed charges of discrimination against AT & T with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). After receipt of complaint EEOC issued a Letter of determination finding that AT & T had discriminated against Hulteen and similar class. The EEOC issued a notice of right to sue to the respondent and the CWA, after which Hulteen filed a suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court on this issue to resolve a split between the decision of the Ninth Circuit on the one hand and on the other hand the Sixth and Seventh Circuits on the same issue (AT & T Corp v. Hulteen 3-4). Hulteen had to take the issue to the Court without negotiating a settlement due to the fact that she had to satisfy herself with considerably low pension than she would have received, if she would not have taken the pregnancy leave. The policy of AT & T Corp. will never have allowed her to enjoy the full pension benefits and she had to file a suit. The EEOC had to resort to a case, as it had to keep in mind the interest of the other workers. Finally, AT & T had to move to the Supreme Court, as it was not satisfied with the decision of the Ninth circuit. 3. The Procedure The suit never reached the District Court at the first instance. The individual respondents of this case and the CWA filed charges of discrimination with the EEOC, stating that discrimination has taken place on the basis of sex and pregnancy in violation of Title VII. The suit ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. versus Hulteen Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1432825-us-supreme-court-decision-att-v-hulteen
(US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. Versus Hulteen Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/law/1432825-us-supreme-court-decision-att-v-hulteen.
“US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. Versus Hulteen Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1432825-us-supreme-court-decision-att-v-hulteen.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
ki
kirlinjuliet added comment 6 months ago
Student rated this paper as
The topic of "US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. versus Hulteen" is quite often seen among the assignments in university. Still, this sample opens a brand new perspective of seeing the issue. I’ll use the style for my own essay.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. versus Hulteen

Supreme Court Case: Roe versus Wade

... to discussing the Roe v. Wade case. An overview of the Roe versus Wade Case and Supreme Court decision The Roe v. Wade case was decided in 1973 following a suit filed by Norma McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe) against Dallas County District Attorney (Henry Wade). The main event that led to the filing of the case was Roe’s third pregnancy against her wishes. Initially, Roe wanted to procure an abortion pretending that she had been raped. This scheme however failed. During this time, Texas had stringent anti-abortion laws only allowing it in the case of incest and rape. In 1970, the US District Court, Texas, ruled in Roe’s favor citing a number of merits but went short of granting an injunction that would bar the laws on abortion... ?...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

U.S. Supreme Court decision

...to the private schools of their choice. Also, elected, appointed, and/or career policymakers, such as the U.S. Supreme Court Justices who presided over this case ? as well as lawmakers, senators, governors and mayors ? will be making more and more decisions based on the precedent set in this case regarding the use of private funds donated to generate tax credits. Now, bureaucracies will not be allowed to strike down such contributions within the states that adopt the precedent set in Arizona. On the political level, the ACSTO decision has many far-reaching ramifications. Political parties, interest groups, and unions that are generally opposed to...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The US supreme court

...in violation of the Americans with Disabilites Act. This decision revealed that the Supreme Court has not been favourable in regard to civil rights issues. It held that even if the state’s actions are indicative of being hard hearted, they may not necessarily violate provisions of the Constitution (The Leadership Conference, 2012). The US Supreme Court is a democratically legitimate institution because it acts under the given provisions and its judges are elected in keeping with the due process of law. However, the appointment of Supreme Court judges during the President Roosevelt’s time came under cloud...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...The Apocalypse of Adolescence By Yuliya Having read through the article en d "The Apocalypse of Adolescence", several conclusions came to mind. First, juveniles should almost never be given the death penalty, as this provides virtually zero learning in relation to moral guidance and the receipt of understanding as to what is right versus what is wrong. The death penalty takes their young lives and forever changes them, without the opportunity to be rehabilitated by competent sociological or psychological professionals. However, when the case is similar to the one in the article, the juvenile death penalty may be imposed, especially when the children show no regret for their actions. The problem, however, appears to lie in whether...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme court US

...The Supreme Court as a Political At election time, the Supreme Court can be used as a political football. The Supreme Court makes many important decisions with regard to the law. Therefore, it is inherently a political institution. “Instead of a separate entity unaffected by the gale force winds of political change, the Court is a body of nine justices, all with different agendas and varying background” and “it is a very human institution that is and will always be affected by political ideologies and personal feelings” (Politics in the Supreme Court,” 2006, p. 1). The root word of "politics" comes from the Greek, meaning "having two faces." However, some misconceptions must be dispelled. The Supreme court is: political in nature... ...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Supreme Court Winery Decision

...Supreme Court Winery Decision Question 1 According to the utilitarian ethics, a situation is morally upright if the course of action serves to the benefit of the majority. Both the Supreme Court ruling and the earlier law generate benefits to different members of the American society. However, based on the utilitarian ethics, the decision by the Supreme Court is not moral since it eradicates the utility. The utility lost in this scenario is defined by reduced tax revenue and a decline in the quality of life of the society. In this perspective, the ruling results in loss of tax used to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court Decision

...of the Political Science of the Teacher 14 July Doe v. of Intrusia- Supreme Court Decision As per the wisdom and informed opinion of this Court of Law, the City of Intrusia no way violated the search and seizure protections enshrined in the Fourth Amendment by intercepting the text messages of the accused Joe Doe, and these text messages are aptly admissible in this Court as valid and credible evidence. This Court has ample reasons to set aside the appeal made by the accused, Joe Doe. The Fourth Amendment in its word and spirit intends to protect “The right of the people to be secure”, in the condition that they are subjected to...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court of the US

...Supreme Court of the US The Fourth Amendment provides that: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” It is clear from the wording and the tone that subtle of the very Amendment lies in the ‘reasonableness’ of the searches and seizures, put into context, and so has been affirm in Kyllo v. United States (535) among many cases preceding it touching on the same. It is evident from the very outset that...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...Supreme Court case of Korematsu v. U.S Complaint The complaint in this case was that Korematsuwho was an American of Japanese descent was wrongfully evicted from his location to an internment camp. He complained that this violated his constitutional rights and hence refused to move as the order requested. This led to his arrest and conviction based on disloyalty and disobedience to the country and its laws. Brief summary of the facts At the peak of World War II, President Roosevelt signed a presidential executive order 9066 which demanded that all American-Japanese people be evacuated and taken into internment camps where they would be closely monitored. The aim of this order which was named the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Supreme Court

...which include, keeping check and balances on the US executive government. The American constitution empower the supreme court to check and correct the president’s actions. The US Supreme Court is considered to be the most elitist and least democratic institution of the US government This is because it is led by learned judges who are appointed and not elected into their lifetime positions. The supreme court is considered to be the least democratic because the judges are expected to keep checks and balances on the political government, however their actions are not respected thus the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic US Supreme Court Decision AT&T. versus Hulteen for FREE!

Contact Us