According to Mary Shelley, Frankenstein develops a creature from experimentation, which becomes disastrous. The monster causes immense suffering to his loved ones as the creature kills them sequentially. This…
Download file to see previous pages...
The ability to do something, does not guarantee that one should simply do it. Some experiments should not be carried out just because of availability of the necessary skills and equipment. Scientists ought to pause, and think about implications of what they want to conduct. In addition, they should distinguish between the moral and immoral. Conducting an immoral medical practice causes definite harm to society. Therefore, availability of technology to perform an act should not be the only element that dictates scientific activities. In relation to Frankenstein, he had all the necessary materials required to create the monster. He continued to give it life without thinking of the implications the creature would have on society. Consequently, many people from Frankenstein family lost their lives. Others were blamed for the injustice, instead of Frankenstein or the monster, thus causing more pain to the society.
Given that science can be seen as a body of knowledge that can give man God-like abilities, medical practitioners should employ ethics in the different experiments that they conduct. One of the medical ethics relates to ensuring that the doctor works in the best interest of the patient. The practitioner ought to protect the patient from any harm, and promote their comfort. However, Frankenstein did not uphold such care to the creature he created. The creature had life; it walked, communicated, and even demanded for its rights, just like a normal human being (Shelley, 2010). Given these traits, the creature needed a mate for it to lead a comfortable life. On the contrary, Frankenstein did not think about the happiness of the monster and its existence on earth. It did not have any companion, and creation dictates a male and a female for life to be complete. Failure to incorporate such ideas in his experiment devastated him, leading to misery. Consequently, medical practitioners must always weigh their actions, and
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
But Shelly’s attempt to make ghastly-looking creature more humane by giving it some very important humanly feelings often helps a reader to revise their primary decision to see it as a ferocious giant. So, the question that one may ask is: “Who is the real monster then?
Mary Shelly wrote this book out of the various ideas she had about cult. Frankenstein proved that science could be interchanged to meet several requirements. Mary Shelly came up with the storyline because of her illusions with scientists. Analysis Frankenstein depicted several creatures through his laboratory experiments.
Not to mention that everybody older than I was seemed to know a lot about Frankenstein. However, I have not, since very recently, actually read Shelley's novel and the experience opened my eyes not only to who Frankenstein actually was in that novel, but also to the ways of the European world in the 1800s, the beauty of the places depicted in the novel as vividly described by the author, and to Shelley herself for having produced such a very well conceptualized and written piece, moving and entertaining even after 200 years.
presents how a victim can turn into a villain and how that villain, after ending many lives, can remain to be a victim after all the heinous things he has done. Still, “Frankenstein” presents a lot more than these two perspectives to the readers through its varying points of
The author of the essay provides the idea expressed by Frankenstein, namely, "I will pioneer a new way, explore unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation". Besides, it is stated that the reader should be aware that the book contains horrifying elements.
As a result of being abandoned, frightened by the new environment, the monster aimlessly takes a walk through the wilderness. In the process of walking through the wilderness, the monster meets a certain family living there and it introduces itself to them.
nstein, knowledge in regards to the existence of a creator has the crippling effect on the creature as this character is struggling to reconcile on his own perception about himself as compared to the maddening desire for the divine approval and acceptance. It is also impossible