There can be no love without justice - Essay Example

There can be no love without justice affiliation There can be no love without justice This quote means that for love to exist, justice on how you treat people and the environment matters a lot. Individuals should be treated in a just way without being mistreatment and oppressed. As a result, justice as a way of showing you care about the feelings of others.Being just is doing the right thing to your neighbours in a consistent way without prejudice and partiality. A good neighbour is one who thinks about the good of others too and in difficult situations he or she will be there for you.

Moreover, by being just you should love your neighbour the way you love yourself.Love is good will, benevolence, affection, concern and high esteem for the well-being of an individual. Love is not being envious, boastful, rude or arrogant. Additionally, love rejoices in the truth and not in wrongdoings. Finally love believes in all things, endures all things and hopes all things. Love is kind and love never ends.Justice does not exist where there is no love. However, acting in love is not something that is done without any sense of responsibility towards others, it requires proper thought and care.

Therefore, by acting responsibly, justice and love are distributed hence Love and justice are linked (Christoyannopoulos & Milne, 2007).God is just and through this he does everything due to the love he has for mankind. Mankind is treated equally when there is justice. Additionally, mistreatment and oppression are neither available. When justice presence people are shown love and care. Thus, justness symbolizes the presence of love.In absence of justness, people end up being treated in a bad way and also subjected to suffering.

Also, unjustness leads to unequal consideration of peoples demands, therefore love does not prevail where there is no justice.ReferencesChristoyannopoulos, A. J. M. E., & Milne, J. (2007). Love, justice, and social eschatology. Heythrop Journal - Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology, 48, 972–991. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2265.2007.00352.x