Implicit Application Test Methodology at Examining Age Stereotyping in Students - Lab Report Example

Implicit application test (IAT) Methodology al Affiliation The implicit Association test is a process that involves two types of block trails which have four categories which lead to the mapping of the stimulus response. In the methodology, the investigation is related to the design, analysis and the interpretation of the process itself. In the task of finding the ages of the students, the procedural design is also realised by getting the basis of the IAT’s empirical test results. The test consists of five major blocks which are rather the steps required in order to achieve the right results of finding the right critical data. This begins with the dimension learning which is followed by the attribute dimension. The concept of attribute paring follows which is accompanied by the understanding the spatial locations and knowing how to switch them. The last step is the deeper learning of the attribute concept. In order to calculate the effect of the IAT, its latency data is first calculated from the third and fifth step of the testing. Introduction The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a test that deals with two strengths that are relative and it assesses them into four associations that have a relationship with two concepts in life that are in pairs. These concepts can normally involve the male to female relationship or family to career relationship. Normally, the information is collected from the 11 web IATs which has a data of over twelve thousand respondents from each of the data sets. With the information certain conclusions are made concerning the test where the methods are well proofed to provide the right information (Banaji, 2001). Among the results it is discovered that there is sorting out of the trials from the test making sub sets that which does not yield the required distinct measures. For the valid IAT measures to be produced, it is also known that two or more items can be used from the test to represent each of the concepts in the test. Some of the measures in the test particularly the psychometric ones can not be altered while under the administration while running the test. Lastly there are several extraneous effects that are well identified by the task block of the test and they are well reduced by the use of the practice trials in the IAT test. If all this results are well analyzed and identified, the whole analysis may produce a validation construct that is valid and additional for the test and give out the best guidelines the users need in the guidelines of performing the IAT test. With the inline of the basic theories in the learning and representation of the test, it is also clearly known that the results found is to respond to the one key process which the same response of behavior is produced which is associated with the concepts that are not deeply connected. In relationship to this, the IAT procedure tally with the stimulus which is found and grouped into the super ordinate which is one of the four categories (Banaji & Nosek, 2004). The members of the super ordinate are well measured their strengths by categorizing the members’ speed categories. In the example to be explained below to strong categories of “good” and “bad” are used where they are relatively related creating a good correspondence in order to identify the categories used and presented creating the same response. With the IAT procedure in the methodology, there are five steps or blocks that are followed where by both the third and fifth steps give out the critical data. The following are the steps to be followed: Understanding and learning the dimensional concept It is always ethical to categorize all the items and sort them into their different positions in relation to their concepts in the super ordinate. For example in examining the face of the youth and the old people while grouping them to their right positions where the youth will be under the “young” and the old people are under the “Old” categories respectively. In the process of categorizing, this is majorly done by the use of the keyboard of a computer where the keyboard is well recorded and mapped into the correct super ordinate categories. Another example is that the “a” keyword can represent the “Old” category and the “;” keyword represents the “young” category. The stimulus of the above keywords will also be shown in the computer at the middle. Learning and understanding the dimensional attribute This is the stage of the respondents where they perform the same task by using the same two keys described in stage one to sort out the items in the test creating a pole dimension in each of the items. As an example two poles for “Bad” can be terrible and nasty while two poles for “Good” are beautiful or wonderful (Banaji, 2001). Pairing of the attribute concept With the third step, the two poles are combined to form the alternating trials which make the respondents like the face to be identified as “Young” or “Old”. This is then followed by the word “Good” or “Bad” which describe the face. In this step, the keyword “a” is very important in a manner that it responds to the two “Old” and “Good” categories while the “;” keyword responds to the other categories “Young and Bad”. The respondents in the trial will try to have around 20 trials while following the rules to the dot which is know as “practicing block”. With this there will be a brief pause which will be followed by another lock of 40 trials which is called as the critical block. Switching of the concept locations that are spatial With the fourth step, it mostly needs the stimulus that will have the target concept on the two poles, “Old and Young” where they perform 20 trial blocks where by the test is done reversely. With the example given previously the “Old” will now have the “;” key on the keyboard computer and the “Young” will have the “a” key. Deeper paring of the concept attribute Lastly, this stage needs a good task of sorting items from the target attribute while their keys represented by the “young” and “Good” poles where by they are both given one key while the “Old” and “Bad” given the other key. This is the opposite of the other blocks as shown from the previous second stage (Banaji, 2001). The respondents in the test then sorts their stimulus with the 20 trials then followed by 40 another trials. The effect of the IAT test is well calculated by combining the latency data from both stage three and five. In order to get the stimulus faster of the given example, when the situation of Old and Bad have the same key with Young and Good, there is normally a reverse paring where which creates a good bond within old and bad as compared to the mapping that is reverse also of Young in relative to Old. In the description of the scoring algorithm there are calculations which are related to the average response of the latency that is in between the two condition of the scenario. The average latency of the two conditions then divided by the standard deviation which includes all the latencies of the tasks in the condition of “Good” and “Bad”. The score of the IAT which is the D becomes a cousin to the Cohen’s calculations of the “d”. Aims of the study This study clearly gives out specific aims that address the IAT test. There are several aims for the IAT but four of them are the major ones. One of the major reasons is to identify whether the analytic methods in the test separate the IAT’s relative association in terms of strength where it is measured in association strength. There is an appearance in the context that the assessments are shown in a particular influence. With the results of the IAT, there is a show that the test gives an answer to several groups having comparison over each other. It is also given a notion to be measuring as a relative measure where it is able to achieve or acquire assessments from several concepts that are single (Bargh, 2014). This can be well understood from the concept of the Democrats liking other Democrats while assessing from a group that is outside the delegation. For example if it happens that the Democrats happens to dislike the republicans, then it means that there was evaluation which was done in a separate manner that the in group and out group was done in a separate manner. In the study on some subsets of the IAT test, there have been new ways of understanding the evaluations with the two target concepts in the test. There are no clear results on the aim permit of the task where in the first step of the taste it is only the analytical strategy which is justified empirically. Another aim of the test study is to identify whether there is a number of stimulus which is needed in the IAT test categories. In presenting each category of the IAT test, there is an arbitrary number of the stimulus needed in order to come up with the best examples in the test. With the study of the IAT test, we are able to determine the number of the items used in creating a category. The same item used in the creation of the category is used in the measures identification whether they fit in identifying exemplars to be used in the test. The third aim is to identify if the measure from the test output is affected by the order of the IAT taste along with the reports that are self within the test. Some of the studies that use the IAT and the self reports, the study materials to be used are always presented by making decisions. This includes the Meta analysis where the correlation of the test and the self report tend to be strongest especially when the self report comes first. These assumptions are only made based on the comparisons from two or three different experiments and not the conditions realised in the experiments (Campbell & Fiske, 2014). With the fourth aim is to identify whether the order of the performance block that is unwanted can be reduced. From understanding the uses of the IAT test, it is known that its effect always tend to bend into the stronger strengths where the pairs are associative creating a pair that may be part of the first or second tasks combined in the IAT test. By giving an example it is well known that for the age participants, if it was first chosen to be Old and Bad then followed by Young then Good, then the reverse of the results show a stronger configuration that will favor the Young over the Old. The study in stage four tries to reduce the extraneous influence by using a procedural design change. Methods Respondents’ characters They were found openly on the internet through the media, links from other websites, being invited by other friend, by use of the search engines like Google and through invitation by using the mouth. Data was collected carefully from other online IAT website in the specified period of time. 90 percent of the respondents completed the tasks, whereby 30 percent were female and the other 70 percent were males. In regard to the country attendance, U.K was the top with 60 percent, followed by Indians by 20 percent. The other countries had a slight percentage of less than 5 percentages each. Materials and Apparatus With the tests, they were presented by using the internet where a technology of java was used. An applet from java was downloaded by the respondents to their computers. In order for the presentation of the stimuli, the respondents’ computers were used in the resources collection. This could also record the latencies due to the high speed of internet connection which improved the performance and accuracy of the measurements. Implicit Measures There was a measure in the diversity of getting the attitudes and stereotypes in the different social targets of the internet. Some of the concepts used in the measure were; Stereotype of the Ethnic national Race attitude Skin color attitude Sexual orientation Gender academic And the age attitude Results From the results obtained from the class, it is clear that formats used in the IAT test can not be undone by use of the analytical methods. Even when one focuses on the sun sets of the trials, still no effect is realised other than the relative strength of the strengths that is realised. This ensures that the categories rather participants to be in the test are the appropriate ones where they must be under the appropriate comparisons. There is also an effect realised at the stimulus sets where there are only labels of categories in the test. Where there is two or more stimulus at a category there is a less effect on the robustness (Campbell & Fiske, 2014). The pragmatics dictates the number of stimulus to be used in a category where the ideal number per category is four where two is sufficient. The concept of interest is greatly increased when the number of stimulus in the sub category is most effective. Conclusion In conclusion, there is a strong link between the theory and the science methods used in the IAT taste which leads to the introduction of many methods that are examined in the development of the theory. There is an increase in efficiency in answering the questions that are methodological creating collective research that is of importance. In the study there is a data presentation where there is a pragmatic research of the design, analysis and its implications. On top of that there is an interpretation of the Implicit Association Test which is quite important in the paper. There is a lot to study concerning the test but so far the paper analyses the theoretical part of the test exploration in regard to the implicit cognition of the social part. References Baccus, J. R., Baldwin, M. W., & Packer, D. J. (2004). Increasing im-plicit self-esteem through classical conditioning. Psychological Sci-ence, 15(7), 498-502. Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In H. L.Roediger, III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. Surprenant (Eds.), Thenature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 117-150). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Banaji,M. R.,&Nosek, B. A. (2004). Implicit racial identity, attitude, andself-esteem. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University. Bargh, J. A. (2014). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer(Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Blair, I. V. (2002). Themalleability of automatic stereotypes and prej-udice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-261. Blair, I. V.,Ma, J., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away:The moderation of automatic stereotypes through mental imag-ery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828-841. Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking theperfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and theelephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79,631-643. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D.W. (2014). Convergent and discriminantvalidation by themultitrait- multimethodmatrix. Psychological Bul-letin, 56, 81-105. Read More