Nobody downloaded yet

Critically discuss the importance of an understanding of the philosophy of mind for the modern psychologist - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The fact that psychology as a discipline can be traced back to its origins in philosophy pretty much already proves the statement that knowing philosophy in general is crucial for any modern psychologist. However, as far as philosophy is probably the origin of all possible…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.2% of users find it useful
Critically discuss the importance of an understanding of the philosophy of mind for the modern psychologist
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Critically discuss the importance of an understanding of the philosophy of mind for the modern psychologist"

Download file to see previous pages specifically through the lens of philosophy of mind, it becomes obvious that each and every branch of psychology has its own set of views from philosophy of mind; and this is not strange, because psychology as a discipline investigates human mind and how it influences human behavior. Thus knowledge of philosophy of mind is of crucial importance for any modern psychologist if he is willing to become a specialist in his realm.
The most notable fact concerning the philosophy of mind is that the term ‘mind’ doesn’t have any precise and doubtless definition, even though human mind has been explored by multiple scientists a very long time ago. The problems of investigation of mind were first set up in Ancient Greece by one of the most prominent Greek philosophers Plato. Ever since the main issue of the philosophy of mind has got a lot of explanations, was separated into two major schools depending on the point of view of relation between mind and body, which are monism and dualism, and acquired multiple interpretations.
Thus the most important problem of the entire branch of philosophy is the mind-body one; within the scopes of exploration of the problem philosophers have tried and are still trying to figure out whether mind and body are the two parts of a human being or whether they are two separated substances temporarily and circumstantially related to each other. Dualists’ point of view of the problem was formulated by Rene Descartes, who thought that the world consists of two different substances: mind and matter (Hart, 1996). Thus it turns out that, according to dualists, mind has its specific nature that is not really related to the physical body, because matter, which a body is made of, also has its own nature. The important thing in the relation between philosophical dualists is that their separation of mind and body makes mind a separated object of exploration for psychologists. If a psychologist accepts that mind and body are separated, it becomes ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Critically discuss the importance of an understanding of the Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Critically Discuss the Importance of an Understanding of the Essay)
“Critically Discuss the Importance of an Understanding of the Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Critically discuss the importance of an understanding of the philosophy of mind for the modern psychologist

Modern Philosophy

...?1a. In Primary Truths provides an account of the nature of truth. How does Leibniz argue for this account of truth? Explain some main consequences Leibniz derives from it in Primary Truths or in Monadology. (Paragraphs in Mondalogy are indicated as ‘p’.) Leibnitz develops several important principles in the Monadology that lie at the basis of his philosophy. After reducing substances to the concept of monads, in paragraph 18 and by them establishes the principle of self-sufficiency, such that a thing is the source of itself and is hence self-sufficient. His course is toward a definition of truth and to get to it he establishes principles of self-identity along with the principle of self-sufficiency....
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Philosophy of Mind

...Philosophy of the Mind There is a belief that the standard notions of rationality are not necessarily perfect. Searle believes that it is more like the tracks of a train, with each point having its own desires and beliefs and the rules that determine the conclusion that one comes up with. He adds that it is not reason that compels somebody to do anything because have enough reason wills a person to do something but it does not force him to do it (Searle, p.26). In all decisions that we have to make therefore, there exists a gap between the actions that we take and the reasons for it. It is this gap, according to Searle that makes individuals believe that they have the freedom of will. In his observation...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Philosophy of the Mind

...? Thomas Nagel presents a seemingly complicated formulation in understanding our point of view as a general concept in relation to the more personal and the subjective point of view. There are primarily three kinds of reason according to Nagel which is the subjective and then the two kinds of objective reasons where one is agent-relative and the other is agent-neutral. The universality of reason in the foundation that what is believed to be true in one place is also true anywhere as expressed in what he calls ‘view from nowhere’ is the basis of his proposition. There are always reasons which are universal and explain why we do the things that we do and there are varied aspects to this reason which ranges from the concept of view... and...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Philosophy of the Mind

...and separate existence. Aristotle has therefore provided a more distinct and complex understanding of the relationship between the body and the soul, but as portrayed in his reasoning, the soul is not eternal but only generated thus a fundamental subject of time. It may then be objective to say argue that Aristotle had functionalism ideologies. Functionalism may be defined as antithesis of the concept of dualism that states that human person mind is non existent and does not believe in the existence of mental states that are in apparent similarity to physical states. Such notion is broadly acknowledged among the modern day philosophers, However, owing to their total concern about the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Admission/Application Essay

Philosophy of mind

... ought to be the defining property of the mind. As another prospect, the distinction is intended to illustrate how humans are quite disposed to pay attention to competencies and deficiencies in the process of acquiring truths instead of the truths or propositions themselves and the nature thereof. It is Ryle’s aim as well to present the similarities and dissimilarities between ‘knowing how’ and ‘knowing that’ in order to substantiate further his findings upon the claim that the ‘intellectualist legend’ is false. In general, Ryle points out herein that “efficient practice precedes the theory” or that ‘knowing how’ comes before ‘knowing that’. According to Ryle, theorists have often acknowledged the so-called ‘intellectualist legend... the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Philosophy of mind

... similar with those of the brain to enable any mechanism to produce intentionality. Hence, a machine should have a human-like brain to be able to think. Lastly, he explains that what follows to his propositions 2 and 4 is the proposition (5) that any literal attempt to create intentionality through artificial way would fail to do so if it will only design programs like the AI; what it needs to succeed is to recreate the human brain’s causal powers. As I understand, the first proposition which he assumes to be an “empirical fact about the causal relations between mental processes and brains,” (p. 417) implies two more specific propositions, as follows: (1a) Human beings and even animals have intentionality, and what made them have... fully...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Philosophy of mind (Cognition)

...Although a subset of the area of philosophy known as metaphysics, the study of the fundamental nature of reality, the philosophy of mind has clear and undeniable connections with the second fundamental mode of enquiry belonging to philosophy known as epistemology, the study of knowledge. With its central place in philosophy—embedded in between the two most basic theoretical sciences—the philosophy of mind possess a grand importance in deciding various issues relating to psychology, biology, physics, and more. In the past few centuries, since the introduction of the mind/body problem, philosophers have resorted to changing entire metaphysical schemes in order to fit the newest levels of discourse relating to mind and consciousness... any and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Philosophy mind and world

...and conclusion whereas Heidegger’s philosophy demands deep understanding of metaphysics in order to decipher the same distinction between the self and its existence. Philosophy Mind and World ‘Next I Examined Attentively What I Was’ Descartes and Heidegger Descartes offers proof in the discourse in his arguments of the six meditations in which he explains the distinction between mind and body while Heidegger elucidates the self on the basis of metaphysics. It can be argued that Rene Descartes has been more successful in undertaking the task of...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Philosophy of mind

...The Dualistic Approach to the Body-Mind Problem Philosophy Essay November 15, Introduction The mind–body question in philosophy investigates the connection between mind and matter, and precisely the correlation between consciousness and the physical brain. Premises used in the mind-body debate largely revolve around two predominant concepts. One concept concerns the nature of human beings, and whether human beings comprise only material or if they are made of mind and matter. The second concern involves the relationship between these components. This paper looks at one of the perspectives of this...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The Philosophy of Mind

...of the Meditations. The movement against faith in the senses, and specifically against the belief that bodies are the same as sensations, is an important instrument in realising this objective, because Descartes believes the simple understanding of the physical world is mostly rooted in the notion that bodies are the same as people’s sensations (Morton 99). Descartes started his pursuit of truth by using his newly developed method of inquiry. His method used intense scepticism—all ideas that are doubtful were disregarded, including ancient wisdom taught by scholasticism. More critically, Descartes also doubted ideas coming from the senses because “from time to time I have found that the...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Critically discuss the importance of an understanding of the philosophy of mind for the modern psychologist for FREE!

Contact Us