Reading responds - Essay Example

Reading response April 18, Reading response Response to Sarah’s post Your post identifies strong defense for the LGBTQ and appears to be an honest position on the sexual orientation because of the portrayed self-awareness on sexuality. You questioned your sexuality and understood it but despite this, you still respect diversity in sexual orientation and seem to understand things that members of the LGBTQ community undergo. While you condemn people and the law that may be discriminating against the LGBTQ community and state morality as your basis, analysis of moral theories may not support your position.

Morality relates to values in a society and using it to defend members of the LGBTQ community should understand the need for a population to defend its values. Were sexual practices of the LGBTQ the originally predominant practices or did they just emerge to contradict sexual values in the society? If the LGBTQ emerged to contradict values long-term values of the society then it would be moral to support the society in attempt to defend its values, though in a more tolerant way. Advocacy against discrimination is therefore necessary but support for the LGBTQ community may not be the moral approach, based on traditional beliefs on sexuality.

Deontological theory of morality supports need to obey existing laws and this means that as long as existing laws limit desires of members of the LGBTQ population, such desires are not ethical. In addition, desires such as marriages and adoption of children by members of the LGBTQ members could only be beneficial to the individuals but could be harmful to many other members of the society, contrary to expectations of utilitarian ethics (Truscott and Crook, 2013). Defending the LGBTQ population against discrimination, but not advocating for their recognition, is therefore a more moral position.

Response to Shannon’s postThe post offers a personal experience on a LGBTQ life and identifies challenges that members of the community face. It offers an insight into how members of other sexual orientations should interact with members of the LGBTQ community. The post explains that becoming a member of the LGBTQ is not a choice and that it may have adverse effects on other members of the society, such as a person’s close friends and relatives, in as much as discrimination against members of the LGBTQ community causes them harm.

This identifies diversified interests that people should consider, with a lot of tolerance, in the debate over LGBTQ. Just as it is necessary to focus on effects of discrimination against members of the LGBTQ community, it is also important to focus on possible harms that family members and friends my experience when their loved one become a member of the LGBTQ community. A parent may suffer from stress and stigma into such health complications as cardiovascular disease and die because of discovering his or her child’s sexual orientation that the parent did not expect.

Forcing such a parent to respect the child’s orientation while he or she is going to die because of the situation raised moral questions and whenever greater harm can be identified, a case can be said to be unethical (Truscott and Crook, 2013). Tolerance is therefore necessary and people from both divides of sexual orientation should seek to support each other in order to reduce possible conflicts. ReferenceTruscott, D. and Crook, K. (2013). Ethics for the practice of psychology in Canada, revised and explained edition.

Ontario: University of Alberta.