Gender and Social Issues - Book Report/Review Example

Critical Analysis & Critique of The Gendered Society by Michael Kimmel (2007) in Relation to the Psychology of Women Submitted By: Enter Your First and Last Name Submitted To: Professor L.S. Vega-Rodriguez, Ph.D. PSY 3312 Psychology of Women Troy University – eTROY Global Campus Enter the Date Submitted _________________________________ I. Introduction Preface The book focuses on gender and social issues surrounding men and women. The objectives, goals and purposes for critiquing the selected book is to get a clear understanding of how Kimmel argues about the differences and similarities between men and women. All my objectives for critiquing the book were achieved. The selected book, “The Gendered Society” is a an essential source of information, and it is a key content for both researchers and students who wish to learn about gender related issues. Significance to Gender Studies The selected book helped greatly in reducing the widening gap between the male and female genders in various ways. For example, when Kimmel writes that both genders (men and women) are not inverse or different genders, rather he suggests that they be neighboring genders (Kimmel, 2007). The book is significant in that it shows how gender needs to appreciate and respected in the society. Equity need to be observed in the society today. Overview of Contents (Part II - Part IV) The book begins by noting that all societies impart the thought that men and ladies are distinctive and that the coherent expansion of this suspicion is that sex contrasts cause the clear favoritisms between the genders. He states that the converse is right; gender bias causes the contrasts between men and ladies. Gender is not essentially a quality inborn in every person . It is profoundly inserted in the public eyes principal establishments: the family, school, and the work environment. The issues encompassing sexual orientation are unpredictable, and with a specific end goal to illuminate them, the creator has incorporated an audit of the existing writing in related trains, for example, science, human studies, brain research and humanism. At last, with an eye towards whats to come, the author offers bookworms a sight at sexual orientation relations in the one millennium from now. II. Comparative Analysis Limitations in Linking to PSY 3312 Psychology of Women Everyone acknowledges that there are significant differences between males and females, even if he or she are only physical. Others see not only the physical but also the social, emotional and intellectual differences between male and female. Gender roles by definition are the social norms that dictate what socially appropriate male and female behavior is. In early American culture, it was common for a womens job to be a submissive homemaker in clear contrast to the males’ aggressive breadwinner role. For example, the seventies marked the beginning of the Womans Movement and the end of the ideals we held on what it is to be a man and what it is to be a woman. Women were no longer like the stereotypical homemaker, always offering a hot meal for her family, but were instead out burning bras and protesting inequality. No one disputes that the Womens Movement began, but there is a disagreement on whether or not it should come to an end. Half the Human Experience: The Psychology of Women (Hyde & Else-Quest 2013). Strengths in Linking to PSY 3312 Psychology of Women The author identifies “inadequate funding for education, inadequate health care for children and adults, inadequate corporate policies regarding parental leave, and ‘family unfriendly’ workplaces — with inflexible hours, rigid time schedules, and lack of on-site child care facilities” (Kimmel 2007, p. 148) as contributing to the maintenance of“gendered division of household labor that reproduces male domination in society” (Kimmel 2007, p. 148). This theme is reiterated from another angle in “The Gendered Workplace.” One of Kimmel’s goals in this book is “to build upon the feminist approaches to gender by also making masculinity visible” (Kimmel 2007, p. 5) in order to illuminate an “understanding [of] men as gendered” (Kimmel 2007, p. 6). This attempt becomes one of the strengths of the book and is demonstrated in the ways Kimmel reveals the effects on men of current gender expectations and arrangements. Half the Human Experience: The Psychology of Women (Hyde & Else-Quest 2013). Summary of Part II Feminists surmise that sex is absolutely a shared build and that ought to be no biotic impact regarding the matter of assigning out men and ladies work. As stated by them men exploit their physical quality that there is almost no biotic impact in the matter of sex parts. As stated by them men exploit ladies in light of the fact that they are frail physical. In any case, they accept that both men and ladies ought to be judged in understanding to the educated limit. They likewise accept it is the promulgation spread by men that will ladies ought to stay at home, while men search for bread. Feminists have a low presumption of men and "manliness." They contend that men are rough and testy on account of their manliness, However, this is not correct on the grounds that the majority of these ladies case to be championing correspondence however as a general rule they battling for the set benchmarks to be brought down.In conclusion, what most of the feminism are fighting for are anti-male agenda .Half the Human Experience: The Psychology of Women (Hyde & Else-Quest 2013). In practice when it comes to the constitution, the gender roles have been defined well. Therefore following the law then gender balance can be achieved. III. Analysis Using the “RICA” Method Overview of the “RICA” Approach to Critical Thinking In the “RICA” Method of Critical Thinking & Analysis, It is said that men originate from diverse planets (men from Mars, ladies from Venus), that men and ladies have distinctive mind sciences and hormones and that men and women tune in, talk, , and even characterize ethics contrastingly. How is it that men and ladies live together, take the same classes in school, consume the same food, read the same books, and accept evaluations as stated by the same criteria? In this book, Michael S. Kimmel inspects essential convictions about sex, contending that men and ladies are more much the same in contrast to the common belief. Reflection (Pre- and Post-Rumination) Before participating in the critical analysis of this book, I was aware of the topic in hand. However, after engaging in the topic and analysis, I acquired a deeper insight about the book. What is entailed, the differences and similarities between the two gender and whatever else covered clearly developed in me. Integration (Comprehension) He puts forth three strong and convincing expressions about gender. To begin with, he exhibits that sex contrasts are regularly to a great degree overstated; indeed, he contends that men and ladies have considerably more in as a relatable point than people might suspect they do. He additionally challenges the pop clinicians who propose that gender difference is the reason for bias between the genders; rather, he uncovers that the opposite is accurate -sex disparity itself is the reason for the contrasts between men and ladies. At long last, he represents that sex is not only a component of a singular character, however, a socially developed institutional marvel. Previously, I thought that women were bit subject to men. However, with Kimmel saying that men and women are equal, I have learnt that none of the genders is subject to the other. However, respect of the two genders need to be greatly observed (Kimmel, 2007). Connection (Interconnectivity) The most interrelated links discovered between the CTBR book and the selected book is all based on gender and women. No gender should be subject to the other what so ever. Both genders are equal and must be respected. It shows up like the author endeavors to downplay the vitality of gender in deciding a portion of the reported contrasts between men and ladies in regards to fellowship and adoration; yet, he likewise states in the wake of examining kinship styles of lesbians and gay men that "sex, not sexual introduction, is frequently the key determinant of our cozy encounters" (p. 213). The exertion to downplay sexual orientation contrasts in a few cases has a go at the cost of giving attractive clarifications of sex socialization. Not at all like past sections where Kimmel presents a strong defense for how institutional sex biases style sexual orientation contrasts, in this part the structural illustrations offered are misled and moreover fail to offer a satisfactory mental part (Kimmel, 2007). Application (Real-World Relevance) Part I looks at the most recent work in science, human studies, brain research, and humanism; Part II gives an unique investigation of the gendered universes of family, instruction, and work, and Part III concentrates on the gendered associations of sexuality, love, adoration, sexuality, and brutality. This shows how well the chose CTBR book and the PSY 3312 course reading, Half the Human Experience: The Psychology of Women (Hyde & Else-Quest 2013) cross section with this present reality past academics. In other words, the total value of the content leant after the study is of high impact to the society today. Gender equity and equality is taught in this book. One learns how to relate and coexist with the neighboring gender (Kimmel, 2007). IV. Conclusions Major Findings The book addresses issues such as “Are men and ladies truly from distinctive planets? How are they different? What do these contrasts mean? Can anyone explain why each social order recognizes individuals on the premise of gender? Can anyone explain why essentially every known social order is additionally dependent upon male mastery? These are inquiries that have enamored social researchers for eras and these are the inquiries that The Gendered Society Reader endeavors to reply. This spectator furnishes learners with a feeling of the different talks on gender that have been processed by an extensive variety of controls including the organic sciences, social research, therapy, developmental brain science, and humanism. Composed as a friend volume to Kimmel’s course book, The Gendered Society, this second release concentrates on the two significant issues in gender studies – gender contrast and male command (Kimmel, 2007). For Instance, The author considers gender, both inside the scholarly world and in regular lives. Michael S. Kimmel challenges the claim that sex is constrained to ladies encounters. His urging and adjusted investigation of gender incorporates both manly and ladylike points of view. Part 1 analyzes the most recent work in science, human sciences, brain research, and humanism; Part 2 gives a unique investigation of the gendered universes of family, training, and work; and Part 3 investigates gender collaborations, including kinship and adoration, sexuality, and savagery (Kimmel, 2007). Kimmel puts forth three striking and powerful expressions about sexual orientation. In the first place, he shows that gender contrasts are regularly amazingly misrepresented; indeed, he contends that men and ladies have a great deal more in like manner than people might suspect they do. He likewise challenges the pop analysts who suggest that gender contrast be biased between the genders; rather, he uncovers that the opposite is accurate -sex favoritism itself is the contrasts between men and ladies. At long last, he outlines that sex is not just a part of singular personality, yet a socially developed institutional marvel that supports guys and is profoundly unequal (Kimmel, 2007). Before the end of the book, the author leaves the different impression that, as a social order, men and ladies can improve ,and he provides for the devices to achieve it (Kimmel, 2007). Emphasizing an opportune new section on gender, governmental issues and politics, the fifth version of the book investigates current considering gender, both inside the scholarly world and in our commonplace lives. The author challenges the claim that gender is restricted to ladies encounters -his forcing and adjusted investigation of sex incorporates both manly and ladylike viewpoints (Kimmel, 2007). He puts forth three strong and convincing expressions about gender. To begin with, he exhibits that sex contrasts are regularly to a great degree overstated; indeed, he contends that men and ladies have considerably more in as a relatable point than people might suspect they do. He additionally challenges the pop clinicians who propose that gender difference is the reason for bias between the genders; rather, he uncovers that the opposite is accurate -sex disparity itself is the reason for the contrasts between men and ladies. At long last, he represents that sex is not only a part of a singular character, though, socially developed institutional marvel (Kimmel, 2007). Essential reading for both people and researchers, The Gendered Society, Fifth Edition, is a legitimate, sharp, and vivacious proclamation about contemporary gender relations from one of the countrys first masterminds on the subject (Kimmel, 2007). Frustrated at the deficiency of materials accessible for him to allocate to scholars in his courses on the social science of gender, Kimmel, a humanism teacher at the State University of New York, Stony Brook, has composed overview of the scholastic writing that ought to serve his reasons pleasantly, despite the fact that this book will be overwhelming trying for anybody for whom it is not recommended for. His auxiliary inspiration is to counter the “imaginary pseudoscientific cases” of prevalent essayists who teach that men and ladies are from diverse planets: Kimmel writes that men and women are not inverse genders. However, he suggests that both genders (men and women) be neighboring genders. In sections that will plainly serve as units on a syllabus, Kimmel (Manhood in America; Changing Men) surveys, from a feminist-accommodating viewpoint, flow investigate on how gender influences science, sexuality, the family, child rearing, marriage, the working environment, the classroom and brutality. His theory that is that gender contrast is the result of sex imbalance, and not the other way round prompts the conclusion that the social order of the third thousand years will progressively de-gender characteristics, traits, behaviors and practices without de-gendering individuals. Although the author’s stress is every now and again on the need of changing manliness, the unfinished second a large portion of the sex upheaval of the twentieth century, he is circumspect in looking after equalization and exhaustiveness, examining the lives of both (Kimmel, 2007). Efficacy of the “RICA” Method of Critical Thinking The overall effectiveness and value of analyzing the book, “RICA” Method of Critical Thinking is for academic and personal growth, as well as a tool of self-discovery. The book honestly teaches how genders must and need to be equalized and respected. “RICA” Method of Critical Thinking, it is not all about the general society to respect gender. However, it must start from within an individual (Kimmel, 2007). Newer Insights & Self-Discoveries The book looks at current contemplating gender, both inside the educated community and in our regular lives. Through an examination of current work in science, social studies, brain research, and humanism (in Part I), a unique dissection of the gendered universes of family, training, and work (in Part II), and the gendered connections of fellowship and affection, sexuality, and roughness (in Part III), the author makes three cases about sexual orientation. In the first place, he contends that the contrasts between men and ladies are not as extraordinary as people regularly envision, and that truth be told ladies and men have much more in common as each other than people might suspect they do. Second, he challenges the thoughts of a lot of people pop analysts who recommend that sexual orientation distinction is the reason for the emotional detectable bias between the genders. Rather, the author uncovers that the converse is accurate: sexual orientation is the contrast between ladies and men (Kimmel, 2007). References N– Remove this paragraph before submitting. Hyde, Janet S. & Else-Quest, Nicole (2013) Half the Human Experience: The Psychology of Women, 8th edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company (Cengage). Kimmel M. (2007).The Gendered Society .USA: Oxford University press Read More