Same Sex Parents: The Psychological Effect on Children - Research Paper Example

The last issue highlighted is the idea that there really is no reason why a society should be altered in terms of the government’s traditional attitudes toward marriage and family if it is working pretty well now. With much still to be decided, the homosexual marriage reached new heights in 2004, starting with President Bush's State of the Union Address. "Activist judges . have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives," he said.

"On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard." A few weeks later, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that homosexuals have a state constitutional right to marry. Shortly thereafter, the mayor of San Francisco, in a particularly disturbing display of civil disobedience, began marrying again, homosexuals, and act a mayor in upstate New York quickly copied. As Mr. Bush forewarned, the public backlash against such reckless disregard for the legal process has been swift and politically brutal.

Is it the notion that homosexuals can get "married," or the way in which public officials have allowed them to do so? Advocates of homosexual "marriage" would prefer the debate to focus on the former. If it's simply a matter of old-fashioned thinking, then public officials have a moral duty to act as righteously as they please. Clearly, this helps explain why they chose to run roughshod over any legal impediments, believing their cause to reside on the same pedestal as the abolitionists' and civil-rights activists' of America's past.