Role in Criminal Procedure of US Constitution - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
This paper “Role in Criminal Procedure of US Constitution” aims to understand the impact and relevance that the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights have on the organization of the modern criminal procedure. The author determines two important elements of criminal procedure - the jury and venue…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.1% of users find it useful
Role in Criminal Procedure of US Constitution
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Role in Criminal Procedure of US Constitution"

US Constitution and Its Role in Criminal Procedure Outline The US Constitution and the Bill of Rights incorporatecrucial points to American criminal procedure.
2. In the US Constitution, Article III, Section. 2, Clause 3 describes the elements of venue and method of criminal procedure.
3. In the Bill of Rights, Amendment V explains such incorporations as type of punishment, double jeopardy, self-incrimination and the right for judicial process.
4. Amendment VI deals with the rights of a defendant such as information, public and speedy trial, having an attorney, witnesses in one’s favor and confronting those witnessing against one.
5. Amendment VIII deals with the concept of bail for a defendant.
The United States of America is recognized as possessing one of the most defined criminal procedures in the world. This is subjected to the heavy reliance of the procedure on the primary documents that ensure the statehood of the country, which are the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights that includes Amendments demonstrating the changes and development of American democracy throughout centuries. Both the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights have specific parts that contain text relevant to defining criminal procedure. The rights that are being indicated within the documents include pre-trial rights, trial rights and rights that are not specified in time and being applied throughout the proceeding. Currently, there is an ongoing debate about how corresponding and up to date this conformity is and whether it is necessary to include changes in criminal procedure. This paper aims to understand the impact and relevance that the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights have on the organization of the modern criminal procedure in the US.
In the US Constitution itself, there is an Article that includes provision for both pre-trial and trial rights. Article III, Section. 2, Clause 3 indicates that “[t]he Trial of all Crimes […] shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed […]” (National Archives, “Constitution of the United States, Art.III, §.2, cl.3”, 1787) This passage determines two important elements of criminal procedure, namely the jury and venue. These are crucial while they describe the place and method of criminal procedure.
As for the Bill of Rights, there are several Amendments that are relevant to the current research question. To be more specific, Amendments Fifth, Sixth and Eight seem to be the most important to determining criminal procedure. Within the Fifth Amendment, there are several crucial points to understand in regard to criminal procedure. First, this Amendment rejects punishment for capital or infamous crimes except for specific cases. Similarly, in the Eight Amendment, it is stated that “[e]xcessive bail shall not be required”, nor “excessive fines, nor cruel and unusual punishments.” (National Archive, “Bill of Rights, Amendment VIII”, 1789) Second, Amendment V also indicates that one person will not be answering twice for the same crime. Third, any person has the right not to witness against oneself. Finally, the Amendment does not allow the punishment of a person without due juridical process. (National Archive, “Bill of Rights, Amendment V”, 1789). The Sixth Amendment, likewise, provides the right of “speedy and public trial” for any person. (National Archive, “Bill of Rights, Amendment VI”, 1789) Moreover, this Amendment also states that the defendant has the right to be informed of the accusation and have witnesses in one’s favor and confront those witnessing against one. Most importantly, it allows the defendant to have “the Assistance of Counsel” to defend one.
To understand the importance of the Amendments to the criminal procedure, it is possible to summarize that they describe such elements as venue, confrontation, self-incrimination, double jeopardy, as well as rights of the defendant including information, publicity and speedy trial, due process, bail, attorney, witnesses in one’s favor. These elements, similarly to those that are found within the Article III of the US Constitution, are extended in time meaning that they are of both pre-trial and trial nature.
In summary, the research obviously indicates the importance of impact that the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights have on criminal procedure. Moreover, it is possible to state that the basis of the procedure is based upon the separate parts of these two documents since they describe such elements as venue, method and organization of the trial, pre-trial procedure, as well as major defendant’s rights. The major parts of the documents that are important for criminal procedure are Article III of the US Constitution and Amendments V, VI and VIII of the Bill of Rights.
National Archives. (1789). Bill of Rights. The Charters of Freedom. Retrieved August 27, 2015, from
National Archives. (1787). Constitution of the United States. The Charters of Freedom. Retrieved August 27, 2015, from Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Role in Criminal Procedure of US Constitution Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Role in Criminal Procedure of US Constitution Essay)
“Role in Criminal Procedure of US Constitution Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Role in Criminal Procedure of US Constitution

US constitution

...? Running head: US constitution. (US constitution) Components of the US government The United sconstitution was put into place over three centuries ago, 1787.It remains the most precise and oldest constitution found in a written form. This constitution, in America constitutes the supreme law. Initially, the United States constitution was composed of three branches defining the federal government; the Congress also referred to as the Legislature, Exercutive branch defining the presidency and the Judiciary constituted by the courts. Even though the three components remained...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Criminal procedure

...? Criminal procedure Crime control is an integral move to maintain order within the society. This is important especially that society nowadays is becoming sophisticated in almost every aspect (social, economic, politics etc). Thus, in this paper the proponent tries to analyze which among the due process and crime control model gives the people significant advantages and benefits in addressing their concerns. Regarding this, the proponent tries to compare and contrast the role of due process and crime control models on shaping criminal procedure policy. Thus, the analysis includes a review and assessment of the Amendments of the United States...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

US constitution the central government but maintaining its power in the state. The article also served as a printed document, which established varied functions for the state and national governments after the Declaration of Independence. The first draft of the Declaration of Independence was established in June 1776 after the day when the committees were appointed. The second draft of the articles was printed during the congress, which resolved to assign a committee for preparing a constitution for an associate type of union (Miller 23). The last draft was ratified in November 1777 in Pennsylvania and this was after a year of debate; thus the articles served as the function system of government used by the congress...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Criminal Procedure Variation

...Although we are all one united country, various laws and practices can vary from to One such of these laws is the use of the death penalty, and the various accordance with the law and carrying out of the death penalty. After various disagreements with the Supreme Court, Alabama passed the Death Penalty Act of 1981. This was in new agreement after the Supreme Court Case Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 (1980): which "Struck a portion of Alabama's death penalty law that blocked juries from convicting defendants of an included lesser offense rather than the capital crime itself; juries were required to either convict a defendant of the capital crime or to acquit him."( In was...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

US Constitution

...United s Constitution 16-09-11 The US ConstitutionThe American Constitution is the supreme Law of the United States. The seven articles of the constitution were written by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in the year 1787. Thus, the constitution is more than 200 years old and is in fact designated as the oldest constitution of the world. In accordance with the constitution, the Congress was partitioned into two houses and the United States Federal Government was divided into three branches known as the legislative, judicial and the presidential branch. The legislative branch has the power to formulate Laws while the other two braches do not have the right make Laws to prosecute citizens. The President is the head... of the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Criminal Procedure (Assignment 1)

...Harris Kamran Law Case Studies 24 October Due process of law According to the U.S. constitution, the term due process of law can be defined as the nature of the law and the reason for its implementation (Mount, 2010). That is to say, the due process has two parts: the procedural, and the substantive part (Mount, 2010). In the procedural part, the nature of the law is observed, and whether it is fair and impartial (Mount, 2010). The substantive part deals with the actual implementation of the law, and it can modify any mistakes in the procedural process (Mount, 2010). In general, then, due process affords ...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Criminal Procedure

.... A suspect should be suppressed since the constitution provides that police can question witnesses at crime scenes without reading them their Miranda rights, and should a witness implicate themselves in the crime during that questioning, their statements could be used against them later in court. Nonetheless, a suspect should not be suppressed since the same constitution protects suspects from self incrimination. The adjudication process of the criminal law differs due to jurisdiction. Generally though, it assumes the same format. The burden of proof is always on the prosecution in most countries with a democratic rule of law. The world ought to hold weight in the...
2 Pages(500 words)Article

US Constitution

...Supreme Court can interpret Constitution, participated in Revolution of 1800 and witnesses the peaceful transfer of powers. James Madison, 1751-1836, was the 4th president of the U.S. 1809-17, member of the Continental Congress; 1780-83. Republican Macon’s Bill No. 2: that allowed trade once more (1809-1817). James Monroe, 1758-1831, was the5th president of the U.S. (1817-25). Went to law school with Thomas Jefferson (1780-83) and was a member of the Virginia legislature (1782) as well as the Continental Congress (1783-86) (Madison, James, et al 1). Marshall’s Decisions: McCulloch vs. Maryland (1819) Bank of US can’t be taxed, Dartmouth College vs. Woodward (1819)-contract is highest law, Gibbon’s vs....
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure Introduction The book ‘A Matter of Interpretation’ by Antonin Scalia elaborates about the methodology used for interpreting and implementing the constitution legal principles upon the cases addressed in the US Supreme court1. The interpretation of written laws on the basis of which the legislators have framed is referred to as ‘textualism’. In this regard, the author is identified to be adherence to textaulism2;3. Contextually, the essay majorly focuses towards understanding the patterns of textualisation as described by ’Antonin Scalia’. Discussion In accordance with Justice Antonin Scalia, each and every constitutional law should be interpreted depending on the actual context and should not be subjected... to a specific...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Criminal Procedure Assignment

...Criminal Procedure Assignment Criminal Procedure Assignment In the three cases U.S.A. vs. Acevedo, U.S.A. vs. Chadwick and U.S.A.vs. Johnson, the court came out with different verdicts yet the cases were seen to have striking similarities. A summary of each case will be given in this paper and their similarities shown. Then, basing on the facts related to each case, the paper will explain why the court arrived at the different verdicts. U.S.A vs. Acevedo 500 U.S 565 (1991) held that police searching an automobile may only extend their search to a container inside the automobile without a warrant when they have probable cause to believe evidence or contraband is held in...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Role in Criminal Procedure of US Constitution for FREE!

Contact Us