Nobody downloaded yet

The Role Of The Judicial Branch In A Democracy - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The past ten years has seen an increase in the discussions over the role that judges and the judiciary as a whole plays in areas that deal with government policies as well as politics, areas that had previously been thought of as areas that legislators should be dealing with…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.6% of users find it useful
The Role Of The Judicial Branch In A Democracy
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Role Of The Judicial Branch In A Democracy"

Download file to see previous pages There are three branches making up a democracy and these are the legislature which not only sets out procedures that should be followed by the government but also ensures that the law is performed. The executive is the second branch of democracy and its main job is ensuring that policies are turned into action while the judiciary does the work of applying the law according to the procedures of justice that have been put in place while at the same time resolving any disagreements that might occur in the society. In order to ensure that there is freedom which is a one of the most important parts of democracy, it is necessary for these three powers to operate on their own but also act in a way that balances each other. Having the key values defining the law is what forms the groundwork for democracy since they help to constantly protect the constitution. These values also ensure that equality and civil rights and freedoms are always seen. Democracy is therefore thought to be one of the best types of government as a result of the clear separation that occurs between each of the arms of government. This is the reason why a judiciary that is independent in its actions is often seen as one of the best examples of a democracy that is working as it should be. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The Role Of The Judicial Branch In A Democracy Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(The Role Of The Judicial Branch In A Democracy Essay)
“The Role Of The Judicial Branch In A Democracy Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Role Of The Judicial Branch In A Democracy

Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances between the Executive and Judicial Branch

...been argued that Judicial review is one way which the self-interest of the president can be challenged, and likewise, it was argued that self-interest is one of the ways in which appointments are made by the Executive itself. However, this self-interest is challenged outside of both branches and that the Senate has an important role in checking the self-interest or factionalism of the President in his appointment of Supreme Court judges. The balance of powers is critical to democracy, and because it is a system where representatives serve the interest of the people. As representatives of the people and not the people themselves, their authorities are balanced by the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper

Judicial Process

... for sentencing, but they do not legally require the judge to sentence within the guidelines recommendations. Cases involving juveniles in adult courts by definition are atypical, this is because juvenile status represents a unique offender considerations, it may play as significant role in judicial decisions to individualize sentences through guidelines departures. Changes in legislation in different jurisdictions have lead to an increase in the dimensions of juvenile criminals transfer to adult courts. Nonetheless, age considerations have purposefully limited the degree of punishments given out to juvenile offenders based on the adult sentencing guidelines. Deviations from the guidelines offer a comprehensive analysis... ? Juvenile...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism

...Judicial Activism Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two terms which are bandied about on both sides of the spectrum. Conservatives decry judicial activism. They state that judges should not make law, only interpret the law. However, this is hypocrisy, because conservatives do not seem to mind activism when it comes to issues that they believe in. For instance, in Bush v. Gore, 531 US 98 (2000), which is the ultimate case of judicial activism, conservatives did not decry this case as being a case of judicial activism. But, if one reads the opinion, it is clear that the judges are straining to find reasons for the decision, and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Judicial Review

...the constitutional guarantees available to the General Public27.In 2002 the House of Lords ruled in Anderson28 that under the Human Rights Act 1998 and with respect to the doctrine of the rule of law the Home Secretary's traditional right of setting the tariff for prisoners convicted of murder could be no longer allowed to continue as this was an example of an arbitrary and unchecked exercise of power by a member of the executive. In the other case of the Director of Public Prosecutions of Jamaica v Mollison 29Lord Bingham described the effective mechanisms of judicial review upholding the notions of rule of law and the separation of powers as 'a characteristic feature of democracies'." The rule of law...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Judicial Precedents

...Judicial Precedents The great term 'precedent' could be seen in terms of established Court decisions. Judges need to try cases based on earlier decisions. As a matter of judicial practice, judges in lower courts need to observe the established precedents set by higher courts, and this establishes the hierarchy of decision-making. (Doctrine of Judicial Precedent & its Hierarchy of Court Essay 2002-2008). Hierarchy of Courts: If equal or higher Courts have set a precedent, except in exceptional circumstances, it may need to be observed, especially so when basic nature and fundamental character of cases remain the same. The Supreme Court rulings need to be observed by lower courts and are...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Judicial Decisions

...Have judicial decisions since 1945 sharpened or blurred the distinction between a lease and a licence The distinction between leases and licences stems from the distinction between the rights in rem and the rights in personam. Apart from various registration and procedural matters, leases and licences also have a more fundamental difference. Leases clearly make the tenant an owner, albeit temporarily, unless a contrary intention is evidenced in the agreement between the landlord and tenant. In order to understand and evaluate the role of post 1945 cases, some reference need to be made of earlier cases which have formed the basis of what the law is as it stands in the post Street V. Mountford era. The...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Judicial Precedent

...Judicial precedent: Judicial precedent an be defined a decision by court that is used to make decisions in the future, in any case a judge will set out facts of the case then state the law applicable and finally make decision regarding the case. It can also be defined as a system which provides principles for making decisions on case with similar facts and issue. These decision made by judges can be used for future judgment on similar case. However such judgment can only be binding to future decision if the case was based on facts and established law whereby later judgment are based on legal reasoning. Judicial precedent is important in that it helps in the development of new law. It has...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Judicial restraint and judicial activism

..., the doctrine of judicial restraint holds the assumption that the courts are supposed to submit to the decisions made by the executive and legislative branches. This is because the people elect the president and the members of the Congress and the federal judiciary members are not. The courts are also supposed to submit to the agency decisions and rules. In other words, under this doctrine, the courts are not supposed to hinder the implementation of agency rules and legislative acts unless they are precisely unconstitutional. For instance, many states before the case of Roe v. Wade held that abortion was illegal, regulated sodomy, made homosexual sodomy and adultery a crime (Bardes, Schmidt, and Shelley...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Is the Judicial Branch Still the Weakest Branch of Government

...). It is the legislature, which implements the laws and controls the money and, therefore, answerable to the public through elections. Conversely, the judicial branch neither implements laws nor directs money spent by the state. Therefore, from the arguments herein, even though it suffices that the judicial branch has limited powers and roles, this branch is essential and cannot be regarded as the weakest branch in the American government. Works Cited Alabana, Martin. "Brown vs. Board of Education Essay - Stormfront." Stormfront - White Nationalist Community. N.p., 7 July 2004. Web. 14 Apr. 2014....
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Taylor Branch

...or community. The second step is education; which entails informing all community stakeholders on an issue and your position on it. The third step involves personal commitment; which illustrates affirming faith in the methods and philosophy of non violence. The fourth procedure is negotiating; through confronting the other party with plans of resolving states injustices. The fifth step is direct action, where the opponent in brought on board in resolving disputes; finally the last step explains reconciliation through understanding and friendship with the opponent. Conclusion Dr. King’s accomplishment in the civil rights movement is beyond words. Without him, the United States of America may not have enacted the legislation that turned...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The Role Of The Judicial Branch In A Democracy for FREE!

Contact Us