Monster and environment - Essay Example

This paper is title ‘monster and environment; Environmental Rhetoric’ and it offers three environmental critiques. According to Cahn and O’Brien (131), the kind of thinking and talking that people have about the environment matters. Such thoughts and words reveal what the people value and shape their actions towards the environment. The emergence of environmental criticism was not architecture of environmental writers rather it has been due to a slow evolution of thought on physical world and nature.

There have been critiques of the humans’ relationship with nature and environment. The emergence of the industrial world extended the problem of environment and human relationship. The problem was of identifying the ideal equilibrium between preserving and controlling the nature. This problem increases with an increase of human knowledge on the physical world (Cahn and O’Brien, 131). Even though there has been an extended systematic concern for the environment, the world is yet to see a potentially good solution to environmental problems including environmental rhetoric.

Meister and Phyllis (01) argue that nature is a symbol in the popular human culture. The popular human culture teaches the emphasis of the ‘use value’ of nature. Humans simply learn both unconsciously and consciously from the popular culture and practice of consuming nature (Meister and Phyllis 01). However, contrary to Meister and Phyllis’s (02), while popular culture unquestionably helps humans understand many faces of nature, understanding the environmental face of nature has proven very difficult.

Or perhaps, humans understand environment but ignore its requirements. Often, popular culture redefines, manipulates and modifies thy symbol of nature in the life of human beings hence distorting the value and understanding of the environment. Therefore, the notion that if a capitalistic society subjects nature