The Anatomy of Classes - Essay Example

Where We Stand: Matters Introduction The book ‘Where We Stand - Matters’ written by Bell Hooks talks about the increasing the distinctionbetween the rich and the poor and how that aspect has affecting the capitalism in United States. The rest of the book talks about the fact how the class matter and affect the society. The reason for choosing this book is the simple fact that it is related to topic discussed by Paul Fussell in his article “An anatomy of the Classes” where even we has clearly mentioned that no matter what there will always be a distinction among the various classes where the rich will always remain rich and the poor will always be poor. However the case for Thorstein Veblen, he argued the differences of the working class and not of the society as a whole. Article Review Hooks in the rest of the book looks in to investigating latency even with class matters, and also the far reaching singular and aggregate disappointment to assume ownership over class disparity. She contends that our commitment as natives who want equity is to develop an ethic of solidarity with the poor that incorporates a pledge to living essentially and offering assets. Similarly as with huge numbers of her different books and expositions, Hooks’ examination of class coordinates reflection on her knowledge of intersection class limits as she moved from her position as a youngster from a working population family in an isolated dark neighborhood to her position as a tenured teacher and open erudite. A few book lovers may not like the way snares rehashes a few stories from individual encounter in the book, however as she notes, her attentiveness to class progress keeps on being formed by the reconsidering and retelling of her encounters . To be honest, Hooks duty to genuinely recognizing the significances of her political investigation for her particular life has dependably been one of the extraordinary qualities of her written work. By arranging her dialog in the setting of her moving connection to class benefit, snares epitomizes a focal claim in the book that genuine solidarity (instead of sympathy) with destitute is conceivable just through a readiness both to basically think about where each of us stands inside worldwide class chains of importance and to test class disparities through our movements. Consistent with snares, equity obliges a continuous attention of class molded by a difference that interdependency supports the life of the planet. In her exchanges of broad communications, consumerism, lodging, training, antiracism, and womans rights, hooks endeavors to show how both the nonappearance of solidarity with poor and working population individuals of all races and a scrutinize of class force has had a moderate impact on feminist and antiracist governmental issues. While noting that some revolutionary feminists and hostile to racists keep on contemplating the various class, hooks clarifies how class elites in both feminist and dark liberation developments have appropriated and eventually mutilated the dialect of liberation keeping in mind the end goal to secure their class advantaged status. Case in point, hooks examines how an accentuation on racial inspire has been utilized by the dark bourgeoisie, who have entry to white standard media, to deemphasize class progressive system inside dark groups and in this way to evade affirmation of how class benefit intervenes the ache of bigotry in their lives . Hooks studies a class-based social equality development that apparent integration as the way to racial inspire, noting that segregation or desegregation was the best approach to debilitate the aggregate radicalization of dark individuals that had been created by activist social equality and the dark force development. hooks accentuation all around the book on the significance of offering assets and wiping out class pecking order might as well make it clear to bookworms that she is not proposing that the tenet of differentiate however equivalent was in any method simply or desirable over an evenhanded circulation of assets. Rather, Hooks is concerned with a movement in neighborhood qualities occasioned by integration, a movement far from an ethic of communalism and to liberal independence and realism. As hooks makes clear, racial solidarity and elevate must be accomplished when the substances of class chains of importance inside dark groups educate dark liberation battles. Dissents of class progressive system and benefit inside oppressed aggregations at last sell out poor and working population individuals in oppressed groups. In her exchange of feminist legislative issues and class, hooks stresses how revolutionary womans rights captivates class contrasts in its scrutiny of patriarchy and how this work has appropriated far less consideration than "reformist womens liberation," which compares ladies strengthening with the accomplishment of class force. Strengths and Weaknesses The article however is very distinctive in itself and cannot replace the others cases discussed in the class. However it shares some similarities with the thoughts of Paul Fussells and they way he looks into classes. Both of the articles shares the idea that class distinction cannot be removed in any society no matter how advanced and broad minded the society becomes. The rich will always look down upon the poor and the poor people will depend on the rich person’s mercy. In this scenario I feel there is some negativity in the article. There was this feeling few years back but now gradually the feeling has changed over the years and the idea of an equal society is seen in most of the places. This can be considered as a weakness of the article. The strength of the article lies in the way the author has deeply studies the whole idea of classes and has described the same with the help of simple examples such as racism, the difference between blacks and whites. Conclusion After discussing the article it gives us an idea how the distinction of classes and the mental thinking of the society heavily affected the countries across of the world. Though we have the distinction till now in some of the cases where in we target the customers by dividing into different classes such as upper, middle and lower classes which is mainly figured by the earning of the family. Still the idea is not to harm the feelings and sentiments of the people like it was a scenario earlier in history where most the decisions were made on the basis of the class. Both of the authors tried to give exclusive examples in order to help us understand the seriousness of the issue. In the end both of them have been successful in making the concept clear to the readers though some might think the whole idea of talking about the distinction of classes is not respectable in today’s society because the way the scenario has changed now. Works Cited:  Fussell, Paul. "An Anatomy of the Classes." Vanguardnewsnetwork.com, 2004. Web. 24 Feb 2014. . Veblen, Thorstein. "Modern History Sourcebook: Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous Consumption, 1902." Fordham.edu, 1902. Web. 24 Feb 2014. .  Hardin, Garrett. "The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garrett Hardin (1968)." Dieoff.org, 1968. Web. 24 Feb 2014. . Hooks, Bell. Where we stand. New York: Routledge, 2000. Print. Read More