I changed the tone of the letter from being too assertive and maybe, aggressive to a more nuanced view of the topic at hand. The first draft was about taking a strong position on the issue of using guns in the national…
Download file to see previous pages...
I made these changes because I felt that a letter to an Editor would have to have the necessary shift in perspective from being on the offensive to taking a softer line. This was done out of propriety as well as a desire not to join issue with the other readers. I wanted to get my point across and argue about the editorial without taking on other readers on what may seem to be a futile attempt to join issue with them. The intention here was to comment on the issue at hand and not get carried away in making my case strongly.
I did quote on more than one occasion from the editorial. The quotation that I chose was to reflect the gravity of the issue at hand and make some suggestions regarding the same. The idea here was to show the author of the editorial the points where I agreed with her and the points where I felt she should have taken a more assertive stand. Hence, I selectively quoted from the article to reflect these positions of mine.
I want to make the point that guns do not have a place in a civilized society and particularly in national parks. Hence, my target audience would be the kind of people who would join the Mothers against drunk driving and similar projects. I was trying to convey my sense of anguish about using guns in public places and particularly in the national parks and hence wanted to convey my desire to make my stand clear. If my letter has to be evaluated fairly, my stand against taking guns to public places must be made clear and that I have strong opinions regarding the same.
To the best of my ability, I have made everything clear. I have stated the reasons for writing the letter as well as the position that I took. In this way, I have conveyed the reasons why I wrote that letter as well as what changed from the initial draft and what remained the same. Hence, I hope to be evaluated according to the merits of the letter and
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Writer's Memo for the final draft (letter) Assignment”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1558923-writers-memo-for-the-final-draft-letter
(Writer'S Memo for the Final Draft (letter) Assignment)
“Writer'S Memo for the Final Draft (letter) Assignment”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1558923-writers-memo-for-the-final-draft-letter.
The company’s main product is high quality beer and the company vision is ‘To seek long-term lucrative expansion by having the best value products to the beer drinker in the States.’ The Community Issue The community around the brewery in Massachusetts has to contend with the issue of pollution of their primary water sources.
Print sources cannot keep up with the rapid pace of Internet information and the capability of bloggers and citizen journalists to respond to news updates. Imagine having to wait until you received the morning paper to find out who one the 2008 Presidential Elections!
Mary Bazzi, the representative of Schultz, Ltd., informed us that the company’s response time would be considerably longer than that of Miller Computing, which will cost our organization approximately $873 in lost daily productivity. On three different occasions this
On the other hand, final draft is a rough draft that has be written again while ensuring that there are no spelling mistakes and grammatical typos. The follow steps may be helpful when writing a draft namely; brainstorming,
Miss Dalton, though with major failings on her retaliation procedure, was emotionally harassed continuously by Mr. Mullet. The amount of work that she has had placed on her tab is much too overwhelming for any human being. I feel that is only natural that she