Nobody downloaded yet

Peter singer and john arthur - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
This could be done if one did not have to give up a thing that is of comparable value to prevent the event from happening. Drawing the…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97% of users find it useful
Peter singer and john arthur
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Peter singer and john arthur"

Download file to see previous pages This may result in getting muddy and the clothes wet, but the fact that it has saved a life is justification enough.. Singer uses the argument that mass starvation and deaths due to hunger and suffering is preventable only if the affluent governments and the well off citizens donated more. Currently, rich governments and rich citizens are not under any moral obligation to help starving people and this is not ethically justified. Singer says that our morality needs to change along with our lifestyle and only then can we become more ethical people. People tend to look after their family and dear ones since they are bound by blood ties an they help someone nearby since the victims are within reach. According to Singer, one must be rid of this fallacy and be ready to help other, irrespective of the distances.
Singer (1972) believes that the affluent and people should contribute to help the poor and the starving. According to Singer, the rich and affluent do not respond to famine situations in countries such as Bangladesh where over nine million people were starving because of a failing government, cyclone and failing harvests. According to the author, people do not donate liberally to such causes nor do they take any extra efforts to increase the awareness in their government to take any action. As per the argument that Singer uses, countries continue to fritter away their money on useless expenses such as the Concorde project that would cost 440 million GBP. Even individuals do not care to donate any sizeable amount to help the starving for whom the donation is a difference between life and death. Singer points out that every day, hundreds of people die of starvation in the world and people and governments of affluent nations do not care to help the people and stop people from being killed. He relates this apathy to a type of murder and that people have come to take human life for granted. Singer ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Peter singer and john arthur Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words”, n.d.)
Peter singer and john arthur Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words. Retrieved from
(Peter Singer and John Arthur Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words)
Peter Singer and John Arthur Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words.
“Peter Singer and John Arthur Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Peter singer and john arthur

Famine, Affluence and Morality by Peter Singer

...on the equivalency of proximity when it references human emergency. In his view, it is the same if a child is drowning in a pond in front of our eyes, or if the child is dying of hunger or lack of health care on the other side of the world – the individual is morally obliged to help, even rush to assistance, even if it means personal risk or loss of property. Other authors such as John Arthur and Michael Slope use examples that extend the premises of Singer’s arguments to absurd ends, arguing that his position is invalid because it places unbearable and self-destructive burdens on an individual’s sense of moral obligation that can never be met practically. The critical tension between...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Peter Singer: Charity and Duty

... Peter Singer: Charity and Duty. Peter Singer’s essay, “Famine, Affluence and Morality,” was written in 1971, in the context of Bangladesh’s war for independence from Pakistan, and the ensuing refugee crisis, compounded by a devastating famine. The title of the essay is an unambiguous ‘signpost,’ and makes the subject of the piece, and its purpose, self-evident. It is a rousing call to awaken the conscience of the affluent, and make them accept famine relief as a moral duty. Singer makes a well-reasoned argument against “the present division between acts of duty and acts of charity” (9) which prevail in contemporary Western society. The essay attempts to change prevalent moral stances, is addressed to an inclusive audience... in contemporary...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Rich and Poor by Peter Singer

It is therefore there could not be any possibility of comparing the level of deprivations between the two culturally and economically pole-apart zones of the globe. The rich nations, according to the author, spend millions of dollars in feeding their pets, while they are unable to realize the bitter fact that by doing so, they are adding their share in respect of depriving the millions of humans of adequate food and proper nutrition. Although, the animals should not be deprived of the food, yet humans must be considered at first stance in order to make the world healthy, productive and beneficial one for the collective benevolence and progress of humanity at large. The affluent do not acknowledge the sufferings of the extremely po...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The Peter Singer Solution to World Poverty

...? The Singer Solution to World Poverty October 11, The Singer Solution to World Poverty In his article in the New York Times, Peter Singer, speaks of selfless philanthropy driven by self-guilt at excess spending as the panacea to solve the poverty problems of the world (Singer, 1999). Singer is a moral philosopher who has served as the chair at Monash University and Princeton University and has lectured at the Oxford University on ethics and moral philosophy. He has published many texts on moral dilemma and ethics. In his article in the New York Times, he questions the charitable burden and false sense of ethics that normally respectable claim that they have. He argues that such respectable people in fact have hidden craven urges... of the...
3 Pages(750 words)Article

Singer moral principle. Peter Singer and greatest happiness principle

...Peter Singer moral principle Peter Singer's article 'Famine, Affluence and Morality' is an interesting read even though it is difficult to agree totally with his point of view. His view "If we can prevent something bad without sacrificing anything of comparable significance, we ought to do it." does not sound very practical. In this article he has emphasized on two issues. One issue is an analogy provided by him. In this analogy he mentions that if a child is drowning in a pond then we should save him if there is no fear of risking our lives in that act. If we really face such a situation then it would without doubt be a moral obligation to save the child. He says that there would only be fear of dirtying one's clothes... , which is...
7 Pages(1750 words)Book Report/Review

Peter singer

...of the of the of the Peter Singer as an active humanitarian Peter Singer’s works have been enlightening. He can truly be termed as an active humanitarian because the affects of his works have bought to light issues that were otherwise not being paid much attention to. Peter Albert David Singer is a great humanist and a renowned animal rights’ activist as well. It is undoubtedly true that Peter Singer is among the hundred most influential people in the world. The Australian Philosopher, currently a professor of philosophy at the university of Princeton and The University of Melbourne (TakeOnIt, 2010),...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Peter Singer

...Peter Singer: On Euthanasia, Abortion, and Infanticide Life is one that is considered sacred. Human beings came to life so that they can serve their purpose. In life, not everything will turn out as expected. There are instances when something will eventually deviate and life, complicated as it is, may be disrupted. Peter Singer, the highly acclaimed philosopher and educator from Princeton University had been taking bullets for his much controversial stand regarding issues that are quite sensitive to the prickly society. He had authored several high- profile writings that had critics question his philosophy and morality. His moral and ethical perception may be off t from...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Peter Singer - Famine Affluence, And Morality

That first principle is that death and suffering as result of the shortage of shelter, food, and medical attention are bad. The other principle is that if it is in our power and ability to put to an end these bad things and suffering of the people from occurring, without sacrificing anything of equivalent moral significance, then we ought to honorably do it, as stated by. All these arguments put forward by Singer were to encourage most of the affluent countries to give more of their resources to the unfortunate that they are doing. This would help a great deal in dealing with some of the calamities such as famine and disaster. One of the counter-arguments presented by is the example of the drowning child, as it is only one person...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

All Animals are Equal by Peter Singer

... All Animals are Equal by Peter Singer Good looking philosophies and moral phrases may have several argumentative fallacies when one arrives at the question of considering all humans equal but keeping other species out of this sphere. Peter Singer has been able to expose many of such discrepancies in this brilliant piece of essay "All Animals Are Equal". Equality among all people regardless of race, gender or culture has been a highly discussed topic for the last couple of decades. Discrimination based on gender and color has been profoundly acknowledged in most countries and all efforts have been put to thrash it out universally....
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Peter Singer. Moral Reasoning

... Peter Singer: Moral Reasoning The analysis of Peter Singer is an interesting comparative analysis of reasoning from different schools of moral thinking. The main thesis of Singer is therefore a critical examination of the moral reasoning based majorly on the utilitarian and deontological theories or moral reasoning. In the determination of the moral standards of policies, values, and other practices, the whole precepts of moral reasoning are applied. Focusing thinking into wrongs and rights make thinking very logical and moral. According to the Utilitarianism theory, a critical reasoning tend to benefit majority in the sense that a moral act in its right form will tend to promote happiness to as many people as possible. However... , in a...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Peter singer and john arthur for FREE!

Contact Us