Deductive Reasoning Video - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
According to provided clip, shown (white) researcher provides two informants (subjects), a black (colored) child and a black (colored) woman, with two distinct propositions, read out aloud from flashcards:
Considering first informant’s (subject’s) conclusion to propositions…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.2% of users find it useful
Deductive Reasoning Video
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Deductive Reasoning Video"

Deductive Reasoning Video: A Response According to provided clip, shown (white) researcher provides two informants s), a black (colored) child and a black (colored) woman, with two distinct propositions, read out aloud from flashcards:
1. If you hit a glass with a hammer, the glass will break (hereafter referred to as “1”); and
2. If you hit a glass with a feather, the glass will break (hereafter referred to as “2”)
According to clip, black (colored) child is first shown provided with (white) researcher’s 1, followed by following statements respectively:
3. Dawn hit the glass with a hammer; and
4. So, what happened to the glass?
Child concludes to 1, 3 and 4 as follows:
5. It [glass] broke
This (5) is followed by (white) researcher’s:
6. It broke! Why did it break?
In turn, 6 evokes child’s:
7. Because the hammer is hard
Considering first informant’s (subject’s) conclusion to propositions 1, 3, and follow-up statement 4, his conclusion based on provided (1 & 3) propositions clearly demonstrates an example of both a valid and sound argument in which 5 necessarily follows from 1 and 3 in addition to 1 and 3 both being true propositions making 1,3, and 5 a sound argument. Child’s 7, evoked by researcher’s 6, comes, moreover, as an implicit proposition (i.e. [Since] Dawn hit the glass with a hammer [which is hard], it [glass] broke).
Conversely, child’s conclusion to researcher’s 2, 4, and proposition “Dawn hit the glass with a feather” (8), is:
9. Nothing
Clearly, 2, 4, and 9 are an example of an invalid, unsound argument in which 2 is a false proposition and 9 does not follow necessarily from 2 and 8. Similarly, evoked by researcher’s follow-up, “Nothing happened. Why did nothing happen?” (10), child’s “Because the feather is soft” (11), comes as an implicit proposition.
Black (colored) lady is then shown provided with (white) researcher’s 2 and 8 and followed up on by 4. Concluding, black (colored) lady’s response is:
12. It broke
This (12) is followed by researcher’s follow-up:
13. Why did it break?
Collectively, 2, 8, and 12 act as a valid but not a sound argument in which 12 necessarily follows from 2 and 8 but 2 is not a true (i.e. false) argument. Informant’s later part of response, “So, hitting a glass with a feather, [‘t] broke” acts as an implicit proposition. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Deductive Reasoning Video Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Deductive Reasoning Video Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from
(Deductive Reasoning Video Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Deductive Reasoning Video Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words.
“Deductive Reasoning Video Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Deductive Reasoning Video

Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning

...? Deductive Reasoning and Inductive Reasoning Your al affiliation More Shame by Cedar Rapids The Roman Catholic hierarchyin this country has promised accountability and justice for children sexually abused by priests. (2)We fear it has a long way to go. (3)A new inquiry has found that nearly a decade after the scandal engulfed the American church, children are still in peril (4) and some leaders are still stonewalling investigations. A grand-jury report released Feb. 10 accused three priests and a teacher in the Philadelphia Archdiocese of raping two young boys in the 1990s. It also accused a senior church official of knowingly endangering thousands of children by shielding accused...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Inductive and deductive reasoning

...? Inductive and deductive reasoning Unions are prominent organizations that help workers that come together to achieve certain goals that are common to all of them. In most cases, the unions deal with setting the integrity of the trade, fighting to get higher payments and also try to set up good working conditions for themselves. This paper is going to evaluate whether public workers should be allowed to join unions and engage in collective bargaining by use of inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive and deductive reasoning Introduction A union is an organized group of people who have come together in order to achieve some objectives...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

The Difference Between Inductive And Deductive Reasoning. How Are Issues Of Validity And Truth Distinguished

...? What is the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning? How do you distinguish between issues of validity and truth? Table of Contents Inductive and Deductive Reasoning 3 Distinction between validity and truth 4 References 7 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Inductive reasoning is a type of logic in which the general rule or propositions are derived from specific examples. The examples are individual or specific instances that are evaluated and the findings obtained from the specific examples are accumulated to form a general rule. The inductive reasoning is intuitive and majorly a result of guesswork. For this reason, inductive reasoning is said to be probabilistic (Hacking, 2001, p.38). The conclusions obtained... ...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Deductive Technology ( Project Plan)

...Deductive Technology Table of Contents Project Overview 2 Risks in implementing the project 6 Steps to mitigate risks 9 Project Plan 12 Financial Plan 14 Change Management 17 Project Overview Deductive technologies, one of the biggest providers of assistive technology help children having special educational requirements in UK. The company has been successful in earning the second leading position as one of the biggest ‘independent supplier’ in the industry of ICT devices. The company develops certain educational software equipments which enable children with special needs to upgrade their knowledge base. With the help of such sophisticated equipments, the company aims at helping the children adopt...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Using deductive and inductive logic

...On the Issue of Surrogate Decision Maker: Deductive and Inductive Reasoning Introduction The right to die continues to be an issue in the modern time. Those who have embraced it, the right to die remains to be a subject of debate in relation to the logic unique to the subject matter. The practice of aid in dying for a terminally-ill patient is challenged on what means are required to show that the patient chooses to die. Thus, the concept and function of a surrogate decision maker are systematically defined. The concept of surrogate decision maker is embedded in the principle of patient autonomy. This paper chooses the type of a surrogate decision maker as the projection of informed consent -- the competent patient makes a “living... will.”...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Constructing Deductive Arguments

...Deductive Reasoning Argument Your al affiliation Hypothetical situation Deliberate killing of human is acrime and murders should be punished. Abortion is deliberate killing of the unborn human fetus. My neighbors Rosa and Michal aborted their child like many other people in this country. Therefore, they are murderers and should be punished. Fetus is human because it has complete set of DNA and deliberately removing it equates that a human is killed who would have developed into a complete form if the killers were stopped. No doubt, killing is unlawful and those who abort their child should be punished according to law. Evaluation (1)Deliberate killing of human is a crime and (2) murders should be...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments

...Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments Introduction There are two forms of argument ly deductive and inductive, which we study to help in differentiate between correct and incorrect reasoning, A deductive argument is one in which it is supposed that the premises (supporting reasons or evidence) offer an assurance of the reality of the conclusion. The premises herein are envisioned to offer a very strong support for the conclusion in such a way that if the premises are true, the conclusion can under no circumstances be false (IEP, 2003). The conclusion follows with absolute certainty. For example, All human beings are mortal. I am a human being. I am mortal. An inductive argument on the other hand is an argument... , then the argument...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Investigative Plan track a suspect. A video surveillance will be used to help check on constitutional rights. The pattern of robbery can be analyzed using the criminal profiling method. Profiling enables suspect prioritizing in a case. This will also help in evolving new investigative methods in investigating serial crimes (Bennell, Corey, Taylor, and Ecker, 2008). Personality traits, behavioral patterns and psychopathologies, are applied in criminal profiling. Demographic variables like age, location and race, are also used in the profiling. It involves deductive and inductive reasoning of concepts. Inductive deals with similarity of the crime background while the deductive basis on...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Deductive and Inductive Arguments

... Deductive and Inductive Arguments A deductive argument is an argument in which the premises are correct, and thus the conclusion from that argument is bound to be correct ( A deductive argument is said to be sound if the premises are true that is they are morally and logically correct. For instance, an argument with the following premise; Moses is 87 years old, Moses has lived more than eight centuries, and the conclusion for the argument is that Moses is an aged person. This argument is sound given the fact that all of its premises are logically correct hence it means since the premises are correct the conclusion from the argument is bound to be correct. A deductive argument is said to be unsound if its premises... determines...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Critical Thinking - Inductives & deductive reasoning

... present some evidence to support the truthfulness of the conclusion. Furthermore, nobody can determine its validity or invalidity. Only a comparison can be used to challenge the argument. The conclusion needs not to be certain. Deductive reasoning According to Teitelbaum & Wilensky (2013), this is a process of reasoning based on one or more statements in order to arrive to a logically certain conclusion. These types of reasoning need to connect premises with conclusion. Deductive reasoning relies on clear and true rules of logic to reach a necessarily true conclusion. For example There must be something incorrect with the engine of my truck, because it will not start. In this case, we are arguing that the engine of the truck... is not...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Deductive Reasoning Video for FREE!

Contact Us