Architectural Design: An Analysis of Retail Lighting - Essay Example

When comparing to other stores, Walgreens lighting was only moderately better (X=3.53, sd=.68). The t-test for all the foregoing items suggests that there are significant differences in the following: store lighting (t=3.43, p=.001); shelf lighting (t=2.16, p=.035); and influence of lighting in choice of store (t=3.49, p=.001). In all items, it has been shown that Walgreens yielded higher means or ratings compared to Rite Aid stores. For Chemist stores, the means for store lighting is very high (X=4.57, sd=.50).

Shelf lighting is rated as high (X=4.30, sd =.47), along with and ease of finding items in the store (X=3.80, sd=.41). On the influence of in-store lighting, the mean suggests it has moderate influence (X=2.77, sd=1.07). Upon comparison with other stores, Chemist stores lighting was judged as better (X=3.73, sd=.74). On the other hand, Super Drug stores results show that the mean for store lighting is moderate (X=3.03, sd=.56). Shelf lighting also yielded a moderate rating (X=2.90, sd=.61), along with ease of finding items in the store (X=3.07, sd=.69).

On the influence of in-store lighting, the average suggests it has moderate influence (X=2.63, sd=1.27). When comparing to other stores, Super Drug stores lighting was only moderately better (X=3.17, sd=.79). The t-test for all the foregoing items suggest that there are significant differences in the following: store lighting (t=11.19, p=.000); shelf lighting (t=10.02, p=.000); ease of finding items in the store (t=5.00, p=.000); and comparison of lighting to other stores (t=2.86, p=.006). Across all these items, it has been shown that Chemist stores yielded higher means or ratings compared to Super Drug stores.

The means for US stores show that store lighting has been rated as high (X=3.62, sd=.61). Shelf lighting was assessed as high (X=3.60, sd=.62), while ease of finding items in the store was also rated as high (X=3.72,