StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Newtown Telecomms Plc - Initial Shares - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Newtown Telecomms Plc - Initial Shares" states that if there is fraudulent behaviour, the court will usually lift the veil but most of the big cases fall short of fraud and are cases of deliberately avoiding liability through the use of the corporate form. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.8% of users find it useful
Newtown Telecomms Plc - Initial Shares
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Newtown Telecomms Plc - Initial Shares"

Newtown Telecomms Plc: A Case Study 0 Introduction: Although a convenient form of business organization, the formation and administration of companies have lot of legal formalities to be complied with by the persons responsible for the running of the company. Elaborate provisions have been made with regard to the registration, issue of shares, and all other day to day administration is concerned. It is mandatory to comply with the requirements of the Company Law provisions, failure of which will attract the penal provisions laid out by the Act. In the instant case this paper studies the problems of Newtown Telecomms Plc, a public company limited by shares on the potential legal consequences of an anticipated complaint against its subsidiary company Mobilestoyou Limited, for loss of health and property by one of the customers of the subsidiary, under the provisions of Company Law. 2.0 Issue of Initial Shares: The Company was formed with 30,000 fully paid ordinary shares of ₤ 1 each subscribed by Peter, Paul and Mary While Peter and Mary pays the value of the shares by cash, Paul pays the cost of his shares by transferring the ownership of his 10 year old car to the company. The legal position with reference to the issue of initial shares is as under: Even though no maximum amount is prescribed for a public company limited by shares, a public limited company should have an authorized capital of at lease ₤ 50,000.1 ________________________________________________________________________ 1 Companies House Guidance Booklet December 2006 Chapter 2 Public Limited Companies PP 15 http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/about/pdf/gbf1.pdf The Act does not specify any minimum capital for the private companies. In the case of Newtown the company was formed with the authorized capital of ₤30,000 which is in violation of the provisions of the company law. The company should increase the authorized capital by passing an ordinary resolution (unless the articles of association require a special or extraordinary resolution). A copy of the resolution - and notice of the increase on Form 123 - must reach Registrar of Companies within 15 days of being passed. The Company Law has not laid any restrictions on the allotment of shares for consideration other than cash. Generally shares may be allotted for payment: wholly for cash; partly for cash and partly for a non-cash payment; or wholly for a non-cash payment. Hence the allotment of shares to Paul against the value of his cars does not pose a problem. However the company should file a form 88(2) showing the extent to which the shares are to be treated as paid-up. The form should also specify a brief description of the non-cash payment for which the shares were allotted 3.0 Legal Position with Regard to the Complaint from the Customer on Loss to Property and Health: As corporate affairs became more complex and group structures emerged (where a parent company organises its business through a number of subsidiary companies in which it is usually the sole shareholder) the companies acts began to recognise that treating each company in a group as separate was misleading. Over time a number of provisions were introduced to recognise this fact. The case of Jade in claiming loss of health and property is on similar lines of Adams v Cape Industries Plc (1990) Ch. 433 which is connected with the phenomenon of ‘lifting of corporate veil’. Facts of the case: Until 1979, Cape, an English company, mined and marketed asbestos. Its worldwide marketing subsidiary was another English company, named Capasco. It also had a US marketing subsidiary incorporated in Illinois, named NAAC. In 1974, some 462 people sued Cape, Capasco, NAAC and others in Texas, for personal injuries arising from the installation of asbestos in a factory. Cape although protested the case on the ground that the Texas court has no jurisdiction, ended up in settling the case. Subsequently Cape formed other subsidiaries, this time with the intention to reorganize the business in US for taxation and other liability issues. Further claims from 206 cases were decided against Cape and Capasco which were not settled by them. Here also Cape used the defence of jurisdiction. In 1979 Cape sold its asbestos mining and marketing business and therefore had no assets in the US. Adams sought the enforcement of the US default judgment in England. The key issue was whether Cape was present within the US jurisdiction through its subsidiaries or had somehow submitted to such jurisdiction. The only way that could be the case was if it lifted the veil of incorporation either treating the Cape group as one single entity, or finding the subsidiaries were a mere façade or that the subsidiaries were agents for Cape. Based on the facts of the case of Adams v Cape Industries Plc, Jade can proceed against NewtownTelcomm Plc in the following grounds with a plea to lift the corporate veil: By treating Newtowm Telecomm plc and Mobliestoyou Limited as one single economic entity By claiming that the forming of the subsidiary Mobilestoyou Ltd was a mere façade or By claiming that the subsidiary was the agent for Newtown Telecomms plc. However Jade cannot be advised with certainty that her claim for compensation will succeed because of the decisions of the courts in the case of Adams v Cape Industries Plc and various other cases. In order to decide on the ‘single economic unit’ the court has to be satisfied about the lack of clarity about a statute or document establishing the connection between the entities involved. In this case Salomon v A. Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC22 the court concluded that “upon incorporation, a new and separate artificial entity comes into existence. At law, a corporation is a distinct person with its own personality separate from and separate artificial entity comes into existence. At law, a corporation is a distinct person with its own personality separate from and independent of the persons who formed it, who invest money in it, and who direct and manage its operations. It follows that the rights and duties of a corporation are not the rights and duties of its directors or members who are, most of the time, obscured by a corporate veil surrounding the company.2 ________________________________________________________________________ 2 Gonzalo Villalta Puig (2000) E Law – Murdoch University Electrical Journal of Law Vol 7 No 3 http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v7n3/puig73a.txt While considering the issue of ‘mere façade concealing the true facts’ the Court of Appeal recognised it as being a well established exception to the Salomon principle. In the case of Jones v Lipman (1962), Mr Lipman’s created the company solely with the aim of getting away from the effect of an intended transaction. In determining whether the company is a mere façade the motives of those behind the alleged façade may be relevant3. Applying this principle, the Court of Appeal looked at the motives of Cape in structuring its US business through its various subsidiaries. It found that although Cape’s motive was to try to minimise its presence in the US for tax and other liabilities there was nothing legally wrong with the motive of Cape. Similarly on the consideration of the ‘agency’ argument, which was a straight forward application of agency principle, the court examined whether the subsidiary was Cape’s agent and was acting within its actual or apparent authority. In that case the actions of the subsidiary would bind the parent. The court found that the subsidiaries were independent businesses free from the day to day control of Cape with no general power to bind the parent. Therefore Cape could not be present in the US through its subsidiary agent. Apart from the judgments in some stray cases like Creasey v Breachwood Motors Ltd (1992) BCC 638 the decision in Cape has dominated the case law since. With the reading of the above principles laid down by the courts: ________________________________________________________________________ 3 Dr. A. Dignnam (2005) Lecture 2: Lifting the Veil, Company Law University of London External Programmae available at http://www.londonexternal.ac.uk/current_students/programme_resources/laws/law_docs/autumn_finals_2006.pdf Newtown Telcomm plc and Mobilestoyou Limited cannot be treated as one single economic and unit and proceeded with for the claim from Jade for the loss of property and health. Also it cannot be proved that the forming of the subsidiary Mobilestoyou Limited was a mere façade although the company Mobilestoyou Limited was formed with an intention to avoid the liabilities that may arise from the potential claims on loss of health by using the mobile phone equipments. The action of Newtown Telecomms plc in promoting the subsidiary as a separate entity for the manufacture and marketing of the mobile phone equipments cannot be questioned under law as being done with a malicious intention. Similarly the agency theory cannot also hold good in the case of these two companies. The mere fact that the letters written to Mobilstoyou Limited are being replied by the parent company does not make any difference in the legal position of both being separate entities. 4.0 Conclusion: Occasionally if there is fraudulent behaviour, the court will usually lift the veil but most of the big cases fall short of fraud and are cases of deliberately avoiding liability through the use of the corporate form. There is usually moral culpability on the part of those behind the company but nothing illegal. At various points the courts have been more inclined to lift the veil than others. Currently the Adams case holds sway and thus the veil of incorporation is a rigid construct. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“A case of Company Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
A case of Company Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1539623-a-case-of-company-law
(A Case of Company Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
A Case of Company Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1539623-a-case-of-company-law.
“A Case of Company Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1539623-a-case-of-company-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Newtown Telecomms Plc - Initial Shares

Comment on Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd

From the paper "Comment on Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd " it is clear that the Government-owned shares in Belize, but were gradually sealed off when in 1989, Belize privatized its telecom network and established Belize Telecommunications Limited, which is a corporation.... Under the privatization, the government was to gradually seal off its shares and, in the process, retained a special share (Redfem, 2004).... The government also owned Class 'C' shares....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Sex, Death, and the Drama of Aids by George Newtown

newtown alleged that the erosion of the previous view that AIDS were only contracted between homosexuals transformed the world view on this disease and magnified the stigma attached to homosexuals in directly contributing to a sexual revolution that invited death within its midst.... The article written by George newtown entitled “Sex, Death, and the Drama of Aids” and published in the Antioch Review, Inc.... Likewise, newtown also emphasized that the element of sex was an important factor in the dilemma, seen to have been classified as paramount and indispensable....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Business Environment of Tesco Plc

The paper "The Business Environment of Tesco plc" highlights that the primary responsibility of Tesco to its stockholders is to make sure that its stock provides the largest incentive to them to invest their funds.... Tesco plc clearly identifies its mission by the statement "Our core purpose is to create value for customers to earn their lifetime loyalty" (Tesco plc 2008) This statement is in recognition that the success of the giant retailer is highly dependent on two key identified stakeholders-"the people who shop with us and the people who work with us" (Tesco plc 2008)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Critical Appraisal of the Practice and Theory of Strategy Development Processes in British Telecom

The initial reorganization of British telecom as an integrated telecommunications corporation was made in the early 1990s.... The paper "Critical Appraisal of the Practice and Theory of Strategy Development Processes in British Telecom" states that SWOT deals with the chief issues related to the business environment and the strategic capability of an organization that is expected to affect strategy development....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Life Telecom Corporate Performance

Life Telecom, unlike a typical Internet Service Provider, provides its users with a unique forum for communications and entertainment through: wireless internet, national and international telephony traffic and VAS end to end.... Life Telecom is a real alternative.... ... ... ... This provider in Bahrain proving its technological superiority with fully converged IPs architecture and the use of selective wireless technologies, therefore enabling substantial reduction of network investment, ergo becoming an extremely cost effective option for the users....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The UK Mobile Phone Industry

The paper "The UK Mobile Phone Industry" tells that the UK mobile phone industry has several players foremost of which are Vodafone and O2, both are the primary leaders in mobile telecommunication in the UK and both their market shares are pegged at 24% each.... ... ... ... And in the last eight years, it is well known that the mobile phone industry has boomed further, enjoying average year-on-year subscriber growth of 24%....
58 Pages (14500 words) Thesis

Strategic Management of France Telecoms

The research focuses on the company's change from a nation-based to a global-based telecoms industry in order to have an edge or be at par with the revenue-generating.... The research includes a study on the company's hurdle of the changes by implementing the proper changes.... ... ... ... Another internal factor is the company's strive to increase its customer service activities....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Rules and Regulations of a Talktalk Telecom Group

The following report is regarding the rules and regulations required to be followed by TalkTalk Telecom Group plc in order to prepare its annual report.... Each country has certain accounting and auditing requirements that are to be followed by the companies operating in that.... ...
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us