Nobody downloaded yet

Criminal Law Problem question - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Neither Edward nor Sarah is criminally liable for the death of Lisa whichever it is founder either on unlawful act ("unlawful act manslaughter") or on gross negligence. Section 23 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 or the Act provides: "Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously administer to or cause to be administered to or taken by any other person any poison or other destructive or noxious thing, so as thereby to endanger the life of such person, or so as thereby to inflict upon such person any grievous bodily harm, shall be guilty of [an offence] and being convicted thereof shall be liable…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Criminal Law Problem question
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Criminal Law Problem question"

Download file to see previous pages The relevant facts in the Kennedy case are substantially similar to the facts in the given problem. In Kennedy, as in the case of Edward, the defendant merely prepared a dose of heroin for the deceased. It was the deceased who self-administered the drug as in Lisa's case. In the Kennedy case, the court ruled that defendant Kennedy cannot be held criminally liable for manslaughter. Applying the Kennedy ruling, then Edward cannot likewise be held criminally liable for Lisa's death because Edward was not the one who injected the deceased with the drug. Under the same principle, Sarah cannot likewise be held criminally liable for Lisa's death as she was not the one who injected Lisa with the drug. Notably, Edward (unlike in Kennedy) was not also the one who gave the syringe to the deceased. If Kennedy (who was the one who gave the syringe to the deceased) is not criminally liable, then a fortiori Edward should not also be held criminally liable for Lisa's death since he was not even the one who gave the syringe to the deceased. In ruling for the defendant, the Kennedy court had occasion to discuss the elements of the crime of unlawful act manslaughter: (1) that the defendant committed an unlawful act; (2) that such unlawful act was a crime and (3) that the defendant's unlawful act was a significant cause of the death of the deceased. In the given problem, Edward admittedly committed an unlawful (and criminal) act by supplying the heroin to the deceased. The mere act of supplying heroin, however, could not have possibly caused Lisa's death since "the supply of drugs would itself have caused no harm unless the deceased had subsequently used the drugs in a form and quantity which was dangerous."2 Clearly, any unlawful act manslaughter charge cannot be based on the mere act of supplying the heroin.
According to the Kennedy court, the heroin (as in the given problem) is described as "freely and voluntaril ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Criminal Law Problem question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Criminal Law Problem question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Retrieved from
(Criminal Law Problem Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Criminal Law Problem Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words.
“Criminal Law Problem Question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Criminal Law Problem question

Employment Law Problem Question

...?Employment Law Problem Question Advice to Arinder A detailed examination of the restrictive covenants in Arinder’s employment contract will be made. Restrictive covenants that are triggered after the termination of an employment contract are considered a restraint of trade per se and anti – competitive. Such covenants are void, as they violate public policy. If the employee challenges the validity of such a covenant, it is the responsibility of the employer to prove that the covenant is justifiable.1 PPP will have to defend the use of their restrictive covenant should Arinder contest it. Agreements that prohibit employees from working for a competitor, after the termination of employment are fundamentally void. These covenants... the...
13 Pages(3250 words)Coursework

Analysis of Literary Criticism about Oranges of Gary Soto

4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Criminal Law. Problem Question. R v Danny Johnson

...? Criminal Law Problem Question R v Danny Johnson No: Criminal Law Problem Question R vDanny Johnson Homicide is an act of killing one person by another person which includes murder, manslaughter, target killings and extra judicial killings. The killing in every part of the world and in the eyes of law is unlawful. However, murder in self defense is justifiable and according to law. The killing of a living human being falls under the purview of murder. The Person Act 1861 and the Infant Life Preservation Act 1929 and the Abortion Act 1967 provide protection to a person...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Contract law problem question

...that there was an offer and an acceptance. The question remains whether there was consideration. The general rule is that there has to be reciprocity between the two contracting parties i.e. that a promise should not be able to get anything unless he gives or promises to give something in return to the promisor [Curie v. Misa (1875)]. In our situation, in the agreement between SE and Jayne, SE promised to give 4,000 and in return Jayne attended the training conference. There is however, the issue of the consideration being adequate and whether performance of contractual duties could form sufficient consideration. In the case of the adequacy of the consideration, the law is quite settled here owing to...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Criminal Law: problem analysis

...Criminal Law Order 161674 Deadline: 2007-04-03 16:01 Style: APA Language Style: English UK Grade: 2 Pages: 8 Answer: This problem question raises some issues from homicide, inchoate offences. In order to answer this question it is necessary to discuss transferred malice, conspiracy, and mens rea of Ben, Carl and Drew. The criminal liability of Ben, Carl and Drew is discussed bellow. Gabrielle and her personal trainer, Carl may be liable for conspiracy. At common law the offence of conspiracy was committed where two of more persons agreed 'to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means'...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Criminal law problem question

...CRIMINAL LAW PROBLEM QUESTION - ACTUS REUS Actus reus, put simply, means 'a guilty act'. This must be present for an offence to have been committed. In the case of murder actus reus must be an act that results in death. In the case of manslaughter, this can be performed in a commission or an omission resulting in death. The most common definition of the actus reus in murder is provided by Edward Coke, who states - "When a man of sound memory and of the age of discretion, unlawfully killeth within any country of the realm any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the King's Peace, . . . so as the party wounded, or hurt, et cetera, die of the wound or hurt, et cetera,...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

English Criminal law Problem question - Discuss the criminal liability, if any, of Bruiser for the murder of Dot

...Criminal liability of Bruiser According to English law, the definition of murder is given as the killing of another person whether by act or omission having either the intention to kill (with "malice aforethought") or to cause grievous bodily harm1. In order to establish a cause of action for willful murder, there are two factors that must be established (a) the causing of the death of another human being and (b) the intent to cause grievous bodily harm, which is referred to as ‘malice afterthought’ and (c) the physical act of injury must match with a mens rea or the requirement of the ‘guilty mind’. In the event the actus rea and the mens rea are concurrent, then the accused person will be deemed fully...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Criminal Law - Homicide:Murder Problem hospital of severe head injuries. a) In order to be found guilty of a crime, the prosecution must provr actus reus and mens rea. Briefly explain these two terms. {20 Marks} b) Discuss the criminal liability of Gordon for the offence he has committed against Thomas. {20 Marks} c) Consider whether the current law on Murder is satisfactory and discuss the possible reforms to murder which have been suggested. {40 Marks} The term actus reus refers to the act of the accused which when combined with either intention on the part of the accused or recklessness causes a crime to be committed. The actus reus for an offence will alter depending on the crime committed. On a charge of murder or manslaughter...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Criminal law problem question

...Criminal law Problems Is Archie liable to any criminal charges for his conduct? Issue In the case, Archie aims at a bird withhis catapult. However, the stone Archie catapulted misses the bird and accidentally land onto the windscreen of a passing bus which as a result veers off the road and clash into a garage. Subsequently, the crash triggers a chain of events that leads to a fire that destroys the garage. Therefore, Archie can be charged with criminal damage for his role in causing the fire. Law Charlie contribution to the destruction of property in this case can be classified under the simple criminal damage offense...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Contract Law Problem Question

...contractual relationship2. Generally the contract law is defined as an agreement that creates obligation enforceable by law. This obligation is based upon the mutual acceptance, consideration, legality and capacity to perform. In this process of conformity, fulfilment and binding, there may arise number of problems if in case contract is not implemented properly or if one party rejects to perform according to the obligations. Thousands of contracts are agreed upon and signed in the world every day and most of them are not performed in their full essence according to the terms3. Whilst many of them are resolved by negotiations and discussions but there comes cases under which hostilities...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Criminal Law Problem question for FREE!

Contact Us