DISCUSSION AND REPLY TO A DISCUSSION( 4th year Nursing course) - Essay Example

Discussion and Reply to a Discussion (4th year Nursing Discussion of the Article In the contemporary health care context, focusing on the family has been recognized as an essential component of nursing practice. Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR), or the practice of permitting family members to be with the patient during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, represents a paradigm shift among health care providers and it has become a controversial issue. In their article "Family presence during resuscitation: Canadian critical care nurses' perspectives", McClement, Fallis, and Pereira deal with this issue from the perspective of Canadian critical care nurses and they try to make out the various practices and preferences of Canadian critical care nurses regarding FPDR.

The article also attempts to determine the extent to which formal FPDR policies exist in hospitals, and the level of awareness among the nurses there. Thus, the article has a great utility to the practicing nurses as it explicates salient issues about the practice of FPDR identified by nurses who responded to the qualitative portion of the survey. The conclusions of the study have great implications for the practice of nurses who experience family presence during resuscitation. "The practice of FPDR impacts both family members and members of the resuscitation team.

Nurses weigh these impacts when considering whether or not to bring family members to the bedside." (McClement, Fallis, and Pereira, 2009). According to the findings of the study, the majority of critical care nurses support FPDR which suggests that the formal policies in hospitals to facilitate this process. Therefore, the article provides illumining insights into the nurse's perspective in regards to the presence of family members during resuscitation and it also deals with benefits and risks of FPDR for family members and health care professionals.

In short, the article by McClement, Fallis, and Pereira has a great relevance in the context of the contemporary practice of nurses which recognizes focusing on the family as an indispensable component.Reply to the DiscussionThe discussion to the article undertaken in the paper covers the most important points of the article by McClement, Fallis, and Pereira and it offers a personal response to the particular article from the point of view of a practicing nurse. All through the discussion of the article, the reviewer has provided a personal interpretation incorporating the major arguments of the article and connecting them to the personal use of the reviewer.

Thus, the author of this discussion tells what she gained from the article, including knowledge about the nurse's perspective in regards to the presence of family members during resuscitation and the benefits and risks for family members and health care professionals. It becomes lucid that the student has comprehended the most important arguments of the article and she maintains that the pros and cons shared by the nurses in this article are reasonable. Based on her detailed understanding of the topic, she also provides instances from the article which are connected to her nursing practice.

In the discussion, for example, the student agrees with the nurses' explanation that when family members get to see how hard health care professionals have worked to save their loved one, they won't have any unanswered questions or doubts about what else could have been done and they will appreciate the effort regardless of the result. Therefore, the discussion has been a very careful and effective one which looks into the various arguments of the article from the point of view of a practicing nurse.

Reference McClement, S., Fallis, W., & Pereira, A. (2009). "Family presence during resuscitation: Canadian critical care nurses' perspectives." Journal of Nursing Scholarship (41) 3, 233 - 240. Retrieved 02 September, 2009. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122580459/abstractCRETRY=1&SRETRY=0