Love is a Fallacy Critical Analysis - Essay Example

The narrator’s vocabulary itself shows that he is an intellectual snob. He is ready to criticize everybody: Bellows has “nothing upstairs”, while Polly Espy has “to be taught to think.” Although the narrator is so conceited, the reader does not criticize him, but is more likely to see him as a comical figure and even to have a little sympathy for him.

Polly Espy is a very amusing character. In the narrator’s eyes, she is the caricature of the ‘dumb blonde. Here again, Shulman gives an exaggerated picture of her supposed lack of intelligence, with her one-word responses to everything, such as “Wow-dow”, “Magnif,” and “Terrif”.

The author uses the such exaggerated characterization of both the narrator and Polly very cleverly to add to the humor of the story. This is a very skillful technique used by Shulman to make his characters show exaggerated characteristics to increase the comic appeal of the story.  The part where the narrator teaches Polly logic is so funny that the reader laughs out loud.

Although “Love is a Fallacy” is written as a humorous piece, there is a lot of deep meaning underneath the surface. In the case of the narrator, underneath all the conceit, there is a character who is pathetically lonely. When Bellows asks him, “Where have you been?” the narrator replies, “In the library” which is the place where he spends all his time on campus. He is a nerd who has no social life or friends. He is not a part of the popular set on campus. While the reader laughs at his extreme conceit, at the same time, the reader also feels a little sorry for him.

In the same way, the author’s tone suggests that Polly Espy wickedly plays up to the narrator with her dumb responses and reactions to his teaching of logic – batting her eyelashes at the narrator, gasping in wonder at his cleverness, and sobbing in sentiment. The reader realizes that Polly is having a lot of fun going along with the narrator’s game. She admits, “This is more fun than dancing even.” The reader’s suspicion that Polly is leading the narrator on proves true when she finally uses the narrator’s course on logical fallacies to turn the tables on him. This is proof that Polly is a very smart girl and not the dumb-witted girl in the narrator’s picture.