Working in a Law Firm - Report Example

Download file to see previous pages In the “Reluctant fundamentalist” movie, Changez Khan is mistreated by the American authorities and suspected of terror in his place of origin. At least this is how Khan feels and, in fact, feels that every American was against him. This was a sufficient reason for him to hate Americans too. The CIA on the other side suspects Khan of an association with terrorism because he celebrates when he learns of the Bombing of the American Towers. This movie is likely to propagate the notion that terrorism is justified by a particular group of people. It fasts distrust rust between global communities.

News item reflective analysis
The six news items analyzed include news twisters reported based on the outcome of various cases touching security.
R v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 584 (14 February 2006) is a case in which Lodhi (a Muslim convert, an architect, and Australian) was sentenced to 20 years. An AAP reporter’s news report read “A Muslim convert accused of plotting to blow up Israel’s embassy in Canberra became the first Australian convicted under new terror laws Friday after suddenly pleading guilty during his trial” (Blogs.news.com.au, 2015) This person who was an architect and an Australian could just be referred to by the titles. I strongly feel this particular report must have been meant to send a point to the public that Muslims could be a security threat.

An audio news item on ABC news on R v Ul-Haque (Unreported, NSW Supreme Court, Bell J, 8 February 2006) in which the ASIO lost/dropped the case is non-partisan (ABC News, 2015). By putting on air the remarks, the defense lawyer (which in my opinion exposes the security authorities as very corrupt) informs the public that the notion created about terrorism is not, particularly what it is and that some of the counter-terrorism acts are a big scum. Alright, if anything is to go by then I understand that justice can better be found in a court of law which does not favor anybody.

A BBC news report (News.bbc.co.uk, 2015) on Benbrook’s case conclusion (R v Benbrika & Ors [2009] VSC 21 (3 February 2009)) remains plainer but with little impressionistic words that assert some Muslim association with terror, according to my opinion. For example, referring to Benbrook as a Muslim cleric in their headline and putting in quotes the “violent Jihadist” creates a link between Muslims and terror. ...Download file to see next pages Read More