Nobody downloaded yet

Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previously - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
This paper "Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previously?" focuses on the debate that has been going on since the time when the monarchy and the government, in general, were placed under the control of parliament and true democracy started to be practised in Britain. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.9% of users find it useful
Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previously
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previously"

Download file to see previous pages For those who believe in parliamentary sovereignty, parliament has absolute power which is unlimited by any other arm of government and because of this supremacy, all the legislation passed by it cannot be challenged by any other authority. In fact, it has at times been stated that parliament is not limited in what laws it can pass and that all of those that are passed are binding to all the people within its jurisdiction. While in other countries which have the parliamentary system, the actions of parliament are restricted by written constitutions that govern how these parliaments can act, in Britain; this is not the case because there is no written constitution to provide the guidelines. Many have used this to justify the belief that parliament remains as supreme as it was a century ago and this is mainly because it is the one which can make its own guidelines towards its conduct.
There has been some debate concerning whether parliament is independent of the other organs of state or whether it is supreme to them. Some writers have stated that parliamentary sovereignty is equivalent to the sovereignty of the state and that the two are the same thing (Newman 175). This idea has been hotly contested because of the opposing belief that parliament is just one of the organs of state and that although it has sovereignty in its own right; it is not supreme to the other organs. In fact, it is stated that the role of parliament is strictly restricted to the role of passing legislation and that it does not have the right to interfere in the functions of the other arms or organs of government. When considering the legislative powers attributed to the British parliament, it is difficult to define the extent to which these powers go and whether they can be limited or not. What can be best described is the fact that the lower house, or the House of Commons, has supremacy in almost all legislative activity in parliament. However, this does not mean that all legislation is passed solely by this house because most of the legislation tends to be passed through cooperation between both houses of parliament (Packman 1229).   ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previous Essay”, n.d.)
Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previous Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1792219-the-topic-law-and-the-state
(Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previous Essay)
Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previous Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1792219-the-topic-law-and-the-state.
“Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previous Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1792219-the-topic-law-and-the-state.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Public Law - Parliamentary Sovereignty
...in reaching his determination exploiting ambiguity in existing legislation applicable to the case. However, the fundamental difference is that Parliamentary sovereignty was paramount, and prevented any significant increases in levels of human rights protection under national law prior to the HRA35. Moreover, Parliament was free to remove or control individual liberties at any time by passing appropriate legislation. For example, in Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner36, it was asserted that there was no right to privacy in English law, which conflicts with the current legal position under the HRA. In the Malone case, the complaint regarding phone tapping during a police...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Parliamentary sovereignty
...?Parliamentary Sovereignty By Introduction In the prehistoric era man was slave to man. Traditionally, man was treated as an entity, astonishingly, by creatures belonging to his very own race, humans. Man was bought and sold in open markets. But with the passage of time things changed as we witnessed the era of renaissance, marked by the progress and development of man from an animal to a social animal. Though the times have changed but still, the struggle continued. Indeed the subjects changed, the barriers transformed and the roles in the society revolutionized but still man kept on striving for freedom and independence. The term freedom or independence here must not be associated to escaping from human slavery in fact over time... and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Parliamentary sovereignty
...?Parliamentary Sovereignty The notion of Parliamentary Sovereignty has been central to democratic practice for a considerable period of time. In a democracy, the legislature is elected by popular vote and this has been a major feature of the English Constitution. In the initial stages of democracy in Britain, liberty was at grave risk due to monarchical power.1 As a consequence of the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty, the Parliament was empowered to enact or rescind any law whatsoever. In addition, no individual or organisation was permitted by English Law to set aside or overrule legislation enacted by Parliament. In R (Jackson) v...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Parliamentary Sovereignty Essay
... of the of the Concerned Law 7 December Parliamentary Sovereignty To understand the concept of parliamentary sovereignty, one needs to look at it in a historical context. It took almost more than nine hundred years for the Parliament to emerge as an institution in the United Kingdom, which led to the emergence of the House of Commons and the House of Lords. It was in the fifteenth century that Henry V placed the two houses on the same footing, with the House of Commons representing the general citizenry while the House of Lords represented the nobility. However, it was in 1689, when with the passing of the Bill of Rights it was assured that the Parliament not only had a supremacy over the Crown but was also vested with the power... and the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Parliamentary Sovereignty
...is incorporated by an Act of Parliament.17 Under the monist theory, the treaty is binding on the signatory and will not require an Act of Parliament for ratification. According to Great Britain House of Commons, the “UK is a dualist state” and as such, “unless and until” a treaty is “incorporated into national law by legislation” it has no direct applicability in the UK.18 In this regard, unless and until an Act of Parliament incorporates a treaty, “national courts have no power to enforce treaty rights and obligations either on behalf of the Government or a private individual.”19 The dualist constitution is consistent with Dicey’s theory of Parliamentary sovereignty. According to Dicey,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Coursework
The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty
...in the society, and only in this situation it will be possible to adopt the necessary constitution. It may be predicted, that such changes will take place with time, though it is evident that this process will be slow and difficult, as the need to overcome the resistance of the legislative and executive establishments in the country may only happen in the light of the more essential issues and urgent needs. Accounting the present situation, even European structures are not able to initiate the adoption of such constitution and limitations due to the fact that he courts 'are still answering to the parliament', though it may also be viewed more as a matter of choice, than obligation. References (1) Allan, T. (1997)....
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Parliamentary Sovereignty
...Topic: Parliamentary Sovereignty Language Style: English UK Grade: 2 Answer: To understand and assess the question, it is necessary to look back to 1945 and a Europe that had been devastated by war: politically, economically, and socially. In the desire to attain some form of harmony in order to guarantee peace and to rebuild Europe. The Treaty on European Union (Maastricht) 1992 involved the creation of the European Union. UK incorporated of the EC law into domestic law by European Communities Act 1972. By virtue of ss .2 (1), 2(2), and 2(4) EC law was directly incorporated.1 Art. 221 provide that the Court of Justice will consist of fifteen judges. They are appointed is for six term of office of six years through the term... of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Is Parliamentary Sovereignty a Myth
...Is parliamentary sovereignty a myth? Sovereignty is defined as the supreme, absolute and uncontrollable power by which an independent is governed. It is the supreme political authority and the absolute power of the constitution to administrate a state. But the definition is some times questioned as it cannot be practiced as exactly in the definition. The concept of sovereignty is some times tossed between reality and myth. After a thorough analysis one may have bend to the opinion that sovereignty is a myth. When examining the history of Great Britain, one can discover that there existed sovereignty even in the feudal times. But in those days it resided unsteadily up on the monarch. 17th century witnessed a drastic change... in theory and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Parliamentary Sovereignty
...Parliamentary Sovereignty Thesis ment The European Communities Act compromises Parliamentary Supremacy in the UK. This has been established by the following discussion. Introduction Parliamentary Sovereignty is a basic tenet, which dictates as follows. Parliament is the supreme legislative body that can enact, annul, or modify any law. It can, in its discretion alter the laws enacted by its predecessors, if it deems fit to do so. As per the words of an eminent scholar, the soul of Parliamentary Sovereignty can be embodied in the statement, “What the Queen in Parliament enacts is law”.1 In a tacit manner, it can now...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Parliamentary sovereignty
...Act also the verdicts by the ECJ also Upper House that approve the sovereignty of the EU legitimate order. What remains, still is the theoretical concept that desperately reserved by those that still stress on the parliamentary power. Undeniably, the draft EU bill emphasize as much. However, seeking to embrace on to the spirit of legislative supremacy does nothing for it in real terms. To face up to the actual realities of the European Convention Act and the European authorized order may take time. However, once they fully acknowledged, it will be clear that under the UK law nobody has the authority to override or to set aside a law. It is no longer the case with the UK...
7 Pages(1750 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Is Parliamentary Sovereignty Still Applicable Today As It Was Previously for FREE!
Contact Us