Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...
Nobody downloaded yet

Self-Defence against Non-State Actors - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
In the paper “Self-Defence against Non-State Actors” the author answers the question: Does contemporary international law permit states to exercise the right to self-defense against non-state actors? The legitimate boundaries have always been a controversial focus of international law…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.1% of users find it useful
Self-Defence against Non-State Actors
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Self-Defence against Non-State Actors"

Download file to see previous pages Prior to 1945, there was no unified international prohibition on a unilateral resort to force and the UN Charter sought to radicalize international politics through a general prohibition on the use of unilateral force by member states. The prohibition was officially enshrined in Article 2(4) of the Charter, which provides that:
“All member states shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations”(UN Charter Article 2(4) 1945).
Despite the purported ban on the unilateral use of force, the parameters of Article 2(4)’s applicability have remained uncertain, with some questioning its practical efficacy as a protective measure against unilateral use of force (Dixon 2004). This is further highlighted by Reisman’s view that “Article 2(4) was never an independent ethical imperative of pacifism” (Reisman 1984). Indeed the wording of Article 2(4) would appear to underline this as the prohibition appears to be subject to the caveat that the unilateral force must not be “inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations” (UN Charter Article 2(4) 1945). This ambiguity is compounded by the failure to clarify what is a legitimate purpose of the United Nations, coupled with the right of member states to self-defense under Article 51 (UN Charter, Article 51 1945).
Moreover, the aftermath of September 11 has been utilized as a basis for reshaping the dimensions to the “legitimate” use of force under international law, with the legal definitions of self-defense being extended de facto to cover pre-emptive strikes (Dixon and McCorquodale, 2003). The most significant issues are the undermining of the legal validity of the right to self-defense under international law, which has been brought to the fore by military actions across borders against non-state sectors hiding. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(Self-Defence against Non-State Actors Assignment, n.d.)
Self-Defence against Non-State Actors Assignment.
(Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors Assignment)
Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors Assignment.
“Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors Assignment”.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Self-Defence against Non-State Actors

Critical Evaluation of Role of Non-State Actors

... the MNCs. In the modern context, analysts have further indicated MNCs to act as non-state actors accelerating the impact of globalisation1. As stated by various analysts, in the post-Cold War era, a considerable difference lays in the power enjoyed by the global players which radically influences the political, social and technological systems of the world. It is also said to continue until a “borderless and seamless” market is created which will allow the MNCs to play a significant role2. It is of no doubt that globalisation offers manifold opportunities to the MNCs and International Non-Governmental Organisations (INGOs) to serve the international market. This in turn influences the prosperity of different economies in terms of world...
26 Pages(6500 words)Essay

Research of self-defence case

... Self-defense What is the government's point of view? According to the vs. Appellant Johnny Rufus Belcher, the government finds Belcher guilty and thus liable to face murder charge. With the circumstances, surrounding the murder act notwithstanding, then the fact is that Belcher maimed Suber intentionally. Belcher’s arguments that the act occurred in his quest to defend himself is inexplicable. The government view on the use of a deadly weapon is such that, people who possess such deadly weapons illegally should be convicted. It is against the law for unauthorized persons to possess the illegal firearms. The government view is that, after Belcher confronted Suber, he went ahead, retrieved a gun from Brown and began shooting Suber...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Self-Defence and the War on Terror

Self-defence seems to be the viable option for many states in the use of force. Some states have even managed to justify their actions under self-defence principles, even if their actions did not exactly fulfil the minimum requirements of Article 51. Since self-defence is an exception to Article 2(4), the policy of the courts in interpreting self-defence has mostly been on the adoption of restrictive considerations (Sahmoudi, 2010). An attempt to expand the coverage of self-defence has been considered under anticipatory self-defence, an attack which is carried out before any initial attack by an aggressor state has been launched. However, widespread acceptance of this new concept has been largely. When the collapse of the USSR ca...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

The Role of Non-State Actors in World Politics

... that ensure the security of their people. Structuralists view on role of non-state actors in the world of politics Structuralists believe that non-state actors are set by states and serves in the interests of these states (Taylor 1984). Moreover, they believe that to some extent, the states serves the interest of some powerful individuals in the government. In this regard, they disregard the role played by non-state actors since they tend to serve the interest of states that formed or initiated their formation. However, this argument seems to be controversial because government institutions they claim to endorse constitutes individuals with self interests (Morgenthau 1949). In light with this argument, it is right to argue that state...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

The defence of self-defence

... facts. Ross is physically a very strong man, and he needed to protect himself not only against the first attempt of Samantha to injure or kill him but also her subsequent attempts. He needed to use at least as much force that would help him achieve that. His use of force did not instantly cause the death of Samantha. Therefore, Ross is innocent in the case of Samantha’s death. The defence of self-defence In the case under consideration, although Ross may be blamed for killing David, yet the blame that has been placed on him for killing Samantha is not right because what he did was an attempt to defend himself from the harm that Samantha was just about to cause him with her golf club. Self-defence makes a very important part of the English...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Non-Self Disclosure

...? Non-Self Disclosure NON-SELF DISCLOSURE Non self-disclosure is the act of withholding personal information and not telling someone the unknown aspects of your own life (Forrest, 2010). The facts withheld in this case should be personal and unknown to the listener. On the other side, self-disclosure is the act of giving personal information to unknown people. Non self-disclosure depends on a number of factors. One of the factors that determine; self-disclosure, or non-self-disclosure is the relationship of the involved individuals. To add to this, the urgency of need of the information will also determine. The state of mind of an individual also plays an important role in determining the extent to which self-disclosure can go up to. Non...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Non-state Actors Different From a Nation-State Actors

...Non-state Actors Different From a Nation-State Actors Security stability of a given country or state is significant for peace maintenance and general economic development a stable society will attract investors hence the government should ensure that there is political stability in the country. National interest is the basis of any nation if it is to fulfill what they intend to accomplish and are willing to protect its territories using its citizens, ideologies or its territories. Security not only has effects on the affected nation, but also to other neighboring nations. Therefore, when terrorists attack a nation it is seen as a global calamity. This has led to the establishment of security bodies dealing with international overseeing...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Civil Liability and Self-Defence

... the penalty of a life sentence following his alleged murder of a teen-aged intruder. No less than a police authority head rallied for a demand to put greater clarity in the law on self defence. It was charged that lawmakers must address this concern in order to give householders what real and specific right did they have against burglars.3 As earlier stated, the civil action on behalf of Bill must include the temporary employer, Pumps and Pipes and Jobs Galore, the employment agency. Alex is an employee of Jobs Galore who was contracted out to Pumps and Pipes who is therefore the temporary employer. It is basic in common civil law that the liability of the employee is likewise that of the employer especially in tort cases under...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

Secretary of State for Defence

...Advice to Secretary of for Defence The Secretary of for Defence is the Cabinet Minister with the responsibility of making and executing Defence policy, as well as furnishing the means by which it is performed. He is Chairman of the Defence Council and of the Army Board, the Air Force and the Admiralty Board Despite the responsibility for ultimately all components of Defence, the Secretary of State for Defence is backed by the Under-Secretary of State for Defence, the Minister of State for Defence Procurement, and the Minister of State for the Armed Forces. The Secretary of State for Defence allocates duties to them for specific components of the Armed Forces and the MoD's issues. But the following are particularly his responsibilities...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Attributability of the Conduct of Non-State Actors

... that fall in favour of the violent NSAs, and modify its conduct accordingly to prevent public apprehension. Some restriction and censorship policies must be self-imposed by the NSA to prevent terrorists from achieving the motives. States and governments, hence, are not the only players in triggering and countering terrorism in the world. They are parts of a larger mesh that includes diverse and significant non-state actors. While some of these are the cause of it, for instance the insurgent groups, others count it as a responsibility to expunge this global crisis from the roots, like the UN, which holds great authority over its member states. Some NSAs motivate terrorist actions indirectly, like the oil corporations, while...
13 Pages(3250 words)Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Self-Defence against Non-State Actors for FREE!

Contact Us