Memo Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 6. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1681630-memo
Memo Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 6. https://studentshare.org/law/1681630-memo.
Airing of this content was done by only a few people among the CBS employees however, they failed on their duties. In this case, the entire CBS is held responsible for the actions of the employees who aired the content in the course of undertaking their duties.
FCC had earlier come up with three ethics, these are explicit scenery of the portrayal of sexual organs or activities. The substance dwells on or repeats an extent portrayal of sexual organs or activities. The last one is whether the substance appears to tamper or is used to titillate, or whether it may intensify the probable indecency of broadcast. FCC has made all the principles and laws clear whereby any form of exposure is prohibited by the law.
Pacifica's challenge on FCC's fleeting expletives is a decent illustration of infringement of the set standards and principles by FCC. Amid a mid-afternoon radio show, George Carlin's monolog was publicized by a radio station. The monologs had smudged words in them that shouldn't be said in an open wireless transmission. The audience members have cautioned before a probability of sensitive and offensive dialect. Later a protestation was sent to FCC by a man who claimed to have listened to the show while driving with his young child. A result of the fact that monologue contained non-scripted spoken vulgarity obscene words during a live radio broadcast makes it a fleeting expletive
The FCC and Fox can be used as a prime example in this case whereby the ABC claimed to have not received a fair advertisement preceding to the broadcasts in question from FCC. This is the fact that fleeting invectives and short-lived nudity could actionably be found indecent, where the FCC’s overall policy is clear and which requires it to have a context-specific inspection of each purportedly offensive program to determine whether it needs censuring or not. However, I concur that the center renunciation by the court is incorrect that the Super Bowl broadcast sanctioning established a mysterious departure from the FCC’s previous indecency rule.
The FCC rules are clear on airing offensive content in the national language. They have also made the principles and rules clear. This makes it clear that the brevity of any kind of indecent broadcast whether word or image cannot immunize it from FCC censure.
Read More