StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

United States, Petitioner v. Xavier Alvarez - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
It is governed by seven member elected officials each tasked with supplementing the organization’s mission. Xavier Alvarez is a member of the board and has the right to represent the body…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97% of users find it useful
United States, Petitioner v. Xavier Alvarez
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "United States, Petitioner v. Xavier Alvarez"

Task: United s, Petitioner v. Xavier Alvarez. Three Valleys Water District Board is an agency charged with various responsibilities. It is governed by seven member elected officials each tasked with supplementing the organization’s mission. Xavier Alvarez is a member of the board and has the right to represent the body within the capacity limited by organization’s laws. On 23rd July 2007, Mr. Alvarez got an invitation to speak in a joint meeting with Walnut Valley District Board. The anticipated speech was to touch on his background as an employ of the partner agency. Mr. Alvarex stated that he is a retired from the marine in 2001 after working for 25 years from 1987.

He justified the work by saying to have been acknowledged by the Congressional Medal of Honor while, in essence, this was not true. In addition, he had not worked for the military forces. Evidently, a federal law under the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 criminalizes lying regarding military decorations. Apart from protecting the name of the institution, the Act protected the valor of the actual people who had the ward. The military is a sensitive government body that should not have its name used to impress or gain respect.

By claiming to have worked and got a reward from the Congressional Medal of Honor, he committed an offense punishable by the United States law. If everybody is allowed to falsely claim an award in every institution, what will be the integrity of the wards? What role will they play to the actual people receiving them? Will it be a motivation or a formality because we cannot differentiate between the real holders and false one? These questions make Xavier Alvarez guilty for violating the Stolen Valor Act of 2005.

Undeniably, United States v. Cabrales stipulates that a person can only be charged after committing an offense.On the other hand, the first amendment right entitles everybody to a freedom of speech as in the case United States v. Stevens. The rights stipulate that people have the right to speak liberally without intrusion from the government. Interestingly, the amendment has limit of speech to obscenity, incitement, child pornography, true threats, criminal conduct or deformation. The question, therefore, is whether Stolen Valor Act protects lies about the military or it infringes and restricts speech with regards to its content.

Before pointing a finger to Xavier Alvarez, it is important to assess if the law is restrictive or constitutional. In conclusion, the case Lane v. Franks, the Supreme Court questions the extent of free speech with regards to qualified immunity. This subjects rulings into more scrutiny as punishable acts under the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 could be violating freedom of speech. Concurrently, Miller v. California case shows that a law can ban materials that are neither obscene nor harmful. Subsequently, responsible speech is important as evidenced in Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper.

In the case, awareness creation is imperative to educate and make amendments of speech limitations; however, Alvez is guilty according to Tory v. Cochran of using inappropriately the name of a sensitive institution.Works CitedAIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES CORP. v. HOEPER. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 27 April 2014. .ASHCROFT v. FREE SPEECH COALITION. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 27 April 2014. .TORY v. COCHRAN. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law.

25 April 2014. .UNITED STATES v. ALVAREZ. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 27 April 2014. .UNITED STATES v. CABRALES. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 25 April 2014. .UNITED STATES v. STEVENS. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 27 April 2014. .

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“United States, Petitioner v. Xavier Alvarez Essay”, n.d.)
United States, Petitioner v. Xavier Alvarez Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1643153-united-states-petitioner-v-xavier-alvarez
(United States, Petitioner V. Xavier Alvarez Essay)
United States, Petitioner V. Xavier Alvarez Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1643153-united-states-petitioner-v-xavier-alvarez.
“United States, Petitioner V. Xavier Alvarez Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1643153-united-states-petitioner-v-xavier-alvarez.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF United States, Petitioner v. Xavier Alvarez

People's Mujahidin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State

united states Department of State [Author] [Institution] Introduction The people's Mujahidin of Iran, commonly known as the Mujahedeen e Khalq (Mek as it will be referred), is an exile Iranian Organization which has been popularly known to be working to overthrow the regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran.... It was done to cease their working inside the united states.... A listing in the FTO means that all assets an organization has in the united states will be overtaken by the government and the organization will not be allowed to hold any activity, even peaceful, inside the U....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The book YO by julia alvarez

Even after leaving for the united states, Yo's mother cannot disentangle her self from her worries about Yo's stories.... By Julia alvarez Name: Institution: Course: Tutor: Date: Families and acquaintances of raconteurs are always at the brink of exposure of details of their private lives, especially when the storyteller anticipates such to be a success upon its publication.... In alvarez's Yo, she narrates Yolanda's story through different characters, while Yo is given no slightest chance to shield herself from all the “venoms” spat in her way....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Wearing of Armbands in Public Schools

The other petitioner, Mary Beth Tinker, was a junior high school student and John's sister.... Tinker v.... Des Moines Author Institution Abstract Tinker Et Al.... vs.... Des Moines case explores the issue on whether symbolic protest contravenes 1st Amendment freedom of speech protections....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Mojahedin Organization of Iran Versus United States Department of State

united states Department of State, 613 F.... Parties People Moujahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), the petitioner in this case, is a political group in Iran while the Respondent was the united states Department of State.... Parties People Moujahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), the petitioner in this case, is a political group in Iran while the Respondent was the united states Department of State.... In the united states, such organizations were listed as Foreign Terrorist Organizations under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA)....
3 Pages (750 words) Case Study

Remedies under the Corporation Act 2006

In fact, in Re Norvabron Pty Ltd (No 2) (1986) 11 ACLR 33, this can even include an act which took place before the petitioner became a shareholder.... Generally, a minority shareholder has at least two statutory remedies under the Corporation Act 2006 or CA 2006.... These remedies are: (1) an application to have the company wound up on the 'just and equitable' ground (s 122(1)(g) IA 1986); and (2) an application for an order from the court on the ground that the company's affairs are being conducted in a manner which is 'unfairly prejudicial' (Part 30 CA 206, ss 994-998)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

United States Supreme Court

 … The paper represents the question whether a debtor can “strip down” the lien of the creditor on the real property pledged as collateral for the debt to the value of the collateral; more specifically, the united states Supreme Court was asked to determine the applicability of section 506 to this particular set of circumstances.... The question presented is whether a debtor can “strip down” the lien of the creditor on the real property pledged as collateral for the debt to the value of the collateral; more specifically, the united states Supreme Court was asked to determine the applicability of section 506(d) to this particular set of circumstances....
2 Pages (500 words) Article

Olmstead vs. United States

Dore argued for petitioners and the Attornety General of united states along with Mr.... Doherty argued on behalf of united states.... 33)”;… united states of America, argued on same day and decided by same court on a single day.... united states, individually....
4 Pages (1000 words) Term Paper

Supreme Court of the United States

“Barbara Grutter, petitioner v.... The ‘narrowly tailored' concept therefore establishes constitutionality of the university's provisions under the Grutter case but unconstitutionality under the Grantz case (Supreme Court of the united states 4; Supreme Court of the United States1 31).... Works citedSupreme Court of the united states.... ?? Supreme Court of the united states.... ?? Supreme Court of the united states....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us