StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State, 613 F.3d 220, (D.C. Cir. 2010) - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Title: Case Brief Name: Course: Tutor: May 12, 2013 People’s Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State, 613 F.3d 220, and (D.C. Cir. 2010). Parties People Moujahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), the petitioner in this case, is a political group in Iran while the Respondent was the United States Department of State…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful
Peoples Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State, 613 F.3d 220, (D.C. Cir. 2010)
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State, 613 F.3d 220, (D.C. Cir. 2010)"

Case Brief May 12, People’s Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United s Department of 613 F.3d 220, and (D.C. Cir. 2010). Parties People Moujahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), the petitioner in this case, is a political group in Iran while the Respondent was the United States Department of State. Facts Acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the Security Council in the late 1990s authorized sanctions on certain terrorist organizations and entities. However, it left the modalities to its member states to operationalise national listing of individual organizations and persons and to implement the sanctions. In the United States, such organizations were listed as Foreign Terrorist Organizations under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). AEDPA gave the secretary of state powers to designate an organization as FTO for a period of two years. The effects of such listing are dire. For instance, the secretary of the treasury department can freeze all the assets of such an organization. Members of an FTO are prohibited from entering into the United States and any person who provides material support to such an organization risks a fine and/or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 15 years (Nizkor, 2012). After the lapse of the two years, the secretary of state was required to either renew the designation or not, and if s/he did not, the designation would be allowed to lapse. However, this requirement was amended to the effect that such designation did not lapse but after every two years organization listed as such could file a petition for delisting. The Act requires that the Secretary of State shall Act on such a petition within 180 days. The Secretary is required to revoke the listing if s/he finds that either the circumstances that led to such listing have ceased or if the national security required so. In doing so, the secretary could rely on classified and/or unclassified information. If the secretary refuses the revocation, the organization can seek review within 30 days of such a decision. PMOI was first listed as PMOI in 1997, and the designation subsequently renewed to 2003. On July 15 2008, PMOI filed such a petition, listing several grounds among them that it had renounced terror, had been sharing intelligence with the government regarding Iran Nuclear program and that indeed its members had received protection under the Geneva convention. On January 7 2009, the secretary denied the petition based on several grounds. Prior proceeding Consequently, PMOI applied for courts review on the grounds that the secretary’s finding lacked substantial support and that the secretary failed to accord it due process (In Re: People’s Moujahedin Organization of Iran, Petitioner,2012). The court ruled in its favor and ordered the secretary to avail the unclassified information she had relied on, and instructed her to indicate which sources she found to be sufficient to maintain the designation. The court also made several orders, but which the secretary was slow in complying with. However, the unclassified material was later on availed to PMOI on October 18 2010 by the Department of Justice (DOJ) acting on behalf of the Secretary. It required PMOI to make submissions on the same which it duly did. However, since then, no action had been taken despite numerous correspondences between the two. Therefore on 27th February 2012, PMOI applied for an order of mandamus. Issues Did the secretary’s delay in making a decision on PMOI’s petition entitle them to a judicial review order? Arguments The petitioner argued that it had denounced terrorism, which was evidenced by the fact that, following 2001, no act of violence had taken place, that was attributed to it. Moreover, its members had been classified as combatants under the Geneva Convention after thorough vetting by US forces, which had established no element of criminality. To add, it argued that failure to delist was merely political, to avoid sparking a reaction from Iran. The petitioners argued that it was a clear intention of congress to provide for judicial review for such listing, since congress had refused to insulate FTO designation from courts. The statutory time limit of 180 had passed and the secretary’s actions were to merely frustrate any review. In addition, the petitioner argued that continued listing predisposed its members to violence, such as a recent attack on its camp Ashraf by Iraq forces based on FTO listing. Ruling The court held that the secretary’s delay on acting on the PMOI’s petition was ‘egregious’. The court also held that failure by the secretary to act on its orders, effectively nullified a remand mandate it had issued in 2010. The court refused to immediately issue an order of mandamus, because the matter touched on national security and foreign policy. Instead, the court ordered the secretary to either allow or reject the petition within four months, failure of which the court would issue an order of mandamus. Rationale The failure by the secretary to make a decision was putting the petitioner in an administrative limbo, by maintaining PMOI’s listing and denying the petitioner opportunity to seek review. Thus the failure to act insulated her decision from the courts review. In addition, the secretary’s failure to act within the statutory limit of 180 days balanced in favor of granting the order of mandamus, since such a timeline manifests the intention that the secretary must act promptly. In addition, unlike other instances of national security where the court exercises judicial restraint, in this scenario the congress had empowered the court to review the decision of the secretary. Works Cited Nizkor, Equipo. (2012). U.S. Court Issues Writ of Mandamus, Effectively Removing Organization from Terror List: In Re People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran. Retrieved from http://derechos.org/nizkor/excep/mojahedin.html People’s Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State, 613 F.3d 220, (D.C. Cir. 2010). Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department Case Study”, n.d.)
People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department Case Study. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1478166-peopleyies-moujahedin-organization-of-iran-v
(People'S Moujahedin Organization of Iran V. United States Department Case Study)
People'S Moujahedin Organization of Iran V. United States Department Case Study. https://studentshare.org/law/1478166-peopleyies-moujahedin-organization-of-iran-v.
“People'S Moujahedin Organization of Iran V. United States Department Case Study”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1478166-peopleyies-moujahedin-organization-of-iran-v.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State, 613 F.3d 220, (D.C. Cir. 2010)

Organization and Functions of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies

Threats may either appear in the form of terrorism or from other intelligence groups or from the espionage. It may arise within the country, against the existing government or social systems. Though most of the federal law enforcement groups are investigative groups, they are not only focused on investigations but stand for the people. One can see that the importance of the federal agencies is growing day by day because the threats from militants and others have considerably increased. Such kinds of federal law enforcement agencies include Federal Air Marshalls, Secret Service, FBI, Untouchables, C.I.A and Federal Corrections etc. The organization and functions of these agencies vary in different fields and can be cited in the fol...
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study

Can One Person Make a Difference in an Organization

Each individual has something to contribute but at times one person can make a difference to an organization.
Technology today has made it possible to retain and conserve knowledge and transmit it to other people in an organization. The knowledge that has been created by a single individual can be a powerful weapon when retained, transmitted, disseminated and applied. According to Nonaka, new knowledge begins with an individual (Chaston, Badger & Sadler-Smith, 1999). When the new knowledge is generated it is merged with the existing knowledge and new knowledge from other sources and provides the basis for new products and processes. Thus knowledge has been classified into two categories – explicit and tacit. Explici...
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Are Disabled People Going To Be Winners Or Losers

This dissertation will, therefore, establish whether the White Paper will bring real benefits to the disabled or whether the concerns of organizations working for the disabled are actually well-founded.

People who are in work have better opportunities to improve their lives and consequently visit their GPs less often. Even their children and partners benefit. It gives many people self-esteem, companionship, and status.

The initial aim, therefore, is to investigate whether the provisions in the White Paper can theoretically deliver these benefits. This will provide an opportunity to identify any loopholes or gaps in the government’s plan.

The second aim is to then consider the objections to th...
6 Pages (1500 words) Dissertation

Information Security Policy of Organization

In the modern age of information technology, there are many threats created for organizational information. Organizations need a security model that has the capability to handle and secure our information reserves. Technical administrative safety /security measures like security plans, actions and procedures are the general practices for the organizational information security procedures. The attentiveness of producing actions is concerned by the organizations to an appreciably smaller level, on the other hand at the same time these are weighed up as being further efficient organizational actions than technical administrative ones. Information security encompasses organizational features, officially authorized aspects, institution...
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

The Great Gatsby by F Scott Fitzgerald

... in a flowing white dress, such that the reader sees a clean slate, a blank canvas and a picture of innocence which is how many people choose to see America. Nick Calloway, the story’s narrator, gives a hint as to how such a blank slate might not be a great thing as he describes the first glimpse of Daisy to be had: “They were both in white, and their dresses were rippling and fluttering as if they had just been blown back in after a short flight around the house … the caught wind died out about the room, and the curtain and the rugs and the two young women ballooned slowly to the floor” (8). By equating Daisy and her friend Jordan with the curtains and rugs, Nick indicates that neither of them has a personality or presence of their own...
10 Pages (2500 words) Book Report/Review

International Affairs v. Liberalism

As a matter of fact, Hoffman’s statement that “international affairs is the nemesis of liberalism” has a grain of truth in it and this is especially so after the 9/11 incident.
There are two schools of thought or perspectives that are used to view international affairs: liberalism and realism. The study of these two perspectives is significant to the idea posed by Stanley Hoffman because they determine the reasons why international affairs, according to him, does not only see eye-to-eye with liberalism but seems to stand on the opposing side of it.
Liberalism can be defined as having four elements: citizens; the legislature; property rights, and; a market-driven economy (Dunne 186). Realism, on the othe...
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Showdown with Iran

One of the factors that made the US become wary is that Iran staged one of their biggest military exercises this year and it showed that they could gain supremacy and power in the Persian Gulf. This would be dangerous considering that despite America being more technologically advanced, Islam is very powerful in the world. America could probably win against Iran, but it would not win against Islam.
The United States is afraid of Irans' efforts to develop nuclear weapon capability and what it will do once it gains that type of power. There are satellite photographs that suggest the existence of Iran's nuclear facilities. Although strategists say that Iran really isn't a threat and it was suggested that America already had the...
9 Pages (2250 words) Movie Review

Immigration and Its Impact on the United Kingdom

For example, for farming communities, fertile and well-watered land has been a pull factor in migration. Business opportunities and political stability are also examples of pull factors.
Since the turn of the 20th century, Great Britain and Northern Ireland have experienced a great influx of foreigners migrating into the country due to pull or push factors. There have been different waves of migrations to the United Kingdom, which has had different impacts. Because of this, the United Kingdom has had to respond in several ways, which includes coming up with new acts on immigration, nationality, and providing asylum to refugees.1 However, the topic of migration to the United Kingdom has attracted different political views and...
23 Pages (5750 words) Assignment

International Business: World Economic Forum and Davos 2010

While each force of globalization is important, the technological revolution has impacted the business models, value creation and differentiation (Spelman, 2010). The cloud computing technologies that have made the popular social networking applications possible are now being applied to development, healthcare, and society. Today mobile telephones are more like powerful computers that take care of many of the societal challenges facing both developed and developing countries (Evans, 2010). In Chile, new software enables weather information to farmers who can now make informed decisions on when and how to sow or harvest the crops. However, the fear or ignorance of cloud computing technology could harm the chances of the SMEs becomi...
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Globalization and World Economic Forum at Davos 2010

... optimism. After witnessing a decline of 2.2% in 2009, the global economy is expected to grow by 2.7% in 2010 as stated by the World Bank. But this recovery is expected to be fragile. The unemployment crisis will exacerbate before thawing. Deleveraging the debt overhang will be a drag on the growth in GDP. Stephan Roach, Chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia has stated that the bursting of the housing bubble and recession shocks to unemployment will reduce the trend growth in real consumption in the United States to 1.5% to 2% over the next three to five years compared with 4% in the pre-crisis decade. The recovery will be the weakest recovery witnessed so far in the modern era, making the global economy susceptible to double dip recession...
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State, 613 F.3d 220, (D.C. Cir. 2010) for FREE!

Contact Us