CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Sentencing in International Law Requires Reasoned Discrimination
Name: Professor: Course: Date: Introduction Racial discrimination in the criminal justice system is prevalent in areas where the minority ethnic groups reside.... This discrimination goes unreported or always neglected.... discrimination usually occurs to individuals who belong to a group either marginalized or belonging to a group that with history of social stigmatization.... The race-based discrimination is the greatest crime in the criminal justice system where the targeted individuals face more aggressive and punishments as compared to the total population....
7 Pages
(1750 words)
Essay
According to the legal definition, a delinquent juvenile is a child who commits criminal acts that are punishable by law.... The above concept of the law has been ignored by the criminal justice system, since juvenile offenders lack the cognitive and mental capacity to reason and form intent while committing criminal acts like murder and assault (Albanese & Dammer, 2011 p.... Delinquent juveniles should not be tried as adults Name: Institution: Abstract: Prosecuting and sentencing delinquent juveniles is a major problem with the criminal justice system....
6 Pages
(1500 words)
Essay
In the years where the feminist movement was strong, the clamor for laws in relation to gender discrimination was very much significant.... This essay "How Far Has law Moved Away From Binary Understandings of Sex and Gender" focuses on gender issues that have always been rampant in many parts of the world.... This paper will now discuss how far the law has moved away from binary understandings of sex and gender.... The extent to which the law has moved away from binary understandings of sex and gender is a matter which can be evaluated based on specific topics, including the sexing of the body through male and female circumcisions and the sexing of the child....
18 Pages
(4500 words)
Essay
Universal jurisdiction application of international law
... ith respect to criminal offences, prescriptive jurisdiction is the state's power pursuant to international law to apply its law to interpretation and prosecution of an offence.... Under international law, a jurisdiction in criminal matters can be either enforcement jurisdiction or prescribed, also known as prescriptive jurisdiction.... ccording to the dissenting opinion of Van den Wyngaert, the definition of universal jurisdiction is not clearly established under international Convention or customary international law with the result that the definition is uncertain (Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 also known as Joint Separate Opinion of Judges Higgins, Koijmans and Brugenthal)....
8 Pages
(2000 words)
Essay
The essay "Sentencing Within the Criminal Justice System" is primarily purposed to discuss the principles of sentencing that are required to be proportionate, consistent, free from improper discrimination, compliant with human rights, and transparent.... sentencing within the criminal justice system serves a number of purposes.... Secondly, sentencing serves to reduce crime.... Third, sentencing allows reparation to the victims of an offense or those otherwise harmed by an offense....
5 Pages
(1250 words)
Essay
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 is also commonly stated as SRA; it drew a comprehensive outline for restructuring of judicial sentencing discretion that essentially changed altogether the sentencing in the federal justice system.... The mid of 20th century was characterized by a new faith in progressivism along with populism ruled the formation of law for prisonersю.... While progressives had failed to provide an alternative to indeterminate sentencing, populism was seen as something that negated the spirit of the law and it was declared that "Federal judges are not responsive to the pulsations of humanity....
12 Pages
(3000 words)
Essay
Following the concern of the discrimination that two elemental notions in sentencing engendered, justices Callinan, Gaudron and Gummow had a joint judgment.... The rules of criminal procedure in a court of law allow an offender to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty and if the offender fails to enter any plea, the court enters a plea of not guilty on for the offender and then begins the trial (Howie, 2008).... The paper 'Queensland Courts in Australia ' presents sentencing discounts to defendants who plead guilty to offenses....
10 Pages
(2500 words)
Case Study
Impairing three centuries of colonial subjugation when it finally attained its independence in 1991, Ukraine has faced tremendous difficulties in instituting democracy, taking in a rule of law.... The enactment of a constitution in June 1996 articulating Ukraine's aim to adopt a rule of law was summoned by the Council of Europe.... he National Commission for the Strengthening of Democracy and the Rule of law, an organization founded in 2005 within the presidential secretariat to check and examine adherence to the Copenhagen standards for potential membership in the European Union (EU), endorsed a draft model for the restructuring of the criminal justice system which suggests extensive reforms aspiring to improve criminal legislation and reorganize the entire system based on human rights....
26 Pages
(6500 words)
Research Paper