Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Federal sentencing reform Act (SRA) enjoys quite an eventful history of development and evolution in the United States. The mid of 20th century was characterized by a new faith in progressivism along with populism ruled the formation of law for prisonersю…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.7% of users find it useful
The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control"

Download file to see previous pages By 1970s, however, both progressivism and populism lost their appeal as stand-alone policies (Vito & Allen, 1981). While progressives had failed to provide an alternative to indeterminate sentencing, populism was seen as something that negated the spirit of the law and it was declared that "Federal judges are not responsive to the pulsations of humanity." These themes dominated SRA for some time and culminated in the development of Federal sentencing Act of 1984 with one primary aim i.e. to be fair in the purposes of imprisonment.The US Congress played a slight and indirect role in federal sentencing for about a century or so by vesting into the sentencing judge an unbarred discretion to figure out the appropriate punishment from usually a diverse ambit of potential sentences as been described by law. This rendered the judge to be in total control of sentencing and it was up to the judge only to envisage various aspects of sentencing the relevant aggravating and mitigating circumstances and how these all factors jointly contributed to the commissioning of the sentence. The judicial sentences were virtually subject to no review on appeal. The underlying rationale of the whole exercise was based upon "coercive rehabilitation." That invariably involved judge deciding an extensive punishment of long duration and the parole board contemplating release on the grounds of adequate rehabilitation. That whole system relied heavily on the personal discretion of the judge without much accountability. This was naturally bound to criticism as with problems caused as a result of authority wielding undeterred personal discretion and seen largely as foot loose and fancy free scenario. Congress was acutely aware by 1970s of the growing unease among the general public and pervasive problems in the judicial system that were emanating due to the lack of well defined parameters in sentence commissioning. The disparity in the sentencing system lead to a thorough evaluation by Congress in 1984 in which it was known that the whole system was in the dire need of reform and had lost the necessary credibility required to sustain the public confidence to serve as a sufficient deterrent to crime. It was concluded in that study the inconsistency and disparity in the sentencing system was due to the inadequate sentencing application by the judiciary. Congress took initiative to redress the problem by enacting the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 is also commonly stated as SRA; it drew a comprehensive outline for restructuring of judicial sentencing discretion that essentially changed altogether the sentencing in the federal justice system. The SRA's prime objective was to overcome the chasm of sentencing disparity. The first step that Congress took was to reject the prevalent view of rehabilitation as the foremost goal of sentencing. It redefined the objectivity of sentence as retributive, educational, and deterrent (Howell, 2004). By enacting SRA Congress sought to bring the whole judicial process above board ultimately helping it regain the trust of masses important to discourage crime, revitalizing the system by modifying its dynamics, curbing over dependence on imprisonment and upholding the dignity and discretion of judges faculty. The important points(USSC, 1991) of SRA could be summarized as follow:
1. There should be a clear and comprehensive statement of sentencing of federal law along with ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control Essay”, n.d.)
The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control Essay. Retrieved from
(The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control Essay)
The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control Essay.
“The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control

Sentencing Guidelines Reform

Likewise alternatives have been looked at for offenders of non-violent crime, such as community service. The Need for Sentencing Reforms The prison population has been rapidly growing for many years, with an increase of 7% in the period from 2000 to 2005 (King, 2007). The cost per day per prisoner of keeping criminals incarcerated is significant making the increases in prison population detrimental to the budgets of many states. In addition, there are costs associated with building new prisons if the population increases to that extend, and the associated space and land use. This places heavy demand on policy makers to try and determine sentencing laws and reforms that will limit the prison population. Punishments for crime are d...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Federal Medical Malpractice Reform

The American Medical association and several Congressional work groups including the Simpson-Bowles commission and the Domenici-Rivlin Debt Reduction Task Force have voiced strong opinion that reform in the sector lies at the heart of servicing federal deficit and securing justice for injured patients. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that in the next decade up to $ 62.4 billion will be spent on a defective medical malpractice system. In light of these facts and the majority public support for reform in the sector, the failure of the bipartisan malpractice reform bill at the senate that was slated to cap non-economic damages at $250, 000 and indeed countrywide failure to comprehensively enact reform legislation requi...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Immigration Reform and Control Act

Other programs like the Agricultural worker program also provided permanent residency status to more illegal immigrants. Border patrols were enforced while all employers were required to verify the legal status of the job candidates as regards the authority to work in the US within three days after employment offer. The Act led to increase in the number of illegal immigrants and other social problems like low wages. Immigration reform and Control Act Immigration Reform and Control Act-requirements and issues in workplace Introduction Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 was enacted to deal with various immigration problems. Section 1324a of the Act prohibits employees to hire or continue employing illegal immigrants with pr...
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper

Prison Sentencing Reform-Juveniles

Recent developments in the American Justice System allowed the courts to sentence juveniles to life imprisonment without parole. The controversial issue has attracted heated debates in the American society and some people have petitioned the Supreme Court to overrule the policy. It is, however, a very good way of safeguarding the American society since the maximum sentencing is only done on juvenile offenders whose crimes could attract capital punishment or life imprisonment if they were adults. Some of these crimes include murder and rape among other serious crimes. The sentencing has been devised in order to keep the dangerous juvenile criminals away from the society. It is believed that the life imprisonment is a viable reform...
10 Pages(2500 words)Term Paper

Constitutional Reform Act of 2005

...In this assignment I draw on Parpworth, Bradley & Ewing and Allen &Thompson thoughts and ideas to discuss and explore The Constitutional Reform Act of 2005. I will discuss and explore the question has The Constitutional Reform Act of 2005 transformed the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature I will take a further look at the major principles including the Principle of the Separation of Powers, powers of the state and the work of government. In doing so I propose that the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005 has indeed transformed the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature. The answer is not straight forward although perhaps the most significant change is the role of authority between the Executive...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

Care must however be taken by policemen in the exercise of the powers assigned to them in the Act. This is because non-conformity with the specific terms of the act may bring about a criminal liability and on the other hand searching, arresting, detaining and interviewing suspects outside the provisions of the act may render the evidences produced inadmissible in court.
Perpetrators of serious crimes like murder, treason and the like were being arrested without warrant following an act of parliament in 1967.Further update of the police powers relating to the common law ,particularly as contained in the act of 1967,were carried out by a Royal Commission headed by Sir Cyril Phillips.
Following an upsurge in crime particular...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Federal Sentencing Guidelines

...Federal Sentencing Guidelines Federal sentencing guidelines are the rules permissions to view a criminal with that act. These guidelines are the standard principles prepared by federal criminal justice system and approved by United States Sentencing Commissions. These guidelines are published in a manner so that the entire nation can openly read and contend themselves that the decision made by the court is not wrong. These guidelines may also help criminal to get prepare for the punishments before they seize themselves in any crime. The judge while dealing with a case selects the sentence from this guideline and makes decision. Other judges approve these sentences if sentence from the guideline applied correctly or not. Judges are allowed...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Prison sentencing reform-juveniles

This is normally motivated by peer pressure whereby the deviant teenagers lure their friends to commit crimes in the name of having thrilling fun in their neighborhoods. Most American kids get away with the crimes they commit since the people in the community seldom take the matters to court but those who are not lucky enough to be forgiven face trials and they are given various sentences by the courts.
Delinquent juveniles may be incarcerated by the court as punishment, depending on the gravity of their actions. This normally happens when the crime committed by the juvenile could attract a heavy sentencing penalty if he or she was an adult. Repeat juvenile offenders also attract incarceration sentences. Juvenile offenders ma...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

The Immigration Reform and Control Act

... The Immigration Reform and control Act renders it unlawful for any employer to allow any individual that is not legally authorized to work within the country to be eligible for employment by any employer (Aguilera & Michael p 239). Since Patricia’s restaurant, business ails within the borders of the country, the laws and the consequence of breaking this law applies to her and her business hence she would only be allowed by the law to offer employment to only legally recognized individuals. Patricia is therefore required by the law to verify the employment eligibility of all its new employees (Plump & Carolyn p 23-39). If the employer does not comply with this law and goes ahead to employ an alien, the employer may face both civil...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Occupiers Liability Act of 1984

... work Assessment Introduction: The law regarding occupier’s liability differentiates a person who is a legal visitor from a trespasser. The Occupier’s Liability Act 1957 deals with lawful entrants or legal visitors, whereas the Occupier’s Liability Act 1984 deals with trespassers, or illegal transgressors. This case study is a mixed bag, containing both legal entrants and also illegal visitors (trespassers). However, as imposed by the Act passed in 1984, the law also imposes duties and performances by occupiers with respect to protection and other considerations being meted out to trespassers in human injury- prone premises. Occupier’s Liability Act 1984: Under normal circumstances, the law does not encourage trespassers on private...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The Federal Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and Social Control for FREE!

Contact Us