Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1489915-oj-simpson-trail-case-analysis
https://studentshare.org/law/1489915-oj-simpson-trail-case-analysis.
As for the blood sample, the actual killer had spilt blood near the shoe prints at Bundy. Secondly, the blood that had been spilt at Bundy matched Simpson’s blood type. The gravity of the matter here is that a paltry 0.5% of the population would match with this sample. Again, Simpson had sustained fresh cuts on his left hand, after Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman’s murder. The same blood type was also found in Bronco; and in foyer and master bedroom to Simpson’s home. Again, the same blood type was found in Simpson’s driveway.
There was also blood type found on Simpson’s socks in O.J. Simpson’s home. The blood type on Simpson’s socks matched Nicole’s. As can be seen in The Trial of O. J. Simpson: the Incriminating Evidence (2013), the glove evidence also heavily implicates Simpson. For one, a left-hand glove was found left at Bundy. The right-hand glove was found at Simpson’s residence. Again, the gloves were Aris gloves, and were size XL. Again, in 1990, Nicole Brown had purchased a pair of Aris XL gloves at Bloomingdale.
Importantly, from 1990 to June 1994, O. J. Simpson had been wearing Aris Light gloves of size XL. As if the foregoing is not enough, the shoe evidence directly implicated O. J. Simpson. The shoe prints that were found at Bundy were from a size 12 Bruno Magli shoe. Again, the shoes had and left a bloody impression on Bronco carpet; and the impression was consistent with a Magli shoe. Importantly and interestingly, Simpson wore a size 12 Bruno Magli shoes. Again, it is important and interesting that the driver who was to take Simpson to the airport could neither see nor reach Bronco and when phone calls began getting through to Simpson, there were peculiar reactions from Simpson, revealing Nicole Brown’s death.
Prima facie evidence on the other hand is the evidence that when uncontested, would establish a fact or bring about a presumption of a fact. In this case, the fact is that O. J. Simpson’s ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and a waiter Ronald Lyle Goldman. Secondly, there are indications that O.J. Simpson’s actions may have caused the deaths of the two. First, at 9:36 PM, Kato was seen by Kato Kaelin wearing a dark sweat suit. At 10:40 PM, 10:43 PM and 10:49 PM, Allan Park unsuccessfully tries to get to Simpson through his intercom.
Between 10:50 and 10:51, Kato Kaelin heard three thumps on the wall outside his room. Again, at 10:54, Allan Park saw a six-feet tall man weighing about and 200 pounds and in dark clothes, walking across Simpson residence’s driveway. At 10:55, Simpson lied to Allan Park about his whereabouts. All these developments are indicative of Simpson’s identity and an unclear conscience. The applicable code that the prosecution was brought under is public good. The prosecution acknowledged that the case was for the public good and that to this effect, justice is dispensed with equal measure and even-handedly.
For this, the case was titled, People of the State of California vs. O.J. Simpson. The prosecution also ensured that s/he is not engaging an unrepresented accused and that the accused is accorded all his pretrial rights like the right to a preliminary hearing. It is for this case that O. J. Simpson had a solid defense
...Download file to see next pages Read More