Counterterrorism Grand Strategy Name Institution Instructor Date Counter Terrorism Strategy Counter terrorism has become one of the top priorities of many countries since the attacks that took place at the World Trade Centre. No one can deny the presence of terrorism but in defining terrorism, there are many differences.1 Countries have tried to strike a balance in ensuring that citizens have the right of security while maintaining the rights of all human beings while trying to combat terrorism…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Counter terrorism strategy has four main pillars with a framework for a comprehensive response to terrorism at an international level. The pillars are preventing individuals from becoming terrorists, protecting civilians and infrastructure by ensuring there is reduced vulnerability to attacks, disrupting support networks for terrorists, managing and minimizing the consequences that may arise in case of a terror attack. Therefore, this strategy requires working at an international level and despite the fact that these measures are a step forward in combating terrorism, countering terrorism still remains a problem due to lack of clearly defined policies. Public Policy Perspective of Counterterrorism Much counterterrorism policies are expressed in prevention terms and not as a precautionary measure.2 Moreover, counter terrorism efforts will constitute all the necessary actions taken by a government in trying to hinder attacks; hence, its formulated policies should try to reflect the goals and missions of the government. Therefore, having a future measure can consist of actions such as the distinguishing of practices that involve counter terrorism. There are three main aims that governments have during the outlining of a government’s goal in trying to counter the terrorist attacks, which include preventing the escalation of terror attacks, eliminating terrorism and minimizing the damages that might be caused in case of a terror attack. Eliminating terrorist involves destruction of terrorist organizations while actions involved in minimizing damage that may occur in case of an attack include trying to reduce possible future attacks or preventing suicide bombings. The acts of avoiding the spread of both scope of terror attacks and conflicts are key prevention measures for terrorism. In enhancing these policies, most governments preclude organizations from being able to gain certain political achievements such as receiving support from a foreign country. The new legislations that we rely on have legal solutions that rely on judgment placed on judges’ hands.3 The policies should be made based on actions that are accepted in the society. This error requires overspecialization of counterterrorism officers in order to diminish impaired judgments against them.4 One of the democratic measures that a government can take is understanding the various factors that motivate and process radicalization; hence, it is important to acknowledge the fact that acknowledging the difficulty of eliminating a threat is the first step in developing strategies for combating terrorism. International Relation Perspective of Counterterrorism grand Strategy The states have a variety of ways in which they can tackle terrorism on an international system. For instance, EU member states have tried to put measures that will combat terrorism in their EU level. Moreover, governments face a number of challenges within the strategies they use for combating terrorism. The EU coordinators have a setback, which are unable to coordinate complex areas of counterterrorism due to diverse structures.5 For instance, Europe had a surge in the national terrorism when it combined with other groups such as IRA from
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Choose one of the two question on counter terrorism policy Essay”, n.d.)
Choose one of the two question on counter terrorism policy Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1467404-choose-one-of-the-two-question-on-counter
(Choose One of the Two Question on Counter Terrorism Policy Essay)
Choose One of the Two Question on Counter Terrorism Policy Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1467404-choose-one-of-the-two-question-on-counter.
“Choose One of the Two Question on Counter Terrorism Policy Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1467404-choose-one-of-the-two-question-on-counter.
Some academicians and scientists underline that it is impossible to justify the essence of terrorism. In the very essence terrorism is unjust and illegitimate. Nevertheless, this assumption is rather emotional and it is relevant to consider this phenomenon from moral perspective. Thus, there is no moral background for the governments to sponsor terrorists, but they really do that.
The author states that the problem is in the way the counter-terrorism strategy is designed. It relies on three rules. First, Americans never make any deals with terrorists. Second, all terrorists are treated as criminals. Third, the US apply considerable political, economic, and military pressure on the states that are known to be supporting terrorism.
If the citizen was a member of a foreign terrorist group, in a foreign country, or working for a foreign government, they could be considered an unlawful enemy combatant. An example is Jose Padilla, a US citizen charged in Chicago with aiding terrorists in the construction of a 'dirty bomb'.
'As a matter of fact all the three of them have been conferred the Nobel Peace Prize.' (Weiss, pp. 11+, 2002)
Then how can one define terrorism If truth be told, terrorism, a word on everyone's lips, though pretty easy to talk about, but is duly intricate to define.
Are you going to send agents to attend Mosques? Are you going to develop informants among those already living in that population? Are you bounded by any ethical considerations other than the need to prevent needless deaths through terrorism?
Based on the
The author states that California is also the economic hub of America and also houses the biggest number of important buildings, international corporations and film industry. After 9/11, US Patriotic Act was amended and renamed ‘USA Patriot and Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act’. There were introduced surveillance and detention of people.
Terrorism has caused wide ripples in the UK society in the last few decades. The UK society and government was affected initially by the Irish republican terrorism and later by Islamic terrorism. It is often seen that UK tastes its own medicine. Many are of the
A special, top secret court, termed as the FISA was crafted to hear appeals for such justifications. Safeguards were placed in a position to make certain that investigators following criminal issues did not
In reference with today’s terrorism, there is a great difference as many of these nations battle to attain political power. However, there is a great difference in the tactics used by militants during those early days. This is following the growth and advancement in
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Choose one of the two question on counter terrorism policy"
with a personal 20% discount.