Professional Dilemma Name of student Institution Course Tutor Professional Dilemma Introduction Dilemma is a situation that requires making a choice between two equal and in most cases desirable alternatives. Professional dilemma is a situation in which an individual who holds an office and is under specific codes of conduct finds himself in a situation in which he has to make a choice between breaking the professional codes of conduct or accepting an alternative which is of advantage to him (Meese and Ortmeier, 2004)…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Johnson; the cashier identified my local police department badge and concluded that we were police officers. She could not have known our identities if it were not for the badge since we were dressed in civilian clothes. The cashier, Ms. Swansea, told me that I did not have to pay because I was from the local police department. This was a difficult situation because the courtesy would have meant money in my pocket, but due to the police department code of ethics for all personnel, I could not accept the gratuity. I paid the waitress the total amount for the food in a tip so that I would not be breaking company policy regarding gratuity and I did not want to offend the cashier. Analysis of the dilemma This scenario challenged my virtues as a human being and my loyalty to the Ethics that govern the operations of the law enforcement officers. There was a distinct difference between me as a law enforcement officer and the cashier. As a law enforcement officer, I am endowed with powers and authority that come with holding such an office. Such powers can only be necessary in circumstances that the law allows. For instance, as a law enforcement officer, I have the power to interrogate and interview suspects in connection to their alleged crimes (Clark, 1970). I have powers and authority to use legal means to make suspects confess their crimes in order to advance the promotion of Justice to victims of the alleged crime, for instance, applying detention laws to confine suspects in accordance to the law. On the other hand, the cashier has no authority and power in comparison with the law enforcement officers. The cashier, Ms. Swansea, is an employee with the duty of serving clients and receiving cash from them. She has no authority outside her cafe. The ethics in question are: As a law enforcement officer, it is my duty to serve the community and to protect lives and property of innocent people against dishonest acts, and protect the weak against oppression and/or intimidation (Scheb and Scheb, 2011). In the above scenario, the nature of the office I held intimidated the cashier who, thus, offered me the free meal. It is my responsibility as a law enforcement officer to protect the weak against intimidation, and Ms. Swansea as well. If I had accepted the offer, I would have gone against the codes of conduct and ethics that guide law enforcement officers. As law enforcement officers, it is our duty not to permit personal prejudices, personal feelings and political beliefs to influence our decisions and never to accept gratuities due to the office I am holding (H.M.S.O, 1985). Ms. Swansea offered a gratuity to me in the form of not paying for the meal. Had I accepted the offer, I would have betrayed the law enforcement officer’s code of conducts. As law enforcement officers, it is our duty to take the badge of the office as a symbol of faith from the public. It is a public trust that law enforcement officers hold (Scheb and Scheb, 2011). Thus, it is unacceptable for police officers to accept bribes or engage in corruption due to the opportunities that the office they hold presents. In this case, had I
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Professional Workplace Dilemma Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1441288-professional-workplace-dilemma
(Professional Workplace Dilemma Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Professional Workplace Dilemma Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1441288-professional-workplace-dilemma.
Legal Implications of the Case a. Define capacity in Law b. Define Consent in law c. Mental Capacity Act (MCA) i. Background of Mental Capacity Act ii. New Legislation under MCA (2005) iii. Principles of Mental Capacity Act (2005) d. Test of Legal Capacity e.
WORK PLACE ETHICAL DILEMMA Name Instructor’s name Course name Name of Institution Date of Submission Workplace Ethical Dilemma In every working institution or site, there are set rules and regulations that are supposed to guide employees in the line of their duty.
The managers are not expected to determine the medical necessity of patients (Toren & Wagner, 2010). However, case managers are expected to raise questions about the patient treatment and care without showing any bias. The process of striking the right balance between conflicting viewpoints causes them to encounter multiple ethical dilemmas especially in case of unnecessary or duplicative services (Icheku, 2011).
The researcher states that ethical dilemma requires us to weigh our responsibilities, responsibilities to parents, children, our colleagues. The professional knowledge has a vital role in resolving an ethical dilemma. It is very important that we, as educators understand that the Code of Ethics is only useful if it is part of our every practice.
With such fierce competition, there is no reason that any car industry can fall under the category of a perfect competition. The goal of the oligopolies is mainly to attain a strategic edge over their competitor. The competing firms in the European market try to innovate and introduce new features in their respective models rather than reducing the prices to attract buyers.
He showed up intrusively at her house one evening with the excuse that he would give her an extra lesson right before her mid-term exam. My friend's mother accommodated both the student and the teacher in the large drawing room reserved for special occasions.
This theory in modern context doesn't justify the ethical aspect of decision making because the reasons that are "adequate" in the perspective of one person may be "inadequate" in another person's perspective. If Aristotle's theory of Ethics is to be accepted then even the serial killers, terrorists, extortionists and political assassinators would be able to justify their actions based on the "adequate reasoning" which unfortunately has no set standard in the world (Striker, Gisela.
The issue was of great importance, as anyone falling in the lower ratings by this formula was subject to disciplinary action, which may have included termination of employment. I felt I had a responsibility to the people that I had working for me to get the problem corrected and get a system that was fair to all employees.
Clear writing enables the writer to communicate logically and be able to express one’s thoughts without ambiguity. Clarity in writing brings forth the use of proper pronunciation and the right word order. It makes the