Dyadic Interview and Appellations of Concepts - Essay Example

3 Dyadic Interview and Appellations of Concepts Through this assignment, I was able to interact with X, Y and Z through an interview. All of exhibited some form of unique relationships with others. My conversation with them went beyond an interview to some deeper level where they were able to express to me much more. However, X was more reluctant to expose their personal information compared to Y and Z. While talking to Y, I could not get clearly their kind of personality at the initial stages but as the conversation got to some depth, he opened up to me, making their personality to be evident. Interviewing X I opened the interview on a light note endeavoring to know more about X. However, I realized that they are much conserved and the information that they gave was not complete. Despite this, when giving their answers they were cool, calm, and collected. My focus was to know X’s interpersonal relations. This relates to the way they are able to interact with others as well as the extent to which they express their feelings as well as personal reaction to situations. When communicating with others X is very brief and precise, not that he is cautious of his words but at some point, he seems to lack the words. His expressions are not fully complete. However, he demonstrates clarity in the way he communicates. I talked with him concerning his ability to communicate with others. In this, he was very categorical that he finds it difficult to initiate conversations with strangers. Not only is this his predicament, but also maintaining a conversation with a stranger is a daunting task to him. Despite this, when communicating with a person he is conversant with, he pointed out that he is very free and can communicate for long time without any breakdown in communication. I yearned to know more about his interaction with family members and friends. He pointed out to me that have been with a single parent, who is his mother. Therefore, he points out that there are some things that he is not comfortable sharing with the mother. Being the only child, he has no option rather than learn from friends. His scope of friends is relatively small but his friends are very close to him. He demonstrates a deep sense of affection and does not take relationships lightly. He tells me that he has a girlfriend whom they spend a lot of time together. They have been together for the last three years. He tells me that his mother was initially opposed to the idea but she came to appreciate. As the conversation went on, he was easy going and could explain his answers in much more details compared to the initial stages of the interview. I school, he also has very close friends but again, thy are not as many. He lacks interest with people but he tells me that he can never fail to find time for his friends. He smartly controls whatever his deeds but he is not good at limiting his friend. He tells me that he finds it very easy to avoid someone who is not close to them. As I engaged X in this interview, a pattern of communication process was explicit. Initially, I realized his first impression could label him as a non-sociable person, but that was not the case as the conversation proceeded. What made the interview to pick very fast was my ability to engage him in a friendly and calm manner. I ensured that I was composed and tried as much as possible to create a free environment for us to share without any hiccups. Sure enough, he caught my pace very first and was in tune with the conversation. I also realized that at some point I was confused on what to ask next but he became so comfortable that he went ahead to give information that I had not asked for. Interviewing Y I began to interview Y who was so quick to respond to the questions. One main challenge of communicating with her was that she was too lengthy in her responses. I wanted to know about his interpersonal needs. In essence, I tried as much as possible to tilt the interview towards the strengths of her interpersonal interactions. I learnt an important lesson from the interview with Y, that it not enough to use the first impression to figure out the personality of an individual. According to her, Y has a perception of herself as a very outgoing person who likes attending parties and hanging out with friends and relatives whenever an opportunity arises. This interview opened with an analysis of symmetrical and complementary needs in a relationship. She was very swift to talk about different things some of which I did not intend to have included in the interview. I tried to moderate the discussion so that she could get to talk about her relationships. One of the points she had mentioned was about her relationship with her former boyfriend. I wanted to know about the basis of the relationship. From her words, she was attracted to the relationship by trust that she had towards him. Concerning the relationship with her ex-boyfriend, she says that she found herself attracted to the person based on two-year period of time they had been together. At the initial stages of the relationship, they were able to exhibit some of the concepts of trust while some began fading away as the relationship matured hence resulting to the break up. They had become dependent of each other; an aspect that began one year before they decided to start the dating. The two became great friends and shared so much in their relationship. Mutual trust was evident. However, she says that due to her relocation to school, they could not speak as often as they used to. This created a disparity between them hence the trust began dwindling. Having the ability to mingle with people easily and her talkative nature drew her to some other friends. This made her develop some distance with some of her old friends including her ex-boyfriends. Being a party lover, she has developed a mindset that most of the people cheat on their partners especially during parties. This makes her believe that her former boyfriend could have been cheating on her. In addition, she has ever caught him with another woman hence she distrust began coming up since that time. As I interviewed Y, I realized that her relationships are distant, not as close as that of X. However, being very sociable, she knows so many people but there is little that is found between them. Their relationship does not depict any care or concern for one another. She is not good at controlling herself; I could realize that she is easily waved away by situations and circumstances. In addition, her personal relationship with family and relatives is not any different. After the interview, her perception of the relationship that we had created was not any different from the initial one. One of her main strength is in developing relationships. To her, she is capable to approach any individual irrespective of whether they are conserved or are talkative. She is less concerned about developing intimate relationships. Interviewing Z The interview with Z went along very well. One of the major aspects about IPC that I intentionally endeavored to investigate was their self-concept. The issue of self-concept deals with the view an individual has towards themselves. In addition, he shed more light on his interpersonal skills. The interview began by her explaining how he viewed his choice of words. His body language could tell that he was confident of what he was saying. From the start of the interview, Z was articulate and never stammered. Beyond the rest of the other interviewees, Z was very presentable in his flow of thoughts. He was more a bit more diplomatic and demonstrated keenness in explaining what he thought was the right information. He was able to create a good rapport even when I was stranded in attempting to establish a relationship. However, I was able to catch up with him despite being tactical and evasive in his speech. He knew very well that his interpersonal skills were at a good position. Despite this, he was very categorical that he always has an interest of advancing her skills not only to be good but exemplary. As I attempted to evaluate his interpersonal skills, I did not struggle because he presented a perfect scenario. He is very swift in making friends as well as maintaining friendships. However, according to the information I gathered from him, he is very tactical in his approach of choosing friends. He tells me that the family members and relatives view him as the hero of the family. He goes along with almost everybody and his self-concept allows him to customize different relationships. He tells me that his brother wronged him but his approach allowed the brother to come forth and apologize. As a result of this skill people are attracted on his side and rarely does he find himself conflicting with others. In school, Z has a majority of friends and all have a close relationship compared to the other two interviewees. Z also demonstrates trust with the people that he relates with. I found that apart from having peers as friends, Z has quite a good number of friends that are older than him. They all engage in joint activities as well as other opportunities. His interpersonal relationship can be used as an ideal model of relationship. Just like Y his first impression is quite good and the flow of conversation begins from the first word he utters. According to my judgment, he is a good listener who respond to questions in the same manner they have been asked. His listening skills are good enough. Read More