Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend You Position - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
 Name: Instructor: Task: Date: Outline i. Introduction ii. Impacts of the Citizens United’s Decision a. Negative Advertisements b. Increased Spending c. Increased Spending d. Demoralization of the Corporations Members e. Anonymous Contributors f. Enrichment tool iii…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.1% of users find it useful
Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend You Position
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend You Position"

Task: Outline i. Introduction ii. Impacts of the Citizens United’s Decision a. Negative Advertisements b. Increased Spending c. Increased Spending d. Demoralization of the Corporations Members e. Anonymous Contributors f. Enrichment tool iii. Conclusion Take a position for or against the Citizens United Decision and defend you position Introduction Citizens United is a non-governmental organization (NGO) that was insistent on airing a jeopardizing film about Hillary Clinton in the 2008 campaigns. According to Foster (1), this clip was meant to tarnish Hillary’s political image and render her unfit for a political position. This action was in violation of the Federal Laws and hence citizens United got an indictment. It was criminal for individuals or corporations to air election material thirty days prior to voting. In 2010, the Supreme Court was in condemnation of the act of Citizen’s United but gave leeway to corporations to unreservedly fund political promotions. This decision insinuates that corporations can engage in election endorsement but they are supposedly pursuing their hidden interests (Foster 1). I disapprove the Citizen United’s decision since it encourages rich corporations to further their ambitions through electoral endorsements, which does not level the competitive platform for potential candidates. Impacts of the Citizens United’s Decision This has led to involvement of corporations in swaying of voters, which is infringing on democracy since the corporations employ vast resources to advance their objectives. The emergence of Political Action Committees (PAC’s) has led to pollution of the political landscape since they are persistent in damaging the names of opposing candidates just to increase their political advantage. Negative Advertisements According to Foster (1), one of the hazards of the Citizen United decision is to enhance outside participation in politics. Foreign firms can now influence elections through donating staggering amounts to the political contenders. Majority of the justices in the court decision were stating that corporations were representative of a collection of individuals hence are creditable to similar freedoms as an individual. This means they have autonomy to participate in electoral activities (Foster 1). They made a reevaluation of constitutional laws to regulate campaign finances that has led to adversely influencing the elections. It is probable that in the forthcoming years super PAC’s will persist in increasing their funding for their candidates through corporations .the negative advertisements tend to disprove a candidate but rather highlight his policies that will give the electorate substantial information to analyze him. Increased Spending Secondly is the threat of the candidates to administer the interests of the corporations rather than the community (Foster 1). Since the proportions that can be utilized in the campaigns is limitless the corporations can be the invisible force behind significant policies that the candidates propose for implementation. Therefore, the candidates will be under duress to sing to the corporations melodies and further spice it up with a dance routine. This would be injurious to the democratic privileges of the public since their interests will be given second consideration, as the candidates will initially fulfill the corporation’s demands. In addition, these contributions could sway the outcome of voting since money has an ingenious way of manipulating concept or ideas to the financiers bidding. Demoralization of the Corporations Members According to Foster (1), the organizations choice may not accommodate the perception of its members and this is likely to instigate conflict within the firm. The corporation entails of employees, stakeholders and their clients who advocate for their services. The corporation can propose a candidate that is in contradiction with the public and this can alter the community’s perception of the company (Foster 1). This will be to the inconvenience of the firm since their earnings can diminish due to their support of an unfavorable candidate. In addition, employees can encompass differing perspectives on the electoral ambitions of the organization (Foster 1). Some of the workforce can admit their allegiance to opposing candidates and will not appreciate their company’s inclination to a candidate they dislike. This can hamper the efficient productivity of the corporation and additionally lead to conflict. Discontent of the corporation’s involvement can extend to some of the stakeholders who can disapprove this. Since a corporation consists of numerous people and interested persons it is crucial for them to maintain a neutral standpoint in electoral endorsements. Anonymous Contributors The nondisclosure factor of the political sponsors will negatively influence the elections since mysterious funds will be sponsoring the contenders. Non-accountability of these finances is dangerous since substantial sums will be utilized in propagating policies that will determine the subsequent president. The financing sums can be inclusive of monies sketchy individuals requiring the candidate’s assistance in pursuing their objectives (Foster 1). The anonymous contributions can include illegal partisans that are not supportive of the public welfare and their influence on the candidates can be detrimental to the country. Consequently, citizens are able to evaluate candidate’s traits depending on his associations or contributors. Disclosure of the electoral contributors will increase confidence in the American public of the transparency of the candidate and his moral perspective (Foster 1). This will improve the authenticity of the elections and diminish the partisan association of corporations in politics, which only promotes their interest. Enrichment tool The political contenders can utilize the finances of the corporations to affluent individuals to enrich themselves (Foster 1). They candidates can initiate accounts in which the sponsors will forward donations and the spare amounts that remain after the candidate’s pursuance irrespective of the outcome will benefit him. Donations are not contractual union hence it is not obligatory to either party to fulfill their role. The candidates can exploit this exception to evade liability and utilize the funds to accomplish personal goals. Conclusion The Citizen United decision did initiate interference of an innocent political landscape with negative advertisements that are financed by corporations and affluent individuals. In addition, political parties are under coercion to submit to the provisions of the corporation (Foster 1). To encourage a transparent and less pessimistic electoral process that will be devoid of numerous negative advertisements can enhance the national interests. It is essential to acknowledge national target surpass individual interests. Work Cited Foster, Chase. Citizens United and its Discontents: Five Hazards, Five Responses. Harvard Kennedy School Review. 2011.Web. 28 March 2012: Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend Essay”, n.d.)
Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend Essay. Retrieved from
(Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend Essay)
Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend Essay.
“Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend You Position

Analysis of A Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam by Neil Sheehan and consequent attempt to critically evaluate waging of war by the United States against Vietnam

...treachery of the nation against its citizens commenced during the very war time period, however, with progress of time it started taking a more conspicuous form. By analyzing A Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam by Neil Sheehan an attempt will be made to revaluate the actual reasons of America’s declaration of war against Vietnam and consequently with reference to other sources it would be attempted to show that to which extent the socio-cultural dimensions of American life encountered plight of such decision making. Methodology: In order to understand the entire issue as well as to develop the right kind of argument in the context...
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper

Position Paper

...?Position Paper When it comes to business management, the values that I hold most central and important to how I approach work are creativity, innovations, self respect and flexibility. And when it comes to instrumental values, I hold dependability and trust very close to my heart. I highly value these structures I set for myself in terms of my career aspirations and my personal growth. I firmly believe that these are the value structures which are adopted by people in the field which I aspire. I also believe that personal development is the key to improve self-knowledge, identity, talents as well as enhancing the quality of life. Without personal development realizing one’s dreams and aspirations are not possible. I...
4 Pages(1000 words)Term Paper

Position paper

...and women do not arise because they were taught to act/behave differently, but because they ARE different inherently. However, with the role reversal of the 21st century, it has become quite a feat for a couple to make their relationship a success. In this regard a French couple in the 70s who reversed their roles, with the man taking care of the household chores and the woman going out and working (Swerdloff et al. 162-172) are a good example. Despite their role reversal, there were certain old fashioned remnants in their modern marriage. The man was still more authoritarian and the children listened to him more, and the woman felt she needed to take care and nurture the family by cooking for them at...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Position Paper

...seizures on rats, and perform multiple procedures on primates implanting wires in their brains. In addition, animals are forced to inhale toxic fumes, and have corrosive chemicals rubbed onto their skin and eyes, causing open wounds susceptible to infection. Animals are also used as subjects for the testing of side effects and potency of pesticides. As part of this testing they receive well over the lethal amount and inevitably are killed (PETA). Millions of animals worldwide suffer and die every year in cruel chemical, drug, and food tests. They are subjects for biology lessons, dissections, medical training exercises, and curiosity-driven medical experiments. In the United States alone, 1.3 million animals were used...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Take a position on the death penalty

...Position: Abolish death penalty I. Argument a. Conjecture Its imposition is grounded on the principle of general deterrence that intimidating and threatening people with the certainty of death will make them refrain from committing murder. It is thought that by imposing punishment such as death penalty through a clearly written law and sanctioned by the state, people will be deterred from committing crimes which includes murders and their acts will be shaped according to a desired behavior that will produce an efficient society. In the case of murder, it posits that the threat of death penalty will stop people from killing other people. b. Definition and consequence Capital punishment is the imposition...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

Take a position...Are Animals Conscious

...Animal Consciousness Introduction Possession of a feeling of self-definition within the inanimate and animate universe should attract a sense of awareness by an organism. Consciousness denotes the entire control of the feelings and interactions that a being has with the world around it. One of the most important aspects of possession of consciousness is the control of the mind and making decisions that denote a systematic course of action. Knowing about certain information and eventually utilizing calculated mental output to formulate a specific cause of action complement such control of actions in an informed behavior response1. Inanimate things and organisms such as plants have limited capability to demonstrate such...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Position Paper

...Marijuana Should Be Legal For The Sick And Ill" According to IOM report (1999), Marijuana contains certain components which are potentially efficientin relieving pain, nausea as well as vomiting. It is also found to be effective for AIDS associated failure to eat. Research reveals that marijuana could be used as therapeutic agent to relieve pain and sufferings in severely ill cases, as it acts as a medicine when other drugs or medications fail. Smoking marijuana is found to be the most diffident approach as it delivers the drug appropriately and at a faster pace (Should marijuana be a medical option?). Considering the issue, should the use of marijuana as medicine be legalized? The argument has both the pros and cons. Supporters... Should Be...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Take a position

...Athletes and Social Responsibilities The paper below aims at explaining reasons as to why the USA athletes should be involved in social duties. Since athletes are people with social influence, they can be able to mobilize the citizens towards social activities that can be beneficial to the society (smith p319). In addition, the can come up with a project that is aimed at benefiting the less fortunate in the society. It can bring about a social change as well as economic development to those whom they give a service to. It also explains why some of the athletes would choose to step down when it comes to social obligations. This paper concludes by giving an international example of a social responsibility that is conducted...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Rhetorical Analysis of a Controversy

...DC ban on gun carry rights unconstitutional by Emily Miller, Chief investigation reporter as Fox 5 DC. This article was published on Fox News website on July 27th, 2014. This author is in favor of guns and does not favors ban on guns. The author of this article discussed the decision of a judge in Washington DC, who overturned the ban on carrying the guns outside of home. Judge Frederick Scullin Jr. wrote this landmark decree in his ruling in Palmer v. District of Columbia. The author argues that it is the constitutional right of the citizens of the United States to keep gun for self defense. The author mentions her discussion with a famous attorney who was pursuing a lawsuit...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Citizens United

..., the decision on the case of Citizen United was that corporate expenditures in elections did not violate the First Amendment hence politicians can use the corporate money to finance their campaigns. Work Cited Neil Genzlinger. On Electoral Map, the Green Is Obscured ‘Big Sky, Big Money’ on PBS Frontline. Retrieved on 13 March, 2015 from Citizens United What Prompted Citizen United To start with, Citizen United, a people minded NGO, presented a case to supreme court case about election spending in which Political Action Committee (PAC) was the...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Take a Position for or Against the Citizens United Decision and Defend You Position for FREE!

Contact Us