Nobody downloaded yet

An Analysis of the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission Ruling in the Context of Equal Right - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name September 27, 2010 Who Deserves Free Speech? An Analysis of the Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission Ruling in the context of equal rights The unspoken question that underlies debates about the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.8% of users find it useful
An Analysis of the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission Ruling in the Context of Equal Right
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "An Analysis of the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission Ruling in the Context of Equal Right"

Download file to see previous pages By way of brief background, the case takes root in 2008 when a non-profit corporation, Citizens United, released a documentary entitled “Hillary” that was made to target the former Senator who was at the time vying for the nomination of the Democrats. The Supreme Court ruled that electioneering communications fell under the protective ambit of the First Amendment. It therefore overruled the case of Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, which banned the use of treasury money by corporations to campaign for or against particular candidates, and the case of McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, which upheld the restrictions on electioneering communications imposed on corporate expenditures. Many had called it an affirmation of the First Amendment as guaranteed by the Constitution, but many more felt that the Court was privileging corporate interests and was hijacking the integrity of the elections. There has also been an unfortunate tendency to label those who support Citizens United as conservatives and those who oppose it as more progressive. In this paper, I argue that the decision was in fact an affirmation of free speech and was in fact a celebration of civil liberties. I also argue that the opposite outcome would in the long run have more deleterious effects on the First Amendment. ...
h comes from a corporation.” It also states that “Because speech is an essential mechanism of democracy—it is the means to hold officials accountable to the people—political speech must prevail against laws that would suppress it by design or inadvertence.” It then proceeded to say that corporations and human beings both have a right to free speech that the government is dutybound to protect. Said Justice Kennedy, “Distinguishing wealthy individuals from corporations based on the latter’s special advantages of, e.g., limited liability, does not suffice to allow laws prohibiting speech.” Another point that was made by the decision was that deciding against Citizens United would render other institutions vulnerable censorship. The majority opinion reminds us that newspapers are corporations as well, and thus they may well be gagged from political communication if the Citizens case was decided in the opposite way. This does not bode well for the future of media and journalism. Indeed, their freedom must be zealously guarded as it constitutes a bedrock of our democracy. Opponents of the decision, however, are sceptical that the protection of free speech is indeed the agenda of the decision – noting that historically, corporate interests have often trumped public interest, and wondering if this is yet another example of the unfortunate pattern. “If the ban is struck down”, says Cohen (2009) corporations may soon be writing large checks to the same elected officials whom they are asking to give them bailouts or to remove health-and-safety regulations from their factories or to insert customized loopholes into the tax code.” Fears have been raised that the decision will see an emergence of corporate lobbying in even grander scale than present: ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“An Analysis of the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission Essay”, n.d.)
An Analysis of the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission Essay. Retrieved from
(An Analysis of the Citizens United Vs Federal Election Commission Essay)
An Analysis of the Citizens United Vs Federal Election Commission Essay.
“An Analysis of the Citizens United Vs Federal Election Commission Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF An Analysis of the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission Ruling in the Context of Equal Right

Womens Right (Equal Right Amendment)

...that the Equal Rights Amendment of the United States Constitution has confronted throughout the years. The aim of this scholarly treatise is not only to provide pertinent information regarding the women rights advocacy but also to demonstrate insightful ideas and recommendations for the now and the future. Historical Background In 1848, the first-ever Women’s Rights Convention was held in Seneca Falls, New York. Abolitionists Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott spearheaded the two-day meeting of over 300 people who rallied for justice and equality for women who were institutionally restricted from the rights and...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Equal Employment Oportunity Commission

.... Employment Relations Today, 28(2), 59-62. 3. Choate (2009), History/Overview of EEOC's Mediation Program. Washington D.C.: The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC. 4. Cohen (2009), Reflections of an EEOC mediator. Employment Rights Quarterly, 1(1), 25-30. 5. Doan (2009), How to conduct sexual harassment training effectively. Equal Opportunities International, 16(5/7), 29-33 6. Henneman (2008), After high court ruling, firms may want to take long look at anti-harassment strategies. Workforce Management, 87(15), 35-38. 7. Johnston (2008), EEOC universal agreements to mediate—Peer pressure or strategic move? Helms Mulliss Wicker 8. Keppler...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

...Topic: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). What is the EEOC? Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a federal agency that enforces administrative and judicial laws for civil rights to facilitate equal opportunity in employment through education and technical assistance. As per EEO laws, an employer is prohibited from discriminating current or potential employees at workplace (Heathfield, 2011). EEOC is under mandatory obligation to monitor compliance and enforcement of Title VII under Civil Rights Act, 1964 along with other federal civil rights...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

United States Presidential Election

...between the races that has been neglected for centuries. Obama is the only candidate that can restore our global reputation as a peace loving country built upon the ideals of freedom and dignity. Barak Obama is the only candidate that has a vision of America where everyone has an equal opportunity, whether poor, or old, or handicapped by the status quo of the white power structure. Obama's years of experience working for the socio-economic classes that needed it most has given him the temperament and judgment required of this high office. The presidential election of 2008 will be a pivotal event in US history. The voters can decide to stay on the path of indecision and neglect, or they can decide that it...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Current Australian Federal Election Campaign

...Running Head: CURRENT AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN Current Australian Federal Election Campaign of Institution] Current Australian Federal Election Campaign Introduction If we analyze then we come to know that the 2007 general election for the Parliament of Australia is predictable to take place among late month of October to near the beginning month of December, with some days' notice. According to the expert analysis the opposition centre-left Australian Labor Party, at present led by Kevin Rudd and deputy manager Julia Gillard, will be the major contestant to the current...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Federal Election Commission 558 U.S

...Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310 Rule of law The federal law, as amended by §203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) disallows both “corporations and unions” in utilizing “their general treasury funds” to independently spend for speech considered as an “electioneering communication” or for a speech that explicitly supports “the election or defeat of a candidate”( 2 U. S. C. §441b). Electioneering communication has been defined as “any broadcast, cable, or satellite communication” referring “to a clearly identified candidate for Federal office”...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Secular vs. Religious Ruling

...Secular vs. Religious Ruling “We ordained therein for them: Life for life, eye for eye, nose for nose, ear for ear, tooth for tooth, and wounds equal for equal." (Quran [Authorized English Version], Al-Maeda.5.45) “An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind” Mahatma Gandhi The East and West are very different worlds. So very diverse it is hard to believe they both share the same globe. How do these two worlds perceive and implement Justice? How does one know what is right and what is wrong? And finally, who decides how to reward or punish people? There are many ways to answer these questions. These answers change depending on who you are, where you...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Equal Rights vs. Economic Restructuring

... Teacher The cases cited that women could not own a property, had no legal rights to their wages, discouraged to work under the pain of being fired or forced resignation, working while doing domestic work may be an exaggeration today in the United States because it is no longer the case of most women but this illustrates the inequality that women had to bear and to some extent, are still facing today. There are some advocates on how to address this inequality such as Goldman’s contraception and economic independence and Kollontai’s suggestion that the state should provide childcare support to the women to alleviate their hardship and allow them to pursue their professional careers. I particularly agree with Kollontai’s assertion... that...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Citizens United

...Citizens United What Prompted Citizen United To start with, Citizen United, a people minded NGO, presented a case to supreme court case about election spending in which Political Action Committee (PAC) was the petitioner. The source of political campaign money was a big concern for many Americans as represented by Citizens United. However, according to the documentary “Big sky, Big Money” Bopp asserts that people direct funding by influential people and corporations has been a ‘corrupting’ problem in America’s past (Neil, 2015). However, Citizen United,...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Federal vs State Law

...of some of the state laws were eventually put to light as seen in the case of Adams. Thus, the need to revise such laws that predetermined a suspect’s innocence or guilt was raised. Van Orden v. Perry Thomas Van Orden took Texas to the federal district court on the grounds that the Ten Commandments monument at the state capitol building an unconstitutional in that it violated the First Amendment's establishment clause (Unger 34). According to Orden, the law prohibited the government from passing laws that respected religious establishment. The district court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals all ruled against Orden. Their argument was the same and stated that the monument had a secular role and was...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic An Analysis of the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission Ruling in the Context of Equal Right for FREE!

Contact Us