This essay stresses that realism theory endeavours to understand world the way it is, tackling the dynamics of power and interest that states hold in their interaction with other states in order to control global politics. Realism is seen as a theory that advocates for limited cooperation between countries. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Realisms Depiction of International Relations"
Download file to see previous pages
Therefore, in entering any agreement with any country, a state is always aware of the likelihood of cheating and the potential comparative gain that might result from the arrangement (Simpson 2001). Due this fear, courtiers must act to safeguard their interest so that in case of partners’ noncompliance with the bilateral or multilateral agreement, the state is not exposed to economic or security risks (Grieco 1999). Such a move should not translate into limiting cooperation with other states, but as a measure that will protect the country from exploitation by its partners. Realism has also developed to accommodate new trends that characterize international relations. Economic globalization has made it a must for cooperation as opposed to isolation of country from outside influence. Industrialized countries have been able to reap a lot of benefit due to this improved cooperation with other states (Jackson & Sorensen 2007). Such cooperation has become apparent especially with countries like USA, which traditional follows the realist ideology to increase its interaction with others for greater influence and economic gains. Although globalization has made cooperation among countries inevitable, different countries do not trade on the same platform. Some countries benefit more than the other does in any international agreement. Since every country is serving its interest in the agreement, some countries are bound to gain more than the others do, as is mostly the case when developed countries trade with third world countries. Developed countries use their superior economic and technological power to get cheap raw material from developing countries and then sale the processed...
This essay stresses that international organization presented by liberal institutionalism cannot stop countries from acting according to the balance of power system, calculating how each of their moves affects their relative position in the in global arena where stiff completion is the order of the day. Realists argue that international institutions cannot provide a muscular and timely response to aggression by power hungry states. A good example of this is the Syrian case where the government has taken part in the bombing of civilian habitats killing many yet the international institutions could not move in to stop the killing. Another key example of failure for liberal institutionalism to depict international relations is the failure of international institutions to act on the threat that North Korea’s accumulation of nuclear energy post to international security. Therefore, countries protect their interests by trusting in their own power and not on an international authority
This paper makes a conlusion that international relations are guided by the need of states to get the best out of its interactions with other states. To achieve this, states will seek to protect their economic interests and further their influence in the international politics. The failure of international institutions to be tough on aggressive states has increased the need for countries to act in their best interest due to the stiff competition in international politics and economy. Only the established balance of power can dictate how far a state can advance its interests.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Table of Contents 1 Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Thesis Statement 3 Expansive Detail of the Event 4 Arguments 5 Realist Theory 5 Liberal theory 7 Conclusion 9 References 10 11 Introduction International relations can be defined as an expanded antagonism between the realist, liberal and radical traditions.
To better appreciate the international approaches taken by countries in the third and second worlds, the author analyzes the various international relations theories that exist. In the constructivist’s view, the world is basically a ‘social construct’, which is supported by an in-depth comprehension of international structure.
Trade, works of art, sports, and armed conflicts are among the things that fuel international relations. The armed expeditions were a normal occurrence in the face of the earth by the year 1900 because every country organized community/country wanted to express its capability through waging of wars that led to lose of many lives although the same is still happening today.
The modern discipline of international relations takes into account a diverse range of related disciplines that can affect the bilateral relations between two states, for example economics, history and culture. Policy making by the USA vis-a-vis a Middle Eastern nation like Egypt would take into account all of the above factors and disciplines while studying the present scenario on the ground and then framing a policy that would serve the interests of both nations.
It achieves this by enforcing disproportionate specialisation on the periphery, pushing it towards ‘extraversion’ or export and ‘monetarisation’ or cash crops (Halevy 1981, 67). This manipulation of the customary livelihood or mode of production results in the expulsion of a portion of the population from the territory, forcing them towards hard or manual labour but without providing jobs for them.
There are a number of different approaches that the United States could pursue in dealing with the menace presented by Iran. There are a number of approaches based on different international relations theories. In the first case, Washington could act in a realist manner.
The discussions relating to the currency war cannot but take on a heavy slant in economics and economic policy, even as one cannot argue that trade is a major force that knits or destroys relationships among nations, something that has been discussed in much detail in many theoretical discussions in international relations.
Hence, it becomes highly important to understand International Relations. International Relations is the study of the interaction between the various actors that take part in international politics which includes the countries, states, non-government organizations, international organizations, local governments, bureaucrats and individuals.
t govern the international relations between sovereign states and other institutional subjects of international law such as the United Nations and the African Union (formerly O.A.U). (The nature of international law) Rules of international law cover almost every facet of
These critics trace the impotence of the United Nations to absence of a centralized IR government that it has failed to create.
The critics are, no doubt, right in their own way; but so are those who still pin their hopes on the United Nations to ensure a
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Realisms Depiction of International Relations"
with a personal 20% discount.