Download file to see previous pages...
During this period, Cold War revolutionized global approaches to war. Military growth and development became the subject of the day, especially in both Eastern and Western blocs. High tension also became evident as United States and the Soviet Union embarked on a bid to arm themselves with nuclear weapons.
A significant rise in the production of nuclear weapons was anticipated following the end of World War II. Both Eastern and Western blocs feared the emergence of yet another world war as time went by. This fear accelerated arming in both United States and the Soviet Union. These two countries had taken their respective positions as global superpowers, an aspect that fuelled the emergence of Cold War. Over the years, the two countries would accumulate weapons of mass destruction without necessarily engaging in physical war-like attacks.
Cold War was a significant factor in shaping war trends across the globe. The Soviet Union consolidated the Eastern bloc while the United States of America did the same on the Western bloc. During this time, no fighting of significant scale was reported. In other words, the war was literally cold even though it lasted for decades. Based on these observations, the Cold War exhibited critical dynamics, most of which were subject to the influence of nuclear weapons.
Weapons of mass destruction undoubtedly come with consequences that do not only affect the attacked party, but also the attacker. Atomic energy that is out of control carries devastating and catastrophic implications. With two nuclear-armed nations in a standoff, it was evident that the victims would comprise of more than just the warring parties would. In fact, memories of World War II reveal just how destructive atomic bombs and nuclear weapons are. In the context of war, a repeat of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attack was an experience that warring nations would rather avoid (Miller,
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Stories of war are part of human history. Plato claimed in The Republic that the origin of war is lodged on the notion that there is an existing need for the community to extend its territory, to feed its citizen, defend honor or to right a wrong.
As there has been increasing desire within the international community for nuclear disarmament, the argument has persisted whether the creation of such a weapon actually prevents conventional war. Paul, et al (2009) explains that most countries, including the UN Security Councils five permanent members have repeatedly committed themselves in law and word to the pursuit of nuclear disarmament in good faith in a bid to eliminate nuclear weapons altogether.
These two incidents led to important things that changed the world in totality. First of all, the allied powers who defeated the Japanese and Nazi forces sought to create a new world order that would preserve human rights and prevent the killing of innocent people in the future2 The second feature of the Post-World War II period was the need to control weapons of mass destruction to prevent serious civilian deaths and casualties3.
From then onwards, a majority of the most powerful states in the world sought and developed these weapons for defending themselves against any possible aggression by their rivals. The use of these weapons in Japan had come to show the destructive and devastating power of these weapons, and for this reason, no other country has ever attempted to use them in any aggressive way against its enemies.
The cold war which was a rather very prolonged battle of a myriad of threats, posturing and wills between the Capitalistic United States and the Communist Soviet Union, was seen to follow soon after the World War II. By the year 1943, the eventual outcome of the cold war was clear to all the Germany led countries.
Nuclear weapons. Some nations own or possess nuclear weapons based on the legitimacy they place upon themselves, where they are termed as being a source of security. However, many other reasons for which these weapons are in use or exist, which form the base of this essay.
Critic of nuclear proliferation argued that nuclear weapons endanger the existence of international peace and the welfare of the world. On the other hand, supporters of nuclear proliferation argue that nuclear weapons provide a deterrent against aggression from enemy countries.
Today, five nations – the U.S., United Kingdom, Russia, China and France – are officially recognised as possessing nuclear weapons. Pakistan and India have tested nuclear weapons and it is not known if Israel possesses nuclear weapon capability. Recently,
Despite their collaboration to defeat a common enemy, Japan, their engagement in the war, just masked the contempt they had for each other. Economic competition and political conflict characterized the Cold War, even
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic How did nuclear weapons affect the dynamics of the Cold War for FREE!