UN security council ambassador policy paper - Essay Example

UN Security Council Thailand ambassador policy paper As we gather in this place, the world is watching as and expects that a clear frame work is developed that will seek to spur the growth and development of the countries we belong. Thailand is a country that is proud to be a member of this great organization and so are its development partners. As the country seeks to grow further and move from one level to the other, the country has to look forward for support from partner countries and global and regional development partners.

The security of the country will howver remains to be the greatest pillar on which this great nation is founded. This is the reason as to why Thailand takes great exception in seeking for the support of the Security Council in dealing with the long dawn conflict that has faced the country in the recent past in the Pantani region. The United Nation Security Council has the obligation of promoting peaceful existence of nations and societies across the globe. This is through development of clear policy and initiatives that are meant to aide member countries of the UN in achieving this objective.

The council’s obligation is embed on the fact that security lapse on a given country may not be a threat t that country alone but also a problem that, may affect the whole world. This has come out as part of the lessons that were learnt from the two great wars, the World War I and II and the failure of the League of Nations to fully address this fundamental issue. The conflict in the Pantani region of southern Thailand has a long history and separatist violence has occurred for decades (if not centuries), but the current conflict flared in the early 2000s.

This conflict went a notch higher when the Pantani United Liberation Organization (PULO) and other related groups escalated their armed struggle for independence. The concentration of this struggle was concentrated in the Malay-Muslim dominated provinces in southern Thailand. Consequently, thousands of innocent people have lost their lives and many others have been turned into internally displaced thousands more. In 2012 alone, more than 500 people were killed. There is a great justification as to why the conflict or the insurgency in the Patani region should be taken up by the Security Council.

By seeking the intervention of the Security Council, the Thai government is not in any way alluding that it has totally failed in addressing the issue. This initiative is as a result of the nature of the conflict. Initially, the conflict was thought to be purely local, however, as time went by, this insurgency been systematically hijacked by outside extremists to avail wider transnational Islamist designs in Southeast Asia. Consequently, this conflict has conflict gone beyond control to the level that it warrants international response.

Whereas the Thai Government has sought to deal with the matter locally, intrusion of extremist groups has escalated the violence between the militia groups and the police. The loss of thousands of people in the conflict cannot be underestimated as it points to a situation that might easily get out of hand if not well addressed in time. Thailand would, through this proposition seek to have a comprehensive response to the Pantani conflict so as to facilitate speedy recovery and return to normalcy.

In this respect, a multidimensional response would be very necessary for handling of the conflict. This should be threefold in the form of, humanitarian assistance, development aid, and/or peace management operations. The humanitarian assistance is necessary, given the large numbers of causalities and victims that have been directly and indirectly affected by the conflict. Development aid would on the other hand be necessary for purposes of reconstruction of the livelihoods of those that have been affected by this long-drawn conflict.

Peace management operations would on the other hand aid in a top to the escalation violence in the region, which will be very necessary for paving way for other interventions. In respect to the above propositions, there are certain specific initiatives that may be necessary for affecting these demands. These include; Sending UN backed troops to the volatile region. A total of 10,000 troops would be enough to facilitate speedy disarmament and peace initiatives. Facilitation of humanitarian aid in the region.

A total of $45 million would be enough to assist the victims in reconstruction Humanitarian aid sanctioned by the UNHCR and other relevant UN bodies that will assist victims get back to their feet and operate. This would target mostly the displaced persons through provision of food, shelter and clothing products. A total of about $1.5 million would be sufficient. In seeking to have these propositions passed, the Thai government would like to greatly emphasize the need for peace on the southern parts of the country.

This cannot be achieved without the support of core members of the United Nations Security council. This is a great reason as to why Thai government would humbly request the veto powers of the Security Council including China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States to stand by these propositions and have it accepted for purposes of peace and stability in the region. This is in recognition that any attempt by any member with veto power to turn down this proposition would scuttle the whole process and make a resolution on the same not to be adopted.

Notwithstanding the veto powers of these core states, Thailand has gone beyond this category to lobby for more members of the Security Council to help pass this resolution and implement the propositions raised. Others members include; Azerbaijan, Argentina, Australia, Morocco, Pakistan, Luxembourg, Rwanda and Togo. In respect to the proposed resolution, the UN Security Council resolution paper would be as drafted below: Department of Public Information • News and Media Division • Bangkok Security Council 6932nd Meeting* (AM) Security Council Resolute to Take up Peace and Reconstruction Initiatives in Southern Thailand, in Recognition of the Conflict in The Pantani Region The Security Council resolute to: 1.

Sending UN backed troops to the volatile region. A total of 10,000 troops would be enough to facilitate speedy disarmament and peace initiatives. 2. Facilitation of humanitarian aid in the region. A total of $45 million would be enough to assist the victims in reconstruction 3. Humanitarian aid sanctioned by the UNHCR and other relevant UN bodies that will assist victims get back to their feet and operate. This would target mostly the displaced persons through provision of food, shelter and clothing products.

A total of about $1.5 million would be sufficient. 4. Make follow up and submit a report on review of the situation in the Pantani region of Southern Thailand when as may be reasonable but not beyond eight months after effecting this resolution Yours sincerely, Hans Blix (Signed) Mohamed El Baradei Executive Chairman Director General United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission Works Cited Stuart Nagel, Policymaking and peace: a multinational anthology, New York, NY: Lexington Books, 2003 Stephen Cambone, A new structure for national security policy planning, California, CA: CSIS, 1998 Tan-Mullins, May Hansen, Armed Conflict and Resolutions in Southern Thailand, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, ISSN 0004-5608, 12/2009, Volume 99, Issue 5, pp.

922 – 931 Peter Janssen, Thailand's southern conflict claims 4,390 lives since 2004, McClatchy - Tribune Business News, 10/17/2010 Jonathan Strand David Rapkin, Weighted Voting in the United Nations Security Council: A Simulation, Simulation & Gaming, 12/2011, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp. 772 - 802