The Plan of Ayala in light of the Declaration of the Rights of Man The Declaration of the Rights of Man was approved by the National Assembly of France on the year 1789. Its creation was propelled by the French people thinking that the sole cause of public calamities, corruption of governments, and economic disdain is the ignorance or the wrong use of the rights of man…
Download file to see previous pages...
This is because “one’s right ends when another’s right begins”. Aside from that, the Declaration of the Rights of Man was perpetrated to curb the abuse of power of the legislative and executive powers of those that are in position which was one of the strongest causes of chaos and disillusionment among societies. The declaration is supposed to provide utmost transparency of the government’s responsibility to its people which indeed gave way to the close scrutiny of those in power’s action at any moment by all political institutions, thus, preventing contestations of principles and exercising power that only appeals to a chosen few. Some of the provisions of the Declaration of the Rights of Man would be gender equality, liberty without encroaching on the rights of others, right to property, security, resistance to oppression, sovereignty of the nation, laws based on the general will and etc. (Declaration of the Rights of Man, 1789). There are a lot of considerations of the Plan de Ayala in the light of the Declaration of the Rights of Man. First of all, Plan de Ayala was a movement that was surged because of the desire and need to end the tyranny and be able to redeem Mexico and its people from dictatorships. What was happening at this time was that the Mexican people who were led by Don Francisco I. Madero are now taking the law in their hands as the government or any political institution which is supposed to make sure the rights of man is served is already controlled by a single party which is headed by Madero. Aside from that, what rightly belongs to the people are not being served and moral laws are being crossed. To provide concise examples of Madero’s abuse, he clearly went against his commitment to push for revolution which he gloriously initiated to prosper the land. This is because of the fact that he gave in to corruption that defeats the purpose of the National Sovereignty and keeps it out of the equation; the numerous jailing and killings of revolutionary elements who helped him bag his presidency so all the power would be centered to him alone; the brute force done towards people who question or demand from him the fulfillment of the promises of the revolution, these people whom he called rebels to cover up to his brutality; and forcing more people into an alliance with him to form a new dictatorship where only their specific interests and rights are served (Womack, J., 1969). Thus, because of all the corruption of not only the people but also of the government and the other political institutions, the people of Mexico took initiative to solve anarchy and tyranny by seeking help from the remaining pro-Revolution chief justices to lead the movement. Aside from overthrowing Madero and Porfiro Diaz, an ally, they seek to regain what is rightful to each Mexican such as giving back the fields, timber, and water usurped by the landlords from citizens who actually have the titles to these corresponding properties. However for the landlords who do not have documents to support their claim of property, the goods will still be confiscated from the corrupt leaders and will be nationalized - to be given to the victims of war, pensions for widows and orphans etc. (Womack, J., 1969). This course of act, overthrowing their leader is a right they can demand for as it is
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Consider the Plan of Ayala in light of the Declaration of the Rights Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/history/1460555-consider-the-plan-of-ayala-in-light-of-the
(Consider the Plan of Ayala in Light of the Declaration of the Rights Essay)
“Consider the Plan of Ayala in Light of the Declaration of the Rights Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1460555-consider-the-plan-of-ayala-in-light-of-the.
Psychoanalysis is based largely upon the work and investigation of Sigmund Freud who held that unacceptable thoughts of childhood were relegated to the unconscious mind but continue to influence a person’s thoughts, emotional states and hence the behavior.
(un.org) It was drafted by a panel including not only representatives of Western democracies but also the USSR, and lead by Eleanor Roosevelt, widow of the US wartime president. Although there were 8 abstentions, there were no dissenters among the member states supporting the UDHR.
This is one of the purposes of laws and regulations—to humanize and dignify persons. This paper will discuss the Universal Declaration of Human Rights1 and its implications to human rights violation around the world but citing one specific case as example.
It include covering issues on human rights, control of government property, and other civil rights of Ottoman citizens. The contents of the document include: The reason for the establishment and existence of the constitution. How the nation controls the naming and the number of senators.
Without the presence of the enzymes, the catalysis of the chemical reactions would not have been possible, since they serve as the biological catalysts in the reactions (Bettelheim et al, 2008, p.614). The metabolic reactions are essential in the body since they allow the human bodies to survive.
With the global onslaught of war, poverty, violence against women and children, AIDS, and racial discrimination, protecting human rights seems to be a daunting and elusive task for the United Nations. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is the pioneering document of modern human rights doctrine.
In this context, according to R.K.M. Smith (2005, p.240), ‘the deprivation of a person’s liberty can only be acceptable when there are serious reasons that impose the detention as the only suitable measure’. However, it seems that
It is the content of these laws that has been the subject of widespread critic, especially by feminists, in that the term ‘man’ has been used selectively to exalt the rights of men folk above those of the women folk.
However, rather than addressing this issue head on, the founders opted to outright ignore the institution of slavery with respect to the rights of man that were delineated within the Declaration of Independence (Ferling 1). This