U.S Policies towards Iran Name Institution Tutor Date U.S Policies towards Iran Economic sanctions have been in use as a tool of foreign policy for over 2,500 years. Sanctions are tools used by governments to influence other nations to adopt their policies…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
The U.S policy against Iran reached its climax in 2005 when Ahmadinejad won the presidency. The U.S government dispatched battle ships to the Persian Gulf, seized Iranian agents in Iraq, and intensified its campaign to constraint Iranian access to the international economy. The criticism of Tehran by Washington has spilled over to the streets and into learning institutions. Academic experts, the press, and leaders of several institutions in America have differing explanations for the causes and effects of these sanctions, but the government is strategizing on how to increase pressure on Iran. The events of 11th September 2001 changed the relationship between the U.S and the Middle East. The Iranian response to the terror attack was viewed as sympathetic. The Iranian government has also been criticized for being sympathetic to Afghan Taliban forces. During the Afghanistan war, Iranians provided the coalition forces with intelligence and did not intervene directly to end the war. This intensified the hostility between Iran and the Bush Administration. Iran has also continuously supported the Palestine government in its conflict with Israel. The U.S government makes policies against Iran in order to reduce the likelihood of war between Israel and Iran. Iran has the power to exploit the changing Arab environment in the Middle East, which would cause instability in the region. The sanctions imposed on Iran by Washington aim at polarizing the Iranian campaign to ensure stability in the region (Kegley and Raymond, 2012). The main source of hostility between U.S and Iran has been the participation of the Iranian in nuclear weapons projects. Iran’s interest in nuclear activities dates back to the 1950’s, and the country reasserted its nuclear program after the end of the Iran-Iraq war in 1988. This became a great concern for the U.S government that imposed the first sanctions in the 1990s. The U.S government accuses Iran of pursuing a uranium enrichment program. Most of the research activities are done on weapons and are conducted in military bases (Wright, 2007). This has convinced the U.S government that the Iranians are developing nuclear weapons, which pose great danger to the national security of America. Arab uprising in the Middle East and the hostile relations between Israel and Iran could become disastrous if Iran develops nuclear weapons. The U.S government has imposed economic sanctions to limit funding to the Iranian nuclear projects. Iran fiercely opposes several current long-term objectives of NATO, which is led by USA. The Iranian government promotes a governance system that contradicts the interests of NATO. Iran opposes systematic use of torture, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and peaceful coexistence in the international system (Parsi, 2007). NATO and the U.S have to seek influence over Iran in order to pursue their objectives without resistance. Iran remains disparated to the peace progression in the Middle East that is led by USA. The NATO alliance aims at establishing a long-term peace deal between Israel and its Arab neighbors. NATO has to protect Turkey and Norway, who are its member states. Iran protects and provides the Kurdish fighters in Turkey with weapons and training camps. The U.S government and NATO members consider Iran as a safe territory for Turkish fighters who have caused instability and terrorism in the country (Taylor, 2010). The sanctions and policies imposed by America on Iran have eroded the possibility of
However, in 1953, a coup occurred against Iran’s democratically elected prime minister supported by both the United States and the United Kingdom. In 1979, there was also a revolution against Iran’s hereditary ruler (the Shah) and the US was purported to be involved.
For example, his gangsters schemed to molest Israel using a group of activists from Palestine instead of employing a tank army. Unidentified human wag of Arab protestors came close to the border wire, and Israel’s border troops drove them off. However, that was just a misinformation aimed at inflaming nationalists and sectarian passions.
Economic sanction is a penalty charged by one country on another as a form of trade regulative measure restricting flow of financial transactions between the national participants of the two countries. When the economic stability and prosperity depends largely on the global positioning of an economy, international economic sanctions are impactful.
The United States of America is a highly influential country in the world and has the power to overwhelm the other countries by interfering into their matters and imposing the U.S. will on them with the idea that America thinks the best for all. These actions are supported by its global reach which is backed by around an economy of $14 trillion which is a giant economy which equals to approximately one-fourth of total world’s GDP; an overpowering set of arsenal of the most deadliest weapon systems with a defense budget of more than $700 billion, which accounts for roughly about 40% of the rest of the world’s military expenditure.
It is now 30 years since the United State of America adopted the policy of dual containment of Iran and Iraq. When did the policy of containment came into being? What is its destiny? Much has been said about policy of dual containment, especially in Iraq.
The UN charter stipulates clearly the procedures that should be followed by a country to perpetrate coercion or violence to another state. The UN charter is the only legitimate basis that a country can use to attack another sovereign state since it has been reached through consensus by the member states forming the United Nations.
This is necessary to understand the genuineness of the policies of United States. The present essay is intended to analyze the policies of US for Iraq, which finally resulted in the Invasion. The consequences of the war also would be analyzed based on these policies for interpreting the invasion based on these policies.
The author states that the problem is also associated with increased violence and insurgency in this region and instability in Pakistan. Moreover, it has to large extent increased terrorism activities across the globe. The prevailing situation has contributed to increased Taliban activities against NATO.
Oren admits that the America’s failure to be clear and honest about its own motives, as much as its serial failure to interpret the Middle East as often befuddled relations with the region (Oren,pp.341).
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"US Policy Towards Iran"
with a personal 20% discount.