Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1665701-literacy-education
https://studentshare.org/english/1665701-literacy-education.
Annotated Bibliography Abernathy, Scott Franklin. No Child Left behind and the Public Schools. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2007. Print.This book is an incisive study in which the author lays bare the achievements and flops of the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act, which is one of the most promising and controversial programmes in the history of education. While its challengers argue that it is financially underfed, the supporters of NCLB view it as a move likely to create a levelled playground for advantaged and disadvantaged students (2).
Abernathy argues that policymakers must first consider the relevance and superiority of a child’s education instead of making an assumption that tests effectively reflect on the goodness of an education system.Hayes, William. No Child Left Behind: Past, Present, and Future. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2008. Print. The objective of the No Child Left Behind Act has been received with mixed feeling among the American society. While some support the legislation, others have vehemently opposed it as regards its impacts on schools.
According to the author of this book, many people have narrow comprehension of the content and scope of the NCLB. This book lays a platform for better understanding of the contents and operation of the NCLB. No Child Left Behind’s main objective is “to improve the reading level of American students” (41).Jamison, Eliot A., and Dean T. Jamison. The Effects of Education Quality on Income Growth and Mortality Decline. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2006. Print.In this book, the authors present a research analysis including several countries to demonstrate and justify that higher education levels promotes national income growth.
In their bid to ascertain if education quality improves per capita income, they use the data they obtained from each country. According to the authors, high quality education results into low child mortality rate. The authors argue that education quality significantly influences the number of years one stays in school in open economies compared with closed economies.Works CitedAbernathy, Scott Franklin. No Child Left behind and the Public Schools. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan, 2007. Print.Hayes, William.
No Child Left Behind: Past, Present, and Future. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education, 2008. Print. Jamison, Eliot A., and Dean T. Jamison. The Effects of Education Quality on Income Growth and Mortality Decline. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2006. Print.
Read More