Intuition, Sensing, Thinking, and Perception Type - Essay Example

a. My MBTI type is ISTP, which stands for Intuition, Sensing, Thinking, and Perception. It is a personality type that is characterized by being a manof few words and reserved. A person with this personality type are best at working on their own at their own pace of time without relying on the help of other people. ISTPs are similar to INTJs in that both personality types boast independence; nevertheless, ISTPs are more fiercely independent. ISTPs are hands-on, tangible, grounded, and are very much leaning on the present that is why they are oftentimes viewed as having a cool demeanor (Myers & McCaulley, 1985). As for me, I am fairly convinced that I have an ISTP personality type considering the fact that my decisions are heavily based on objective thinking rather than subjective thinking or some sorts of intuitions or feelings – for this reason, I am dealing with my colleagues, friends or acquaintances in a much more impersonal manner. I am also very logical and driven by certain level of analysis. I do not run out of activities because of my spontaneous lifestyle. Oftentimes, I am very flexible and can deal perfectly with immediate changes. I can adapt easily to changing situations without the help of other people. My independence can be described by my views of having a companion in doing a task: I believe that having to do something with someone else is just a waste of time. I think that working with a companion or in groups is not effective and does not bring efficient results because time and focus are divided; the consensus that you have to come up with precludes the possibility of arriving at an ideal solution because when there are two or more heads working on the task, you all have to agree with a neutral decision, which is not necessarily what you want individually. Therefore, participative management will never work for me – having to participate in group discussions or crowd sourcing is a painstaking activity to do. I am more of action than visualization or planning – I would rather work on the task rather than plan or spend more time on planning and organization, although they are also important in the process. I am pedantic and would love to do things over and over again until I achieve the result that I think is best. In terms of my communication style, I am more reserved and quiet. I do not really engage in group discussions. Since having a conversation is inevitable in a workplace setting, I therefore prefer to hear or see concrete information rather than abstract ones – this is my principle because I believe that it is more important to bring results than to plan for potential results. Because of this, I do not really plan my tasks in advance because I prefer to keep my options open. My content of my statements are often logical and precise because I want everything to be as workable as possible. b. My colleague is an INTJ, which stands for Introversion, Intuition, Thinking, and Judgment. People with this personality type also tend to be quiet and reserved. INTJ is very similar to ISTP and they are oftentimes very hard to differentiate. Although, INTJ are not as objective and as analytical and as practical as the ISTPs. ISTP people love to translate the facts into a bigger picture to provide perspective (Myers & McCaulley, 1985). This is an evidence of how INTJ still gives value to controlled objectivity. INTJs are also called “lone wolves” because, just like the ISTPs, they are also very independent and oftentimes they prefer working alone. They are motivated by the following: confidence, stability, competence, intellectual insight, and self-assurance. INTJs are also very objective and are independent thinkers. They also love challenges and are very practical. They want to make things easy. For instance, if you can wash the plates with dishwasher, there is no reason for you to wash it with your hands. Their being reserved and quiet is carried on to their communication style: they do not like phone calls but prefer platforms wherein they can think on their own and look at the situation logically. That is why INTJs prefer to communicate through e-mail or other similar platforms rather than being called through a mobile phone or a telephone. They have very high standards when it comes to efficiency and competence because that is one of their motivations. As to my colleague, we actually have very similar personalities and preferences. He is also very competitive and loves to work at his own pace. She doesn’t like subjective opinions and the like but is more interested in objective thoughts. He is also a very good analysts – he can easily recognize conflict within the workplace and try to avoid the people involved in those conflicts. He is also very sarcastic and fond of making fun (secretly) and hates socialization. By and large, he and I have very similar personalities that can sometimes be interchanged and mistaken. c. Since both of our personalities are very similar, it can be expected that we would not love to have the company of the other. We love working alone and at our own pace. We are reserved and prefer to stay away from the spotlight. I think the best way for us to communicate to each other is through our actions and results: if he sees my accomplishments or achievements, then that would encourage him to do better than I did; and if he does the other way around, I would do the same thing that he does to be better. I think there can be no real verbal communication that could take place in this instance – the more effective way to communicate with him is through physical demonstration of our personalities. Our management style would not have much difference at all – having very similar personalities, I think, would result into very similar management styles as well. Both of us hate participative management because we want to do things on our own and without the intervention of other people; nevertheless, since he has is more controlled when it comes to making objective decisions, I think he would be more of a consultative type of a leader. In a nutshell, and as aforementioned, there is really not much difference in the way we manage people, do things, or think about things. There is a certain degree of similarity between our personality types and I think that explains it all. Reference Myers, Isabel Briggs; Mary H. McCaulley (1985). Manual: A Guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. 2nd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press. Read More