Myers Briggs Personality Assessment Test - Report Example

Myers Briggs Personality Assessment Test Concept Myers-Briggs Myers briggs personality test has been in utilization for measuring psychological preferences among individuals. The tool is important for counseling purposes since it provides researchers ways of exploiting the world’s perception of individuals (Quenk, 2001). Myers briggs test is also an effective tool in ascertaining the way individuals make personal decisions. In application, the tool utilizes questionnaires in investigating details on clients. Through such questionnaires, researchers can bring forth influences in individuals. The tool is a result of Jung who proposed certain theories. However, with the growth in the theory, Briggs provides additional interpretation of the tool usage. According to the theories brought forth by Jung it is clear that there are certain principal psychological activities in an individual. According to his theory, individuals experience intuition, sensation, thinking, or feeling. In utilization of the tool in various counseling functions, it is true that counselors can understand customers’ feelings (Furnham, Dissou, Sloan & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2007). Through the utilization of the questionnaires, counselors may understand the sensation individuals feel about an activity. On the other hand, the tool is important in understanding individuals mind and their intuition (Quenk, 2001). This paper provides perspectives to Myers Briggs personality assessment test. It provides details on the application of the tool in institutions. One needs then to understand that the tool is designed to answer a specific theory. The designers of the personality theory, borrowed largely from Jung theory. According to Jung, individuals have two pairs of cognitive functions. According to his theory, it states that individual’s cognitive functions consist of the rational and irrational aspects. In these categories of aspects individuals’ personality may relate to their feeling and thinking. The other aspects on the irrational mind include intuition and sensation. The scholar further provides that individuals express such aspects either extraverted or introverted. Background to Myers Briggs Test Myers Briggs test has undergone various transformations since its inception in the year 1943. Since its year of inception the theory, perfection relates to continual development and research on the tool. In practice, ever since its inception millions of individuals in the globe have undergone its tests. The tool is of importance to psychologists and Counselors. The theory bases on assumption stipulated by Jung. According to Jung, individuals either are born, or develop a certain perspective on perception (Quenk, 2001). The tool is developed into four opposite pairs making 16 types of physiological difference the tool measures. According to Myers and Briggs, the difference is perspectives do not mean that one is superior to the rest; they are all similar. Therefore, in their research certain types of psychological perspectives result. Concerning these types, the model provides basis for sensing, judgment and perception. Myers Briggs type of perspective in Psychology provides the perception of individuals that relate to introversion, intuition, perception, judgment, and thinking. In relation to the usage of the tool in study, individuals need to understand certain aspects. In using, the tool individuals need to understand the meaning of all aspects used in the dichotomy. In relation to one perspective, one may state that individuals who value perception over being judgmental perceive the world differently. In organizations, Myers Briggs Test tool has been instrumental in measuring aspects in conflict management. The tool has been of an impact in the field of stress management. On the other hand, organizational leaders have used the tool in team development (Furnham et al., 2007). The tool is effective in promoting ease of communication within teams. Another aspect of importance that the tool fosters is career planning and transition. Organizations utilize the personality tool in the development of organizations and in management. Scholars have in the past mistaken Myers Briggs personality test for a real test scenario. The application of the tool is not a test at all. The instrument is not a measure of two variables or scenario but indicates preference over the other. Therefore, individuals may be either extrovert or introvert. In defining the Dichotomy of the instrument, certain perspectives arise. Individuals may define other’s personality based on where they focus their attention. In relation to the focus of attention, Introversion and extraversion take form. The other aspect of importance is the way individuals relate to information. Individuals may use either sensing abilities or their intuition in answering situations. The next in the measurement of individual’s personality relates to the way their make decisions based on the information received (Furnham et al., 2007). Other individuals relate by thinking while the rest of the people utilize their feeling abilities. The other aspect of importance relates to individuals’ reaction with the World. Concerning this aspect, individuals may either have a perceiving interaction of judgmental. Purpose of Myers Briggs personality Assessment tool Myers Briggs personality Assessment test is a product of Katharine Cook Briggs and Briggs Myers. The measuring tool however comes from theories made by Carl Gustav Jung. The product relation to its application in today’s organization relates to four theories. The four important theories in the development of Myers Briggs assessment tool cultivates from thinking, intuition, sensation, and feeling theories. The tool has been instrumental in today’s organizations on various grounds. The tool is important in the development of teams, leaders’ growth. Its application on the other hand assists in conflict management and career development. On the other hand, the assessment tool is important in the management of stress within organizations (Quenk, 2001). In relation to the distribution of Myers Personality Assessment tools, the Myers & Briggs foundation acts as distributors. In the European region, however OPP acts as the leading distributor. Uses / Application of the Instrument Myers Briggs instrument of measuring perception measures four important variables. The variable in study includes dichotomy categories of Extraversion and introversion quality of persons. The other important aspect of personality to be measured by the tool includes the category of intuition with respect to sensing. Other perspectives include thinking, feeling, perceiving, and judging. With respect to these categories of individuals, the instruments extroverts’ individuals tend to be energized. This category enjoy of individuals enjoy crowds (Furnham et al., 2007). The opposite category to the Extroverts category the introverts; enjoy solitude. Introverts tend to pursue individual goals. It is also true that introverts tend to be reserved and quite. Sensors are another category that the tool measures in depth. Sensors refer individuals who remember facts and are wants trust. On the other hand, this group of individuals does not trust intuition. The other side of sensors relates to intuitive in organizations. The tool is instrumental I measuring the intuitive nature of individuals in organizations. In respect to intuitive individuals, even if sensors deem to live in the real world, intuitive individuals pride of possibilities. The measuring tool is therefore essential in measuring the values of judgers, perceivers, feelers, and thinkers in diverse organizations. Organizations have been using Myers Briggs Assessment tools to their advantage for many years. The use of the tool has been formidable in the fields of career counseling, team building in organizations as well as group dynamics. Other fields of importance that the tool promotes include marketing, leadership training, marriage counseling, and family business (Furnham et al., 2007). Other areas of application include the prescription of life coaching and personal development. Validity and Reliability When a researcher wishes to make reliable tests consistency of the tests is of importance. However, in respect to measures in science, quantitative measures provide accurate results unlike using qualitative data. Myers Briggs personality test concentrates on measuring qualitative data. These measures of qualitative data provide certain perspectives on the reliability and reliability of the instrument. To limit aspects of negative results in the psychological fields, certain standard provides measures of consistency. In relation to the reliability of the Myers Briggs personality test instrument MBTI, it is better than other personality instruments. In terms of percentages, whenever individuals transact such tests on individuals the resultant reliability ranges from 75% to 90%. In respect to individuals changing after tests, the resultant feature concentrates on one dichotomous pair. This reliability additionally cuts across all ranges of individuals(Shuit, 2003). The qualities of the reliability scale irrespective of Age and gender, individuals receive same values. The Myers personality test is “scientifically valid”. This validity measure arises with the probability of interpreting test scores of variable using the tools. A closer consideration of the Myers Briggs measure, illustrates that the test has some consistency in its decision criteria. The calculation of variable using the coefficient Alpha by the method ensures reliability. On the other hand, the method considers a Myers manual for validation of results (Shuit, 2003). As led by practice and standards in the industry individuals using the Myers Briggs tool need to retest their variables. Retesting of variable may leads to various interpretation of data. Research indicates that retest of data may yield a 50% change on the personality traits of individuals. Therefore retesting of variable using the method leads to low consistency on decision (Shuit, 2003). Such negative connotation of the process relates to the availability of 16 personality variables to study. Additionally there are 4 scales of study which provide a reliability scale of 8. Validity Validity is another measure of importance while utilizing psychological instruments of study. In respect to Myer Briggs Assessment instrument, individuals one is able to predict behavior. The instrument through the years has provided reliable data that makes is reliable. Its reliability relates to its ability to differentiate between attitudes, behaviors, and values of diverse individuals (Furnham et al., 2007). The validity of the instrument consists of four important categories. The categories of importance include its separation of scales in four units. The other measure of validity considers the validity of the four preference pairs of traits. Another aspect of consideration for validity is the measurement of all types of personalities and combination of preferences. However, there has been an increasing criticism on the validity of the instrument. For example in a certain study, it was an expectation that the results would yield a bimodal structure of distribution. While undertaking the study the scales were actually distributed in a centrally manner. This yields information that indicates that characteristics on the two sides of the divide results in opposite perspectives. In respect to this influence, the test fails to support individuals who lie in the centre of subscales. Norm Group and population Myers Briggs personality Assessment test development may meet the demand of huge populations. An example of its application relates to the development of an assessment criteria that would include the study of introverts and Extroverts in organizations. However, in relation to other criteria in an organization setting, various frequency levels reveals the personality traits of persons. In respect to the whole population utilizing the test, 49.3% illustrates the group of extroverts (E), 50.7% of individuals; introverts meet the test requirements. Thinkers take a value of 40.2%. In the data of the population, feelers in the population take 59.8%. The judging population takes 54.1% while intuitive populations who may take the test include 26.7% (Shuit, 2003). On the other hand, the sensing type relates to the test at 73.3%. Myers Briggs personality test further considers the issues of gender in the population. Various measures in terms of gender have an influence on the test. Myers test statistics on groups Myers Briggs Test Statistics Total Male Female ISFJ 13.8 % 8.1 % 19.4 % ESFJ 12.3 % 7.5 % 16.9 % ISTJ 11.6 % 16.4 % 6.9 % ISFP 8.8 % 7.6 % 9.9 % ESTJ 8.7 % 11.2 % 6.3 % ESFP 8.5 % 6.9 % 10.1 % ENFP 8.1 % 6.4 % 9.7 % ISTP 5.4 % 8.5 % 2.4 % INFP 4.4 % 4.1 % 4.6 % ESTP 4.3 % 5.6 % 4.3 % INTP 3.3 % 4.8 % 1.8 % ENTP 3.2 % 4.0 % 2.4 % ENFJ 2.5 % 1.6 % 3.3 % INTJ 2.1 % 3.3 % 2.1 % ENTJ 1.8 % 2.7 % 0.9 % INFJ 1.46 % 1.3 % 1.6 % www.statisticbrain.com E-Extraverted,I-introverted,S- Sensing,N-intuitive,T- Thinking,F-Feeling,J-Judging,P-perceiving Summary Myers Briggs personality test is a tool designed to assist individuals identify personal traits on other people. The instrument came into operation in 1943 during the Second World War. The instrument is a creation of Isabel Briggs Myers and Cook Briggs. However, the notable feature on the use of the instrument is its association to Carl Jung theory of Psychological types (Quenk, 2001). The theory ever since its inception has undergone various transformation and research to its current format. It is essential to note that the instrument has been of great assistance in the fields of marriage counseling, employees and leadership training. Another field of importance that the instrument concentrates on is on personal development. The mode of operation of the instrument is the use of standardized tests. On the other hand, the instrument employs the use of other traits in measurement. The inventors of Myers personality test intend to utilize the indicator in identifying inborn traits and acquired traits unlike other instruments. The usage of the instrument in studying organizational values concentrates of the study of four dichotomies. The dichotomy includes the values of Extraversion, sensing, thinking, and judging of individuals (Quenk, 2001). The other aspects of importance include the introversion nature of individuals, intuition, feeling, and perceiving. Further, the instrument considers various factors in relation to its reliability and validity. Separation of scales in four units assists in the development of study scales. The instrument further provides diverse perspectives on the personality of individuals that influence behavior. References Quenk, N. L. (2001). Essentials of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator[R] Assessment. Essentials of Psychological Assessment Series. Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com Furnham, A., Dissou, G., Sloan, P., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Personality and Intelligence in Business People: A Study of Two Personality and Two Intelligence Measures. Journal Of Business & Psychology, 22(1), 99-109 Shuit, D. P. (2003). At 60, Myers-Briggs is still sorting out and identifying peoples types. Workforce Management, 82(13), 72-74. Read More