Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/english/1609341-position-review
https://studentshare.org/english/1609341-position-review.
The writer was trying to explain the reasons why an interpreter is now a necessary part of the hospital staff and that it would be a wise investment for them to do so.
The specific passages, anticipatory questions, and reasons with evidence that the audience should see as persuasive arguments can be found in paragraphs 2-4.
The paper could be more persuasive in the 4th paragraph where the writer was trying to convince the reader that the cost of having an on-call interpreter for every language in the hospital is a necessary evil. This could have been done by presenting actual statistics relating to the effective treatment of patients in hospitals that do have easily accessible interpreters.
The writer has created a clear voice that speaks for the non-English speakers who need hospital care. The voice used is appropriate for use throughout the whole paper. However, his ethos is hampered by the lack of citations in the paper that would have added credibility to his arguments.
He tries to make use of pathos by asking the readers to put themselves in the shoes of the foreigner seeking medical treatment in a hospital that speaks a language other than English.
I learned that the changing ethnic landscape of America has also changed the way we treat patients in hospitals. We need to make sure that the hospital policies follow suit to be able to provide ample healthcare to all concerned. The writer wants the reader to come away from the argument realizing that universal healthcare should also speak international languages to be highly effective in treating their patients. The writer, however, does not attempt to make the reader change his attitude, action, or opinion. Instead, he presents all of the factual data that he can muster and then allows the reader to come to his conclusions.
Read More