Why men's basketball is better than women's basketball - Essay Example

Why Men's Basketball Is Better Than Women's Basketball Based on personal observation, feeling, and liking, the above preposition will face a number of mixed reactions with those for and against drawn in equal measure. The case does not apply in the articles considered in this analysis where every writer has taken a position and subsequently supported it. This paper analyses the above preposition from three different writers, and considers their perception and the rhetorical tools they have used to drive their points and how effective the tools are in accomplishing the writer’s objective.

The first article written by Josh Kramer posits that by comparison, men’s basketball is better than that of the women in more than one way. In this sense, the writer employed the use of strategies in order to communicate and deliver his arguments and views. Where as he acknowledges that every ones opinion matters in this assessment, he also asserts that there are some inherent things with men’s basketball that makes it much cherished compared to that of the women (Kramer). He considers the airtime that the two are given and explains that men are given more than women and the situation makes it possible for men to dominate the game than women.

On the other hand, the author also posits that in women basketball, there is no overall excitement as compared to that of men. These among other thing like the predictability of the women game makes it too boring to attend to and watch. In order to drive his point home, the author has used rhetorical tools to channel the same, for example. The writer thus has employed the use of ethos (ethical persuasion) to deliver his point home. For instance, when he says it is considered unethical for women to celebrate victory with a finger raised towards the opponents as it happens in the men’s case (Kramer).

This is aimed at making the readers understand how the women’s game is bereft of jubilation thus explaining its unpopularity. The writer has also used logos to persuade the writer about his position. When he says that women games are not accorded much airtime in the media compared to men, it really gives the sense of appreciation why one of the gender games is better than the other. With reference to the second writer, he explains his point by using logos. In this sense, he logically convinces the readers that men’s basketball is better that women’s because of the period in which it has been existing.

He says the given that basket ball was formerly meant to be men’s game, it has affected and shifted attention to their game than that of the women, making it to be better off compared with the women (Ziv and Lidor 29). Ethoses have also been used in this regard where ethical issues have been used to make the audience be convinced about the writing. Rhetorical tools used here have influence in understanding the author and appreciating his contribution on the topics. The writer carefully designed his writing to draw the reader’s attention through emotions and logics.

This strategy does work effectively when the intention of the writer succeeds in the readers. In the entire article, the author has selectively used these tools to draw points and ensure that the target information reaches the audience without alteration. Similar to the first two writer, the third writer has also explored the possibility of using rhetorical tools in ensuring proper relay of the intended information. The question of making a choice for the audience in this topic seemed to be carefully considered, realizing that every person has a feeling and a reason to take either side.

Making the point to be appreciated by the people, it needed a careful use of the rhetorical tools to make the readers appreciates the position through logics and emotional touch. In this regard, the writer has used logos in order to make the points palpable, for instance, when the authors says that star powers and entertainers are likes by the people which is only seen in the men’s game and not the women (Hanis-Martin 23). This makes it possible for one to appreciate the content of the articles than if they were not used.

In conclusion, rhetorical tools are very important in making communication to be delivered in a way that people are engaged. Thus, connecting with the audience is one of the most important issues to develop when giving oral speech or written. The authors in the three article shave successfully use the tools to fix their points and it is appreciable that they could connect they points to the specific rhetoric in passing the information. Works Cited Hanis-Martin, Jennifer. "Embodying Contradictions: The Case of Professional Women's Basketball.

" Journal of Sport and Social Issues 30.3 (2006): 265-288. Print. Kramer, Josh. "Why mena€™s basketball is greater than womena€™s basketball | TheSportsKraze." TheSportsKraze. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Feb. 2013. . Ziv, Gal, and Ronnie Lidor. "Vertical jump in female and male basketball players-A review of observational and experimental studies.." Journal of science and medicine in sport / Sports Medicine Australia 19 (2009): 31. Print.