How does McKibbens book conclude What is his final argument - Essay Example

Eaarth by Bill Mckibben McKibbens argument in his book Eaarth is that through global warming human beings have made huge alterations to the earth such that it should no longer be known as earth. According to the author, the new earth can never go back to the old earth because of all the carbon that human beings have dumped into the atmosphere. Moreover, the effects of global warming today are so huge that even if pollution was to stop the effects cannot be reversed. This book argues that it is not probable that human beings will stop polluting therefore we should be ready for worse effects.

McKibbens concludes that human beings should expect massive extinction of species and higher cost of living in the future. In addition, the author relates scientific effects of global warming with local effects that individuals will experience. Mckibben concludes that people should stop focusing so much on economic growth, which according to him is the main cause of environmental changes. This is because economies all over the world have been striping off natural resources from earth to improve their economic status.

However, according to McKibben the new earth should include living in a world where people are willing to live with less. This earth will have many economic problems since people will have less attachment to material things and be more connected to the nature. Furthermore, this book points out that the new earth will have repercussions on the economic status of generations to come. However, according to him, human beings cannot escape the new earth since they have already killed the old earth; thus, the new earth will not use machines in its food production to avoid polluting the environment.

This means that it will be more labor intensive than the old earth and according to the author; more focus will be given to farming and producing organic food.