Download file to see previous pages...
Yet again, not all students are interested in playing sports as a side activity.
Consequently, apart from their initially decided terms of a sports scholarship, they often get little part in the revenue these sports generate for their school. Critics and coaches are, therefore, now arguing in favor of these players saying that they deserve a share of the revenue, as they for the most part contribute towards generating. The debate is a highly heated one with each side feeling just as strongly of their opinion.
The number of college athletes in a particular college can be very significant and all these athletes have a choice of which sport they want to take part at the college level. Some sports may have a high popularity level while others low. Deciding upon paying athletes for playing may compel the college to pay all the athletes for all the different kinds of sports in the college. This may result in heavy payments at the end of the day and it may also reduce the profits earned by the colleges at a massive level.
Those who argue in favor of paying athletes generally say that colleges make millions of dollars off these athletes abilities and, therefore, for them to get no money from it is unfair, and, in a sense, exploitation to them (Haden 673). Without these players there would be no generated money, and without this money, many colleges would be unable to function. Colleges gain popularity at the sports arena due to the talented athletes that represent the college in the sports. Earning by the talent of the athletes and not paying those athletes sounds an unfair practice.
Accordingly, it seems fair to pay to these players, just as any national sports association would pay its players. But, of course, the counter-argument to this claim is that students should be kept away from the business side of a college, regardless of the link between both elements (Parent 226). College level is the stage where the students explore their talents and
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The study will present a balanced report on the influence of athletics and games on the overall academic performance of the students. After the collection of data, the findings will be analyzed and results will be interpreted subsequently. In addition, the data relevant to the North Georgia schools available at various websites will also be consulted for the study.
This study gave an insight into the ethical notions existing between athletes and colleges, and it gave many evidences, which proved that idea of paying to college athletes is correct because its advantages are more for every individual of the society. It reflects the notion of equality, human rights, value of hard work and most importantly significance of justice in the society.
College Athletes Should be Paid to Play. College athletes are at a severe financial disadvantage compared to other students and therefore should be paid at least a stipend by the university. Students not involved in sports are able to obtain part-time employment in order to purchase necessary peripheral items such as toiletries, clothing, school related incidentals and perhaps a pizza on the weekend.
It has now become a top money-maker for the NCAA and the member-schools. The billions of dollars generated from the football league however have not positively affected the lives of the players themselves. On the other hand, the schools have been gaining so much extra funds for spending on other programs and non-revenue sports.
The National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA), however, does not allow college athletes to get paid, because they are defined as “amateurs.” This paper argues that it is not fair for collegiate athletes to not be paid, when other parties economically benefit from intercollegiate sports.
Accordnig to the report college athletics began as a form of exercise and competition for colleges. It was like any other school event. Students used to hold internal or inter college athletics competitions. Most of these formalities have changed and business has entered into college athletics. Most of college athletics have attracted advertisers and promoters.
Media coverage and newspapers bring forth the events clearly, creating fame and recognition of athletes by the fans. Players on the other side are awarded fringe benefits, which may constitute a college education, insurances and much more (Griffin 73). According to the provisions of the media coverage, college sports are considered an important event with various institutions claiming the best awards and the stakes being high on publicity and profile.
The study stresses that psychological predisposing factors to eating disorders occur in female university athletes and that further investigation is needed to explore the extent of the relationship between the variables. The study recommended the examination of the role of peers and coaches in the development of disordered eating.
College athletics have long been in existence. Kissinger and Miller observe that since 1800s, campuses in the US have been involved in athletics competition (1). Modern day college athletics seek to bring together intellectual aspect of college with a
Recently, the subject of paying college athletes has hit headlines, making a buzz in the field of sports and the society in general. Many people are bothered if there is a need to alter the norm of not giving and allowing
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Should college athletes be paid to play for FREE!