Cultural Dimensional Model of Hofstede and Mintzberg - Essay Example

Individualism. This dimension deals with the amount of interdependence that a society values among its members. Observably, individualism in the context of the US is relatively higher and scores 91 while China scores 20. This implies that people in the US are more concerned about themselves and the family members. On the other hand, China is categorized as a collectivist society where people place importance on group efforts (The Hofstede Centre, “Cultural Tools”).Masculinity. This dimension reveals the degree of value placed by the people on achievement and success.

Correspondingly, Chinese society can be found to be driven by achievement success and competition. Accordingly, it ranks 66 with respect to the dimension of Masculinity. On the contrary, the US, although not represents a feminist society but it ranks 62, which is slightly lower as compared to China (The Hofstede Centre, “Cultural Tools”).Uncertainty Avoidance. China ranks 30 in terms of uncertainty avoidance, which implies that the people in China are more enthusiastic and like to conduct activities that are governed by low regulations.

On the other hand, the US ranks 46, which is comparatively higher than China. This implies that the people in the US are more inclined towards revealing risk-avoiding behavior than the people in China (The Hofstede Centre, “Cultural Tools”).Pragmatism. In terms of pragmatism, Chinese as compared to American culture is very pragmatic and people in China are more dependent on the situation, context and changing scenario. According, the US ranked 26 while China scores 87 on the scale of pragmatism (The Hofstede Centre, “Cultural Tools”).

Indulgence.