We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Controversies In Archaeology - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Summary
Instructor Date Controversies in Archaeology Natural vs. human causes Towards the end of the Pleistocene period, some of the world’s largest mammals disappeared in North America either they ceased to exist anywhere in the world or they completely disappeared…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
Controversies In Archaeology
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Controversies In Archaeology

Download file to see previous pages... At the end of Pleistocene period, these animals had completely disappeared or extinct. In Asia and Europe, a similar pattern of extinction of Pleistocene mammal took place where lions, bear, and woolly rhino disappeared (Fagan 47). The central question that archeologist and paleontologists ask is what caused the extinction of these large mammals in such a short time span? Some archaeologists, scientists, and paleontologists have proposed that the demise of these mammals can be attributed to the climatic changes while others such as Paul Martin have attributed it to the human cause or hunting overkill. Martin’s explanation of the disappearance of the largest mammals towards the end of Pleistocene period has not received endorsement from North American Pleistocene archaeological and paleontological records. It has been a controversial topic in archaeology since the 1860s with some archaeologists arguing that human hunters were the ones responsible for the extinction of the Pleistocene mammals. Currently, the issue of human hunters being blamed for the disappearance of the world’s biggest creatures has been disputed with scholars from North America, Western Europe, and Australia arguing that mammal extinction during the Pleistocene period cannot be blamed on the overkill (Meltzer and Grayson 586). The theory of overkill has been disputed because of lack of sufficient evidence. Paleontologists and archaeologists argue that the overkill theory was entirely based on beliefs or faith rather than on science and concrete evidence from animal’s remains. Archaeologists such as Paul Martin has attributed the extinction of the world’s largest mammals to human causes as he asserts that their extinctions were because of impact of human hunting in North America. Further, Martin argues that the climatic changes during the interglacial periods did not lead to the demise of the large mammals such as Mammoth at the end of the Pleistocene period because these animals were well adapted to different environments and therefore, they could not succumb to the changes in climate. The appearance of the Clovis hunters in North America 11,000 years ago corresponds to the disappearance of some of the extinct species such as woolly rhinos. The fluted points have been discovered in relation with the bones of the extinct species of these animals such as the bison, horse, mammoth, and camel. These discoveries suggest that the Paleo-Indian and Clovis hunters with quick and effortless access to animals ignorant of the dangerous predators such as lions and bears rapidly eradicated the entire species of large animals they faced (Price and Feinan 152). Martin’s argues that the Clovis group of hunters hunted these Animals, which led to their extinction. Archaeological evidence from these sites and other North American plains contained the remains of mammoth, which made Martin assert that the Clovis hunters hunted these animals. This reasonable observation was then translated into generalization that the Clovis people were big game hunters even there was no (and still there is no) evidence for such specialization. Due to this rationale, some North America archaeologists have attributed the North American Pleistocene extinction in part to human causes. In order to justify his arguments, Martin used Island extinction to prove that human colonization led to the disappeara ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
Archaeology
This paper now seeks to understand the importance of evolutionary approaches to the study of archaeology. It will seek to evaluate the theories of evolution and how they impact on the understanding of archaeology and the elements which also surround it. This study is being undertaken in order to establish a detailed and critical analysis of the subject matter in the hope of establishing an academic foundation for archaeology and related theories.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Archaeology
Collection of artifacts is employed to determine patterns from which inferential links based on ethnology, ethnoarchaeology, experiment, etc. can be used to make statements about behavior. As the question for this assignment states, “based on this pattern of reasoning many archaeologists have recently argued that archaeology can contribute to scientific understanding of long-term ecological change and the structure of modern environments.” This is the opinion of our instructor and will be examined throughout the remainder of this discussion.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Archaeology
The dimension of archaeological culture is comprised of the requisites or material culture remains of the past human societies. That is to say, the study of archaeological culture of a particular society focuses on its material culture remains collected from specific time and place.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Environmental Archaeology
Dating is executed primarily post excavation, although to support best practice several first round dating work referred to as spot dating is generally run alongside excavation. Dating is very significant in archaeology for the purposes of assembling prototypes of the past, since it relies primarily on the reliability of datable samples and objects.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Environmental Archaeology
The natural status of the environment has significantly changed due to the human activities taking place in the environment. Patterns of social integration also influence natural resource utilization, and this affects the condition of the natural environment in several ways.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Marxist Archaeology
The ideal path to carry out this mission is through Marxism, feels the author. Archaeologists are of the opinion that both Archaeology and Anthropology should be close to each other. There is no need for a separate identity between the two. They have no doubt that Marxism will accomplish this task.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Archaeology
Burger and Salazar (2005) report “Machu Picchu was abandoned around AD 1532, many aspects of the Inca culture and society survived” (191). If the Incas survived, why was Machu Picchu abandoned? Since the
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Landscape Archaeology
His scope is to study the way modern usage has placed different foci and implications on the word and stretched its semantic facility. Thomas takes empirical and cultural archaeology, belief
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Feminist Archaeology
The authors wish to show the areas where feminism could make a contribution to the greater discipline of archaeology both presently and in the future. The subject of gender, which according to the authors is one which has of late received increased attention, is
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Archaeology
Yet, another selective process has happened, not under human control or influence and not a human nature function. Before the civilization, all life was ruled by an intricate, biologically-evolved imperative.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Controversies In Archaeology for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us